top 200 commentsshow all 253

[–]MasonJarTeaDrinker 219 points220 points  (42 children)

Amazing how it's came to this bs.

[–]username1153 59 points60 points  (21 children)

At first look this seems like a sensational comment, but it actually does represent a valid concern, how the hell did it get like this?

[–]Wheatspin 27 points28 points  (0 children)

Because our women have signed us all up for pin the tail on the donkey. Most men and women are running around out there, blindfolded, trying to pin the proverbial tail on the donkey of how things should be. Nobody wants to take off the blindfold and see the truth because that would be cheating and the women who signed us up for this game would get angry.

[–]Gnometard 28 points29 points  (1 child)

When all the fat women and feminists got together on tumblr.

[–]zpatriarchy 26 points27 points  (0 children)

it really is tumblr.

these girls have been complaining about the limits they face as teenagers, things that are really just a direct result of being young & unemployed, those things get re-blogged a million times & they blame the patriarchy.

they grow up but keep blaming men for everything. in college it just gets worse. even when they have money & are independent, they keep blaming men for all their poor choices because it's habit now.

[–][deleted] 55 points56 points  (4 children)

Simple, we gave women the vote. Women are 55% of the voting pool, which means anything they can be scared into becomes law.

[–]AngraMainyuu 36 points37 points  (0 children)

Emotionally charged rhetoric is the politicians most powerful tool. Men fall for it too, but then that's what this sub was started for, to get men out of that trap.

[–][deleted]  (2 children)


    [–]nantes89 4 points5 points  (0 children)

    Prohibition came before women had the right the vote. The Eighteenth Amendment (prohibition) was "...certified on January 16, 1919, with the amendment taking effect on January 17, 1920.

    The Nineteenth Amendment (women's right to vote) was ".. passed by Congress June 4, 1919, and ratified on August 18, 1920, the 19th amendment guarantees all American women the right to vote.

    [–]mc0079 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    I don't think you understand history.

    [–]5 Endorsed Contributorgekkozorz 10 points11 points  (0 children)

    Just a theory with no evidence, but honestly, I don't think there's a lot of intersect between the women demanding all these ridiculous reforms and women who are actively having sex.

    I think younger women riding the CC are complaining about how much they get raped because they want that sweet juicy validation that comes with victim status, but since these chicks also love the rough, less-than-openly-consensual (ie, ravishment) sex they get from DT's, they're not actually actively trying to fight against it.

    But the feminists who are a) fat b) past the wall c) socially ostracized some other way don't get much or any good sex anyway, so they're trying to ruin it for everyone else the same way the gov't ruins things it doesn't like - by regulating the shit out of it.

    [–]MarriedRP 38 points39 points  (2 children)

    It just hit me, our phones already have this app. It's called the "camera". Just video her begging you for the D.

    [–]5 Endorsed Contributorgekkozorz 30 points31 points  (0 children)

    "I was coerced to make that reaction by my boyfriend, and the clip is taken out of context, and I was drunk so I wasn't in my right state of mind, and he was using his patriarchy mind control to force me to say those things, and..."

    Anything can be rape if you hamster hard enough.

    [–]19 Endorsed Contributordrrrrrr 5 points6 points  (0 children)

    I changed my mind halfway through.

    [–]NietzscheanStoic 19 points20 points  (10 children)

    I can't remember, other than my stupid teenage years, ever asking a girl if it is ok to put my penis in her vagina. It's always been one thing leads to another, or a look on her face.

    Just like they ruined marriage, they want to ruin the most basic primal act.

    [–]DexterousRichard 6 points7 points  (9 children)

    Some women never know when to stop shit testing.

    I actually should have learned this many years ago from my little sister. She would take something from me or hide something or whatever, and I would threaten her to stop or I would hit her progressively harder each time I asked.

    At first I would hit her pretty softly, and ask again - give it to me. Then a little harder - again, give it to me.

    She would NEVER give in. Never. Even though she was really getting hurt. And she knew she would, and she knew she could stop it, and she knew she was in the wrong for taking my shit. And she always thought she was the victim and it was my fault.

    This is a similar example. I truly believe that feminists would eventually go so far that men refuse to have sex with women and turn to sex robots en masse. They would go so far because they cannot comprehend indirect effects of their actions or of laws. They cannot understand incentive effects. It's just unbelievable to me, but all they can see is the very next move, not even one or two moves ahead on the chess board...

    Even if you showed them a news report from the future, in which all men had sworn off women due to draconian laws, they would do the same thing.

    [–]jcrpta 2 points3 points  (1 child)

    Even if you showed them a news report from the future, in which all men had sworn off women due to draconian laws, they would do the same thing.

    There will be a new form of rape defined, in which a man refuses to have sex he's committing it.

    [–]jcrpta 1 point2 points  (4 children)

    At first I would hit her pretty softly, and ask again - give it to me. Then a little harder - again, give it to me.

    She would NEVER give in. Never. Even though she was really getting hurt.

    My wife does the same thing - escalate an argument ad infinitum, no matter how firmly I tell her to knock it off - and I think it's for the same reason. You were failing the shit test.

    There is a theory - I've seen Athol Kay espouse it, and FWIW I think he may have a point - that says shit tests are there to see how you'd deal with disciplining a child.

    If you escalate it constantly - you're demonstrating that sooner or later you might cause a child some serious damage. You are also demonstrating loud and clear that such behaviour gets an emotion-driven reaction. In short, you're demonstrating you'd be a lousy dad.

    My working hypothesis right now is that escalating a shit test is often completely the wrong thing to do - particularly if it's picking a fight. Better to shut it down by refusing attention - ie. take yourself away from the woman and go completely silent - don't talk to her, don't acknowledge her existence no matter what she does, if she walks in you walk out, if she blocks your exit you walk away and sit back down in silence.

    It's essentially the grown-up version putting your kid on the naughty step for 5 minutes.

