top 200 commentsshow all 218

[–][deleted]  (73 children)

[deleted]

    [–]ShekelBanker 140 points141 points  (65 children)

    Brit codeword for Pakis/Indians is Asians, someone back me up on this.

    [–]Areimanes 84 points85 points  (26 children)

    Correct.

    It's a politically correct term invented to sound as non-racist and vague as possible.

    Everyone knows it's a code word for Pakistani's/Indians.

    [–][deleted] 24 points25 points  (0 children)

    It's a politically correct term invented to sound as non-racist and vague as possible.

    Not really, we call people from India/Pakistan and the surrounding area Asian because the overwhelming majority of Asian people in the UK are from the subcontinent, just like in the US Asian refers to Chinese/Japanese/Koreans etc, because most Asians in the US are from the Orient.

    [–]honey_pie 27 points28 points  (1 child)

    Its not a fucking "code word" or an "invented politically correct term", it's just how people in the UK refer to South Asians (Pakistanis, Indians, Bangledeshis). It is not an attempt to give them greater respect by conflating them with Japanese or Chinese or any other East Asians. It's not a secret that it means brown desi people.

    [–]eatingonthetoilet 1 point2 points  (0 children)

    It refers to the geographic region they come from. Using that naming convention Canadians and Mexicans would be called North Americans because that is the continent they hail from. Given that the British empire spanned the globe it's probably a convention that arose from necessity since it'd be easier to refer to people by continent than try to figure out which of the hundreds of former territories of the empire they hailed from.

    [–]Endorsed ContributorRedBigMan 4 points5 points  (2 children)

    Fuck PC... I call them Pakis or ragheads. Particularly if they dont seem to have made any attempt to learn the local language.

    [–][deleted] -3 points-2 points  (1 child)

    Fuck PC... I call them Pakis or ragheads

    Get this tough guy! Raghead is supposed to be an insult at at Arabs anyway you fucking shitwank, if you're gonna be a racist bellend at least get your terminology right.

    [–]um_ognob -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

    He doesn't know the difference between I-rock and I-ran. It's not his fault, its his daddy's who was never around.

    [–][deleted]  (18 children)

    [deleted]

      [–]fmas 3 points4 points  (5 children)

      Spotted the indian sikh. C'mon dude, every religion/race/nationality has its fucked up ones.

      [–]makethemsayayy 4 points5 points  (0 children)

      "Oh yeah cuz not all muslims are terrorists...except...you know, they are" --Ricky Gervais as a dolphin on Family Guy

      [–][deleted]  (3 children)

      [deleted]

        [–]fmas -3 points-2 points  (2 children)

        Well, I know sikhs who aren't saints. Like I said every people has its sick and filthy individuals. But you're too proud to admit that.

        [–][deleted]  (1 child)

        [deleted]

          [–]JohnPeel 6 points7 points  (0 children)

          And by Asians in this case it is specifically Pakistani Muslims.

          It isn't Hindus or Sikhs.

          [–]paladisious 20 points21 points  (10 children)

          In the UK, "Asian" means people from South Asia, such as India, Pakistan and Bangladesh, but in the rest of the English speaking world in countries such as the US and Australia the term Asian means mostly people of East and South Eastern Asian ethnicity such as Chinese, Vietnamese and Japanese.

          Just a quirk of the language.

          [–]Bottled_Void 17 points18 points  (9 children)

          Asian used to mean Chinese, Japanese etc. in the UK too. It changed in the 90s. It was probably the only thing we could convince Joe Public to start using instead of Paki.

          Seems everyone is pretty confused now as everyone east of Turkey is now 'Asian'.

          [–]muyuu 6 points7 points  (6 children)

          As far as I'm concerned everyone from Asia counts as Asian, including India, China, Bangladesh, Japan, Philippines, Cambodia, Vietnam, Pakistan, etc etc. in the English language - here in the UK as well.

          [–]manslutalt 1 point2 points  (5 children)

          Don't forget Turkey, Iraq, Israel and Russia.

          [–]muyuu 1 point2 points  (4 children)

          Those from the Asian parts of Russia are indeed Asians. Iraq and Israel are more debatable as they are in the Middle East somewhere without a clear delimitation (the Urals don't go below the Caspian sea).

          But yeah Eastern Russia is Asia and most of Turkey is Middle East / Asia.

          But as far East as India there is no debate really.

          [–]manslutalt 0 points1 point  (3 children)

          Iraq and Israel are more debatable as they are in the Middle East

          The Middle East is not a continent. Most of it is in Asia. Asia borders Europe in Istanbul and Africa in Suez, making Israel and Iraq squarely in Asia.

          [–]muyuu 0 points1 point  (2 children)

          The definition of Europe has changed historically, but if you disregard the Middle East and consider the traditional Southern border to the East of Istanbul then yeah. However not many countries consider that. The northern border at the Urals is more Universal at least in Europe.

          From the Asian point of view in older times Anatolia was purely Asian and fundamental in the silk road. Which is why it's also known as Asia Minor.

          Asia is mostly a cultural and political construct, the landmass is Eurasia. A word used commonly in Russia.

          [–]manslutalt 0 points1 point  (1 child)

          The