    [–]1Ill_mumble_that 3 points4 points  (1 child)

    And this right here is why women should never be allowed to:

    • Vote.
    • Take office.
    • Serve as a judge, police officer, fireman, or any official position.
    • Raise children on their own.

    [–]NietzscheanStoic 4 points5 points  (0 children)

    The Greeks, Romans, and Vikings were right all along for making their democracies exclusive clubs.

    [–]jamieoneal82 14 points15 points  (3 children)

    It's a massive shit test. Another prong in the feminine imperative to enable women to identify betas more easily. Any man who follows this asinine law to the letter is a hapless eunuch.

    [–]pl231 12 points13 points  (0 children)

    I don't think so.... I'm not going to risk getting charged with rape over trying to seem alpha....

    Not saying I'm going to use the app, but since I don't want to be in jail, if I'm in California I'm definitely going to be more assured of things before I go for anything with a chick.

    [–]MasonJarTeaDrinker 4 points5 points  (1 child)

    That's BS, most of the lays I get have at least some sort of LMR, this thing wouldn't work in the real world of women feeling shamed for fucking.

    [–]jamieoneal82 9 points10 points  (0 children)

    Missing my point. Of course it wouldn't work. Only hapless betas would use it. That's the point.

    [–]duckducklandwhale 63 points64 points  (18 children)

    Oh man lol that chappelle skit coming into fruition. That being said this doesnt really take of the real issues. A woman can still claim she withdrew consent after a night of "oh gawd, im such a slut. what have i done" or "I was drunk when I consented on the app, I am a women and therefore not liable for my alcoholic intake"

    I do agree with how wholly unpassionate, unexciting, and turn-offish it is but I dont think any woman in her right mind (aka not a feminazi) would go for this. I find it more plausible a female guilt-trip strategy (like "if you really loved me"", "Why are you being so weird...") would be employed.

    [–][deleted]  (9 children)


      [–]erokk88 28 points29 points  (7 children)

      God that was a fun conversation. One of the things I always held over my ex was marriage. She would ask when, how, how much, where at.. and all I'd ever say is that it's not up to you till I ask. "Well when will that be?" You'll never see it coming, I'd say. When I told her that she'd be signing a prenuptial if we ever did get married she asked why and I told her that the money I've saved before marrying her is mine, and that it would always be mine. She never could make sense of that notion. Never could make sense of how the 26 years of savings before meeting her could just belong to me and not be shared. Fuck that. Huge warning sign and happy to be rid of her. .

      [–]TekkomanKingz 13 points14 points  (6 children)

      Sometimes it's not the prenup itself that saves your ass but how they react to it.

      [–]Dark_Shroud 9 points10 points  (4 children)

      Amen to that. As a former banker I've seen all kinds of insane garbage. People going through a divorce. One that's memorable is where the husband went to therapy then came out as gay and bailed on the family.

      Not to mention stupid people playing house. Parents brining in their barley adult children lecturing them before getting to the counter. "Why the hell would you open a joint account with someone you're not married to?"

      When I finally buy land & a house it's all going into a trust.

      [–]ChoppinTheTarts 1 point2 points  (3 children)

      I am not familiar with a much in the financing world. What does putting it in a trust mean and entail and why would you do so?

      [–]Dark_Shroud 0 points1 point  (2 children)

      A Land Trust means the land is paid for and set up under a contract. It's owned by the "trust" and managed by the "Trustee."

      So I would set up a Trust and buy the land I want for the Trust with myself as the Trustee. The Trust would own the land and I would manage it.

      That means the land cannot just be taken from me even in a divorce.

      [–]ChoppinTheTarts 0 points1 point  (1 child)

      I see thank you. Would there be any downsides to doing so?

      [–]Dark_Shroud 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      Lots of paper work, fees for creating the trust, and tax issues. Land Trusts are taxed differently, just pay them and you're fine.

      That paper work includes some method of naming the next Trustee in the case of your death.

      [–]CryptoManbeard[S] 13 points14 points  (5 children)

      Could definitely see the guilt trips and shaming start because of the app. In an ironic way it could actually show strength. "I'm not fucking you without the app." Shows that you've been there done that and aren't going to put up with her shit. A doormat would cower to her desires if he encounters any resistance.

      It's all facetious though, I don't know if anyone takes this seriously. I would consider using it in a light-hearted half joking manner. If anything I think it has merit if a lot of people use it simply to highlight how ridiculous of a position the feminists have put us in, and the unintended consequences for "regular people" who just want to partake in the oldest of all forms of entertainment.

      [–]dawg826 8 points9 points  (4 children)

      I think any woman would see through the half-joking bullshit straight away. You're just acknowledging that she has power over you and you are trying to get it away from her in a half-assed manner. She will lose respect and thus attraction for any guy who tries to pull this.

      [–]daktardoom 1 point2 points  (2 children)

      Not if you present it like a prenup, and make it clear that you are only interested in sex if she signs it. That shows her you don't put her on a pedestal and are prepared to walk away. That's pretty powerful to me.

      [–]1Ill_mumble_that 5 points6 points  (0 children)

      This. We're talking about jail and the sex offenders list. Fuck that law. Women brought this shitty app on themselves.

      [–]dawg826 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      I would be inclined to agree, but the half-joking cover to make it look like you don't really care is clearly a lie.

      [–]Hexthorne 1 point2 points  (0 children)

      The skit in question in case anyone is wondering.

      [–][deleted] 52 points53 points  (5 children)

      Maybe they will add FB login so you can post your fucks online and keep score.

      [–]un-affiliated 38 points39 points  (4 children)

      "Login to Facebook to see which of your friends have consented to sex with this girl"*

      • premium version only

      [–]OneTouchHowMuch 15 points16 points  (2 children)

      Check in at the girl's vagina with Foursquare.

      [–]jcrpta 3 points4 points  (1 child)

      "18,271 people checked in here".

      [–]OneTouchHowMuch 1 point2 points  (0 children)

      You can check out but you can never leaeeeve

      [–]EeeeeeevilMan 139 points140 points  (16 children)

      Can you imagine how fast a woman's vagina would dry up if you actually whipped out this app and expected her to do it? I bet it would make that same sound it makes when you're trying to suck the last few drops out of a fountain drink from McDonald's.

      [–]CryptoManbeard[S] 107 points108 points  (14 children)

      This is exactly why everyone needs to do it. If ALL men from Brad Pitt to the Pokemon nerd start requiring it, women are going to start turning on eachother. "OMG just be a man and fuck me!!"

      Then we'll just start spouting out the feminazi bullshit back at them. "This is a patriarchal society and we are just looking to protect the women in these encounters. Why don't you want women to be safe? Do you hate Women? Stop propagating rape culture!"

      [–]6Invalidity 69 points70 points  (7 children)

      The most attractive men will not need to go through the ropes with an app like this. They'll get sex, the old-fashioned, lustful way.

      If you're thinking that this app will revolutionize or change the way things are, you're in for a sad revelation.

      Feminists are pushing the restrictions so that when they go out to bars, they will only be approached by confident men, or they themselves will approach men they are attracted to, and will not end up going home with someone they regret having sex with the morning after.

      [–]CryptoManbeard[S] 24 points25 points  (3 children)

      I think there is merit to some sort of consensual sex formalization for men with high SMV, only because they have more to lose. The last thing a pro athlete wants is some girl claiming she was raped.

      [–]AveSharia 16 points17 points  (2 children)

      I think Tucker Max was doing this for a while, and it actually worked in his favor. Oh, you want to mess around? Well, I'm kind of a big deal, so I'm going to need you to sign these forms first.

      [–]ChoppinTheTarts 13 points14 points  (1 child)

      That's different though. At that point it serves as social proof so a different animal altogether.

      [–]AveSharia 3 points4 points  (0 children)

      Oh totally. I am in no way suggesting this app is a good idea.

      It is a terrible, terrible idea.

      [–]1Jaereth 7 points8 points  (1 child)

      and will not end up going home with someone they regret having sex with the morning after.

      As long as alcohol is served at bars this will still happen. Male and Female.

      [–]6Invalidity 14 points15 points  (0 children)

      It will still happen but the frequency will be much lower. The idea is that feminists are trying to instill fear in less attractive males from taking advantage of lowered female inhibition (when women are intoxicated).

      [–]AngraMainyuu 4 points5 points  (0 children)

      Sadly I'm not confident that just having high SMV is enough to keep out of the cross-hairs of a false rape accusation or maybe an unwanted pregnancy or two.

      [–]Gold_Mouth 8 points9 points  (2 children)

      Is this whole rape hysteria a upper class white thing? Really, it seems like only women I ever hear talking all this feminist shit are actually privileged white women.

      The ones I know would say, "What the fuck is a rape culture?"

      [–]netgrey 2 points3 points  (1 child)

      Yes, anyone else probably has a brother or Boyfriend that's been to prison and knows what actual rape culture is.

      [–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      Or a woman who has actually been raped and is furious at this white girl nonsense.

      [–]EeeeeeevilMan 6 points7 points  (1 child)

      True, but there is not even a snowball's chance in hell of that happening.

      [–]anonlymouse 7 points8 points  (0 children)

      Unless players decide to start doing it. I'm sure they'd get some entertainment out of it.

      [–]Hudoneit 1 point2 points  (0 children)

      Sorry dude it's a clever idea but stop while your ahead. It's never gonna work.

      [–]1Ill_mumble_that 1 point2 points  (0 children)

      Then again, if you have a looong list of consenting women that could add some nice preselection.

      [–]nophoney 35 points36 points  (6 children)

      There's a loophole guys

      "Yes means yes, but affirmative consent can be withdrawn at anytime"

      It doesn't mean what you think it means. It means what she thinks it means.

      [–][deleted] 25 points26 points  (2 children)

      So it's more like, "No means no, and yes might mean yes or might mean no"

      [–]CryptoManbeard[S] 18 points19 points  (1 child)

      Only a rapist would worry if he was raping.

      [–]Eifersuchtig2 4 points5 points  (0 children)

      Oh my god this makes me want to cry.

      [–]boom-shocka-locka 2 points3 points  (0 children)

      Hamster: I want to invoke the "anytime" clause and go back before I agreed to have sex with the rapist because <insert not my fault excuse> and change my answer to NO.

      [–]ytismylife 1 point2 points  (1 child)

      The only logical solution to this is to keep confirming affirmative consent on the app at 5 minute intervals.

      [–]JovianTrainWreck 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      Nooo dammit man, stop giving them ideas, they'll fucking do it

      [–]17 Endorsed ContributorArchwinger 66 points67 points  (4 children)

      I'll insert the blue pill response for you guys:

      OMG! Can't you social retards read vague body language cues and have discussed your kinks and safe words at length with your social circles years ago? Can't you just not rape people?

      When I was 17, I was dating this girl and started fingering her, and she was just laying there. Back then, we didn't worry so much about rape accusations, but she was my first, so I was worried I might be doing something wrong with my technique. So I asked, "You okay?"

      She responded, "Why are you talking?"

      "I wanted to make sure you were okay with this."

      "You know what? Just forget it."

      I ended up losing my virginity to her a few weeks later. But you can damn well bet I didn't ask her about my actions again.

      Get this. A few times, she didn't like what I was doing and stopped me. And I totally stopped. It was a terrible system. Thank God we have smartphone apps now.

      [–]Surtrlljos 21 points22 points  (0 children)

      me and my ex lost it to each other, so before every time we got close i would ask if she was okay with it, she would keep saying no, so i stopped everytime. Than finally she felt ready after i asked her if it she was okay with it. Years later after breaking up, she is telling her friends i coerced her into sex, giving her guilt trips and i was pestering her for sex.

      [–]5 Endorsed Contributorgekkozorz 6 points7 points  (0 children)

      Get this. A few times, she didn't like what I was doing and stopped me.

      Whoa man, watch it with the victim blaming!

      Don't make women give consent with their words. Teach men not to do things women don't want or like.

      [–]vicious_armbar 6 points7 points  (1 child)

      The goal isn't to force men ask for explicit permission to have sex. Because 95% of the time that would stop the encounter right there. The goal is to allow women to charge men with rape after the fact if they end up having buyers remorse.

      [–][deleted] 93 points94 points  (29 children)

      You can't even ask "can I kiss you?" because that's a huge turnoff for women, it makes everything seem robotic. Imagine how disappointed would a woman be if you're making out, then you hand over your phone with this shit hahaha.

      "What, you're asking me permission? Fucking betas..."

      [–]trpcounselor 29 points30 points  (4 children)

      I have exact proof of that, just with one girl and four years apart. The wow factor is only missing because it didn't happen to you and you might think I'm bullshitting.

      In 2010 I was a fair bit skinnier, dressed slightly different and had not such good game with girls. ANYWAY. I made a PoF account, and this girl wanted to go out with me. I was super nervous, but looking back it was super apparent she wanted to fuck.

      We met up at her apartment complex, and went for a walk. It was nearly 1230 at night. Ended up at the local campus just sitting on the bench. I said something like "are you a good kisser" while her head was in my lap and she was purposefully grazing my dick. She said "yes". Then I said "When can I find out". And she snaps and goes "nah I'm sorry not to be a bitch but that's a COMPLETE turn off".

      Long story short, little-game me couldn't salvage that situation. We never spoke again.

      Fast forward to 2014. I make an OkC shortly after graduating college and moving back. This girl agrees to meet up with me. We meet in the park and I instantly start thinking it's the same person as from four years ago. Why? Same hair length (it's very short and kinda a bit curly) and style that not many girls have.

      Well, this time I came armed with 4 more years of game and we were going back to her apartment. Which was exactly on the same side of the apartment complex I had parked my car on the first time in 2010, at the same exact place. (She was a grad student there now). Long story short, we end up fucking that night because I just made moves.

      Now, I decided not to say anything even though I had my suspicions. Instead, I just remembered that she said her BF went overseas and that's why they broke up, he cheated, then she cheated back. I asked about her ex'es and SURE enough I heard the same story again. I couldn't believe it.

      At this point, I knew the only way to find out for sure was to see how she reacted to one day me asking for a kiss. I already knew she was moving away soon as she found a job and I could definitely recover from it this time since we'd already fucked.

      Sure enough I ask one night and she straight up goes "that's the most unattractive thing anyone could ever say and I fucking HATE that question... now I'm not kissing you"

      [–]DaNiceguy 25 points26 points  (8 children)

      That's no use. You need ongoing, affirmative consent. If you change sexual positions without asking and getting verbal confirmation, it's switch rape.

      [–]dawg826 18 points19 points  (0 children)

      You can't make this shit up.

      [–]EvilNando 15 points16 points  (1 child)

      time to press the eject button on american women

      [–]DaNiceguy 6 points7 points  (0 children)

      Did that a decade ago. Now Japan, there's a place.

      [–]3toss 5 points6 points  (0 children)

      Jesus Christ this place has gone to hell...

      [–]Tarnsman4Life 5 points6 points  (0 children)

      Sounds like you basically need to record the encounter and make sure she is screaming "Yay baby keep fucking me, HARDER" the whole time...

      [–]Galaldriel 2 points3 points  (0 children)

      Anyone living in a state with oppressive laws has every right and opportunity to vote with their feet. Move to North Carolina where we have laws that actually make sense: or look up NC State v Way from 1979 that ruled that if intercourse begins consensually, “no rape has occurred though the victim later withdraws consent during the same act of intercourse.”

      I love North Carolina

      [–]1critter_about_towne 4 points5 points  (0 children)

      That's the fakest shit the fakers ever did fake. That goes enough beyond regular trolling I'm gonna call it frost trolling.

      [–]sir_wankalot_here 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      That chick missing most the cards in her deck.

      [–][deleted] 16 points17 points  (6 children)


      "I hereby affirm that I am currently taking the birth control marked below:

      • IUD
      • HBC Pill
      • HBC Patch
      • Other: Specify

      Furthermore, I certify that it is effective and active, and that any pregnancy that may result will be my sole responsibility should I decide to bring the child to term. In the case that I do not wish to carry the child to term, I will require half (50%) of the required funds to undergo an abortion."

      [–]should_ 2 points3 points  (2 children)

      This. Curious why hypothetical-guy has to pay 50%; is it because the guy should've used a condom too, or just for him to get out of paying 100%?

      [–][deleted] 5 points6 points  (1 child)

      Sometimes shit happens and you need to just pay.

      There's nothing you can do about it.

      If she lied and wasn't on the pill or IUD, she's on the hook for that, and can be sued for breach of contract, and a lawyer more witty than I am could probably make it so that the second clause is negated by either side's failure to perform their duty of care.

      If the IUD and the pill and everything else fail, shit happens. It's a calculated risk, you took it, and everything went wrong. Nobody's to blame.

      [–]jcrpta 2 points3 points  (0 children)

      Won't work.

      The law does not care about any of that. The law only cares about the resulting child and what it needs. How the child wound up getting conceived is neither here nor there.

      And the child needs feeding, clothing and housing. Neither partner can easily relinquish their financial duties - they certainly can't do so with some home-cooked quasi-legal document.

      [–]DexterousRichard 1 point2 points  (0 children)

      Should require a deposit as well, to cover potential attorney fees, to be returned after the statute of limitations on rape expires.

      [–]ArchangelleManhater 16 points17 points  (2 children)

      Is this meant to be legally binding? Some sort of contract?

      No, the app facilitates communication, reduces misunderstandings, and indicates a level of sobriety. It encourages people to discuss what they want to do before they do it, but it is not a contract.

      But couldn’t the fact that the Partner has used the app to say “I’m Good2Go” be helpful to the Initiator if the Partner later claims assault?

      An initiator who uses Good2Go to confirm that a potential partner both consents to sexual activity and is not incapacitated (and therefore unable to consent) will have a level of mutual understanding that is well beyond what often exists today. Just the process of using Good2Go to obtain consent before engaging in sexual activity will reduce the number of assaults and alleged assaults.

      So you can't even use it as proof that they consented to sex.

      "What do I do if they claim I raped them"

      "Well, this won't help you. But at least you had a level of mutual understanding"

      "But I didn't clearly, because they are claiming I raped them"

      Jesus christ, the stupidity...

      [–][deleted] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

      That is literally the stupidest thing I've ever heard, not even fulfilling its advertised purpose. If she can still claim you "coerced" her out she was too intoxicated to tell you how intoxicated she was there's absolutely no point to making yourself out to be such a pussy.

      Edit for grammar

      [–]DasWood 11 points12 points  (0 children)

      Won't work, because any evidence that can be used to prove your innocence will not be allowed to be presented.

      [–]PedroIsWatching 24 points25 points  (1 child)

      There's actually a Washington Post article revealing how the app is selling both your info and the info on the people you fuck to advertisers.

      [–]myschadenfreude 31 points32 points  (26 children)

      I'm very interested to see this in use. This will dry up some (most?) passion, but it's the world we live in. If we have to have non-spontaneous, transactional sex, let's cover our bases with a paper trail of consent.

      Additions thst should be added: "I'm bringing a condom. Y/N" and "I have, to the best of my knowledge, disclosed all know STI's."

      EDIT - Add a final clause. A reminder that pops up 12 hours later causing manual action. Asking: "Thank you for using Good2Go. This act was consensual. Reminder: sexual performance or regret of consensual acts are not assault and falsely accusing assault is illegal.

      Unless you click Not Consensual and check which areas from the previous agreement were violated a confirmation of consensual acts message will be sent to all parties. Please remember to practice safer sex and thank you again for using Good2Go."

      Give everyone piece of mind at the cost of romance, passion, knowing how to actually interact with others, promoting "victim culture" as well as "rape culture" etc.


      [–]Endorsed Contributorcocaine_face 28 points29 points  (7 children)

      If you guys want, I'm a programmer, something like this would be trivial to make.

      Give me a list of requirements and if people actually intend on using it, I'd be happy to spin one up this weekend.

      [–]1MarcusDavidson 8 points9 points  (2 children)

      I'm a programmer and this is a liability nightmare for you. Take a PM or HR person aside and tell them about this over coffee. Casually drop in the phrase "secondary liability".

      [–]elevul 3 points4 points  (0 children)

      Yeah, this definitely needs to be worked up with a lawyer or a team of lawyers that can make it admissible in court.

      [–]Endorsed Contributorcocaine_face 2 points3 points  (0 children)

      I work for a tiny company - I'm the only full time employee besides the CEO, and in the software I'm specialized, freelancing is extremely, extremely common at very high prices, so I'm not really going to get in shit for an app.

      You guys really think labeling it some blue pill shit like, "Consent is Sexy" would be a bad idea?

      [–][deleted]  (2 children)


        [–]elevul 1 point2 points  (0 children)

        after-the-fact feedback/rating system

        HAHAHAHAHA, the chaos this would cause. I love it!

        [–]jcrpta 0 points1 point  (0 children)

        after-the-fact feedback/rating system.

        Hahaha! That's fantastic! I can just see an ebay-style set of ratings and feedback that people would gladly show prospective partners. "You're okay with me, love, four and a half stars and recent feedback including OMG FANSTASTIC ORGASM!!11oneone"

        [–]ChoppinTheTarts 1 point2 points  (0 children)

        That is awfully cool of you to offer but I'm afraid such a consent form would be such a mood killer we would never get to the sex

        [–]CryptoManbeard[S] 15 points16 points  (2 children)

        It just gets better the more I think about it. "I agree that I am currently on birth control and in the event of pregnancy, agree to terminate the pregnancy. In the event that I change my mind, I agree to pay the initiator a non-termination fee which will be calculated as the annual court ordered child support multiplied by 18 years."

        [–]Flargmastaflex2 8 points9 points  (0 children)

        Good luck on that, crocodile tears in court and they'll throw that out faster than you can even get a paternity test.

        [–]anonlymouse 7 points8 points  (10 children)

        Add in acceptable sex positions and kinks.

        [–]CryptoManbeard[S] 15 points16 points  (9 children)

        The following sexual acts are desired and consent will be implied unless the code word: "CheeseWhiz!" is uttered. (check all that apply)




        -Derogatory Namecalling

        -Choking to the point of passing out

        -Choking passed the point of passing out

        -Choking via fellatio

        [–]anonlymouse 8 points9 points  (3 children)

        Of course the moment anyone passes out all activity has to stop as consent is no longer possible (that's probably a good idea with breath play regardless).

        [–]AveSharia 2 points3 points  (2 children)

        Hmm well maybe if they consent in advance to being passed out, and appoint an attorney-in-fact to object in the case they attorney-in-fact decides that the principal would not have, in fact, consented to further escalation if the principal was still conscious?

        "Hey mom, I need you to co-sign something..."

        [–]1Jaereth 2 points3 points  (1 child)

        Nah man, my preferred safe word is Bratkartoffelverhältnis

        [–]anonlymouse 0 points1 point  (0 children)

        You only use it with French girls I take it?

        [–]southernmost 1 point2 points  (1 child)

        This is approaching levels of utter lunacy only seen previously in shitty sci fi movies:

        [–]yummyluckycharms 5 points6 points  (0 children)

        Ironically, the solution as presented in the movie was sex robots, which is exactly what society is heading towards if news from japan is to be believed

        [–]mctoasterson 0 points1 point  (0 children)

        Excerpts from the Apple Store terms and conditions fine print.

        [–]TheObelisk 6 points7 points  (1 child)

        That's why I have my lawyer's desk right next to my bed along with a stenographer. And when the love making is over I hand her my card and tell her people to call my people and confirm postage on any pending lein wavers.

        [–]myschadenfreude 6 points7 points  (0 children)

        Bwahahahaha yes. This is the Orwellian Consent Culture that feminists want.

        [–]craylash 3 points4 points  (1 child)

        Before you know it we'll be wearing having sex through VR helmets like the movie, Demolition Man.

        [–]100 Modbsutansalt 6 points7 points  (1 child)

        As social commentary this is pretty genius. As having any bearing on a court case or college kangaroo court? Don't bet on it.

        [–]CryptoManbeard[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

        The pendulum has to stop swinging at one point, we need something to reverse the momentum. A college agreeing to use this could be what we're looking for. What comes next? "Wave of women continue to be raped at college campuses even after consenting to sex and verifying they had a good time."

        "Great work fellow it's time to work on our next pieces of legislation: 'Yes means no!' otherwise known as 'Penis=Rape.' "

        [–]1 Endorsed Contributorvandaalen 11 points12 points  (7 children)

        There is a much easier way around this. Stick one of these on your door and have your webcam with audio running.

        Fuck her good til she screams, then shout at her "You like how I fuck you, you dirty whore?" and make her answer.

        You have a recording for your own amusement, to critically review your techniques and it can also be used as evidence since you anounced that you record everything going on in your appartement.

        Classic bi-winning.

        [–]after27tries 8 points9 points  (1 child)

        "Your honor, I have some evidence of consent. Mind if I play the recording to the audience and jury?"


        Everyone leaves.

        [–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (1 child)

        IANAL, but I think you would have to have that sticker say something about audio recordings also in some jurisdictions.

        [–]vicious_armbar 2 points3 points  (0 children)

        Depends on the jurisdiction. You can get free legal advice from a lawyer in your state here:

        [–]Cant_Tell_Me_Nothin 5 points6 points  (0 children)

        Somehow this idea of asking for consent I think makes it easier for betas to ask for sex. It's is easier asking "can I kiss you" than having to take the risk and just going for it. It is easier having to ask "can we have sex" than leading and escalating without asking for it.

        [–]username1153 4 points5 points  (0 children)

        Imagine you saying to a girl "ay bby want sum fuk" then the girl accusing you of sexual violence and you're just like "sorry I was just asking for consent" haha

        [–]2RedPillSafe 3 points4 points  (8 children)

        Find a lawyer that knows something about how the law is written.

        If it turns out this app is making some legal error it could be thrown out as evidence in court.

        Law requires precision.

        [–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (2 children)

        Each act must be consented to.

        If consent is withdrawn during intercourse, either verbally or non verbally, any sex that occurs afterwards is sexual assault.

        This app has zero binding effect. It's worthless pandering to feminists.

        This is the first in a long line of Rape-hysteria products. First it was the vaginal insert with barbs, then it was the nail polish that detects roofies, now this.

        Next up?

        A paint bomb that dyes your cock with UV sensitive paint (although most human fluids glow under UV, w/e).

        Subcutaneous silent rape alarm with GPS/Transponder. Once broken, electrolyte solution flows into the electrode, creating a current that lasts for 48 hours, utilizing a powerful transponder/GPS array to locate the victim/body.

        Anti-rape drugs. Drugs that render you immune to rape, and able to fight off any rapist: i.e. angel dust.


        [–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

        That Subcutaneous silent rape alarm is some james bold level shit.

        [–]loghead11 0 points1 point  (0 children)

        The vaginal insert was never intended for western was intended for South Africa.

        [–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (4 children)

        I don't see how this would hold up in court, I mean there is literally a checkbox that lets you specify that you were intoxicated when you entered the agreement. There is no way that is legally binding.

        [–]2RedPillSafe 1 point2 points  (2 children)

        Yeah, this gives a false sense of security.

        A pre-nupt can be declared invalid simply because it was signed too close to the marriage. It's recommended that the pre-nupt is signed a month in advance.

        The short notice combined with the ability to be drunk won't work.

        My advice:

        Simply have a full legal disclaimer stating that you are giving consent then an "OK" button.

        After that you could require a signature or consent by voice.

        ...if it's done correctly it would be a good app.

        Maybe a video selfie should be required?

        [–]sir_wankalot_here 2 points3 points  (0 children)

        Maybe a video selfie should be required?

        Police signed and video confessions have been thrown out because cohersion was proven.

        [–]Azothlike 0 points1 point  (0 children)

        Being drunk is not enough to legally void sexual consent.

        You have to be Incapacitated. AKA, "pretty wasted", which is exactly why the app has different options for "intoxicated"(legal), and "pretty wasted"(not legal).

        [–]Azothlike 1 point2 points  (0 children)

        In court? Yes, it would hold up as evidence.

        Legally, you can consent to sex while intoxicated. The word the law uses to assert when you cannot consent is "incapacitated", which is more severe than intoxicated.

        You can find this in the new federal definition of rape, and in the overwhelming majority of state case precedents. Really, unless you're on a college campus, there is 0 additional risk from "intoxicated" sex(re: from buzzed to drunk, but not wasted) in terms of being accused of rape, as there is with sober sex.

        Even California's Yes Means Yes law sticks to the "Incapacitated" diction.

        [–]bam2_89 2 points3 points  (0 children)

        Next we'll need one to protect ourselves against stare rape.

        Also, Chappelle's Show predicted the future.

        [–]Elodrian 3 points4 points  (0 children)

        Sign here, and here, initial here, and check this box to decline anal, unless...

        [–]tedcase 15 points16 points  (3 children)

        [] My gender identity is the same as the one I was assigned at birth.

        [–]bonekeeper 2 points3 points  (0 children)

        Well, at least this will take care of LMRs, because they will have explicitly clear that they want the D before going home with you - no point in playing angel at your doorstep.

        [–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

        The app should go a step further and use the M7 to see if she can walk a straight line in order to confirm that she can give meaningful consent.

        [–]ben0wn4g3 2 points3 points  (0 children)

        Seriously is this some American bullshit.... All this false rape stuff that is.

        [–]daktardoom 2 points3 points  (0 children)

        Oh this is hilarious. I'm actually glad this has been made, and hope all guys use it to help protect themselves from false rape accusations. Women can thank feminism for men becoming more aware and more critical of their sexual partners. This way they'll only lose their sexual power, and be forced to work harder in life if they want to get ahead and/or find a partner that thinks they are worth it. I know I've become múch more selective in my partners. In fact, I now just stick to fuckbuddies instead of relationships. Why buy the cow if you can get the milk for free? :-)

        Many men can actually thank feminism for becoming more aware of all the double standards men face in todays society. We're done with this bullshit. It's time women took a hard look at themselves and the way we treat men in today's society. Time to kick women of their pedestal and realize how much privilege they had, and are going to lose.

        [–]AlkaloidSwag 1 point2 points  (2 children)

        didn't dave chappelle make a skit like this (back before smartphones) using a contract?

        [–]CryptoManbeard[S] 1 point2 points  (1 child) - Yes but we're leveraging the power of The Cloud here...

        [–]2HornedLamb 1 point2 points  (0 children)

        Poe's Law? It must be.

        [–]Jibouti 1 point2 points  (0 children)

        I'm in utter disbelief that it's come to this.

        [–]loghead11 1 point2 points  (0 children)

        This isn't real.

        An iPhone cannot accurately establish someones identity and state of intoxication. The girl can simply say 'he forced me to input my information'. If you really sleep around with the false rape parade enough to need this, then you should re-examine your life.

        [–]trpalternate 1 point2 points  (0 children)

        The Initiator would have to hide the sobriety screen from the Partner. Also, the answering text from the Partner’s phone reaffirms the sobriety level that she chose. Furthermore, falsifying information on Good2Go violates our terms of service. In addition to having committed the crime of sexual assault, the perpetrator would be committing fraud. If found guilty, he or she would be subject to harsh, perhaps even criminal punishments.

        That was the only thing that kept me from wondering whether this was a Poe.

        [–]giraffe34 1 point2 points  (0 children)

        This is so stupid to the point where I love it.

        [–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

        It could be called "So... Can I Tap That?" and should be similar to the Yo! App. Way more fun.

        [–]jolly--roger 1 point2 points  (0 children)

        "This app is incompatible with all of your devices."

        I'm screwed and not the way I'd like it.

        [–]Tarnsman4Life 1 point2 points  (1 child)

        We mine as well go one step further; invent an interactive sex robot with a realistic feeling cunt, mouth and ass. We already have robots that can Cook, we already have robots that can clean ( <3 iRobot); all that is missing to make your average know nothing 20 something quasi-feminist obsolete is a robot that duplicates average to below average sexual encounters without the risk of a false rape claim.

        [–]CryptoManbeard[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

        Enter: Robo-Rape. "Vaginas are people"

        [–]Clbull 1 point2 points  (0 children)

        Yes means Yes, BUT can be changed to NO at anytime!

        Such as after intercourse, because we're a society that welcomes falsified rape claims!

        [–]bretbret 1 point2 points  (1 child)

        This is how it would go if you actually used this app...

        Guy: just do it, it's funny (and will protect me from rape charges)

        Girl: okay

        (you fuck)

        Days, weeks, months later in court...

        Guy: Look I have consent on the app!

        Girl: I was drunk lol

        Judge: Guy you are a rapist, go to prison immediately.

        [–]SickSadWorId 0 points1 point  (0 children)

        So you're fucked if you didn't use the app as well...

        [–]rpmale 1 point2 points  (0 children)

        Sorry but the top men won't ever need this shit. And I'm not aiming for mediocrity.

        [–]pineappleclock 1 point2 points  (0 children)

        How about this: A condom with a EULA on the wrapper that specifically states "by opening this condom I declare my sobriety and willingness to participate in sexual activity", and make it from a material that retains fingerprints. The guy then asks the girl to open the condom and saves the wrapper somewhere safe for evidence

        [–]bama79rolltide 1 point2 points  (0 children)

        This is what happens when you regulate consent. There is a pro and con to everything. You regulate consent you take the romance and mood out of hooking up with someone else for either a possible relationship or a one night stand if you are in to that. Its a sex-contract pure and simple.

        [–]DrBillC0sby 1 point2 points  (0 children)

        If there were ever a time to say this, I think the time is now: I don't want to live on this planet anymore


        edit: formatting

        [–]raceAround126 1 point2 points  (0 children)

        Look. It's perfectly simple!

        Yes means yes. Yes? So when I say yes, I mean yes. Yes? Yes!

        EXCEPT when I say Yes, I can mean yes but also no at the same time in such a way that if I said yes but say no, I don't say no, I say yes, so yes. Yes?

        So Yes is yes except yes and no are both yes at the same time, except when I say Yes but should have actually said either nothing or Yes kinda.

        Now when I say no, it actually means yes but only sometimes. No may be more than one word to, such as "We really shouldn't" or "I'm not that sort of girl." But in such situations where they are that sort of girl, no can be yes and also fun. Yes in this situation is a REAL RED FLAG that you should watch out for. Yes means no almost absolutely except when I say yes to be yes! In which case no is yes but if I say Yes then you should immediately pack your bags and leave town cuz the cops are on the way!

        Now, when I don't say anything at all, that's where it gets really fun. When I say nothing, I mean yes but no but yeah OK, go on then! A wink or a look is a good way to determine if my silence means yes or no. If I touch my belly button and give a sideways glance, it's always a yes. But I can cancel that yes later by touching my ear or rubbing my nose in which case a silent yes becomes a silent no, but that can also be a No depending on whether I'm looking directly at you or at a nearby object to my immediate left which could also signify a No, or at least that a Yes may be cancelled depending on what happens next.

        A "Maybe" is right out! There is no maybe. Unless of course I haven't decided, in which case it may start of as Yes (please see above for "Yes") but it could be a No later on depending on what I touch or rub.

        Now just to get back to Yes again. Yes could be yes as discussed, however if you apply the average hotness of the girl you're with, multiply that by age and add on the batshit insane factor, this is a sedimentary metric of how many people will sympathize with her in the event of you misreading a yes to be a no, or even a no to be a yes then a no, back to yes again and ending up with "I really shouldn't have drunk that much!" In this case, a yes may be yes but you need to divide the sympathy index by the inches of your cock (use both length and girth, take whichever is the lower) and you have your magic Yes to No metric. The lower the yes metric the more yes is Yes and the less No is No and in which case, party on Wayne.

        Be aware that this could also end up in a No depending on the FBF (Fucked Best Friend) constant. If you fuck the best friend after you fucked the girl who said yes but no but maybe but yes again, then the yes could become a no and therefore nullified and you have two people you unwittingly raped despite their saying yes. Add Tumblrinas and you get a world of hurt and entry to the nearest rape-list.

        However, don't let that deter you. Remember cock-score? If you are a troo alpha and your cock-score is large enough, you may secure no's from both parties in which case, this is yes and you can have a threesome. They'll both say no, but this is yes as already evidenced by the fact that earlier when they said yes, it meant yes and therefore no is the new yes, except when they say yes in which case, as stated, get the fuck outta there, son!

        Clear? Yes? Fine!

        [–]flexiblehold 1 point2 points  (10 children)

        Only betas worry if they're raping a woman, or wonder if she might regret it, or aren't sure if she really wants to.

        [–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (9 children)

        Not 100% true. Ten years ago (or so) I hooked up with girl. I was 24(?) She was 27. Hung out a few times then the first time we had sex it started out amazing. Best I'd had. Im on top just having a great time. So is she. About ten minutes in she asks "Do you love me?" I kinda pass it off as heat of the moment pillow talk and keep going. She grabbed my face with both hands and NEEDS to know if I do. I leave myself in her while I ask if she is serious. She says she is dead serious. I pull out, put my clothes, say sorry and walked the fuck out. Then I sat in my apartment for three days waiting for the cops to come knocking. I spent the next month looking over my shoulder.

        [–]flexiblehold 1 point2 points  (5 children)

        Not like I'm saying I don't sympathize with you about this, but...

        • 1) apologizing for consensual sex
        • 2) losing frame control
        • 3) failing her LMR/ASD shit-test
        • 4) feeling guilty for not being in love or being able to say you were in love
        • 5) spending half a week in isolation and a month in fear afterwards

        NOT ALPHA

        I.e., your story does not refute but rather supports my previous theory/assertion.

        [–]codemoney 0 points1 point  (0 children)

        It would have to be something more like the bar scene from Cherry 2000.

        1:00 in.

        [–]dicklord_airplane 0 points1 point  (0 children)

        this still won't legally protect anybody because you can claim that you were intoxicated or under duress when you used the app to affirm consent. and that could actually happen, too. a rapist could threaten a girl to sign in to the app.

        hell, apps or contracts for consent like this might make rape easier to get away with because actual rapists could force their victims to sign over consent. if you save your password on your phone and you pass out drunk or get roofied, your rapist just has to sign into your smartphone and sign away your consent. this is a terrible idea.

        i am so glad that i graduated college in 2011 before any of this nonsense came about. jesus fucking christ.

        [–]ALadyLikeMe 0 points1 point  (0 children)

        I once spent a summer in the French countryside on a research trip that was half Americans, half French. One American girl talked about a French guy literally scooping her up and running off to a barn without a word (so romantic!) Another time a French guy was flirting with me all evening as I was trying to learn the language, and just after I settle down for bed I get a "knock" on my tent (we were all camping) and as soon as I zip opener the door, before I could even see who it was, the guy is kissing me.

        My conclusion is the reason girls think France is so romantic is because of the no BS "surprise" effect the guys have of just going for it with a girl. It's risky, it doesn't give her time to say no, it's sexy as hell.

        Aside from the lack of mystery and surprise, if someone used this app with me it would be a red flag that maybe they've been accused of rape in before, have a shady background, and are in risk of violating their probation, so it would be an automatic NO until I did a background check. Duh!

        [–]torontoitguy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

        If this app is not made by the Onion network, then I am really, really sorry to the creators of it.

        [–]pacnwdude 0 points1 point  (1 child)

        So if she says yes, but doesn't choose stone sober option, she can still call rape, and now she has proof. I don't see how this helps anything

        [–]SickSadWorId 0 points1 point  (0 children)

        So the two situations where you have the app and you dont, if she's not sober you're fucked either way. "proof" it's on your phone, just throw it at a wall or bury it if you're that concerned.

        [–]skoobled 0 points1 point  (0 children)

        I honestly hope this is satire. But even if it's real, it's still fantastic satire

        [–]Sol_Invictus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

        I can hear all the Prosecuters in America laughing their asses off right now /s

        [–]RPSavant 0 points1 point  (0 children)

        doubt this app will help, provided her vagina is not dryer than the desert after being presented with the app. First of all, "are you good to go?" could mean a million things other than "may I place my hard penis into your vagina?"

        Then there is no way to prove that the other person was the one providing consent. She could always just say the guy entered in the information for her.

        [–]Roine_Stolt 0 points1 point  (0 children)

        This it too goddamn funny. Well done Crypto

        [–]qwerty622 0 points1 point  (0 children)

        this doesn't solve, and may in fact hurt issues like drunken hook ups. she claims it was rape, no checkbox in this yes means yes app, and now you're going to court.

        [–]hohamocha 0 points1 point  (0 children)

        The moment you whip out tat app to ask "permission", she's gonna reject you for some dude who doesn't have that dumb app.

        [–]pwrfull 0 points1 point  (0 children)

        That entire site looks like one giant joke. A satire. It's not even April Fools Day yet.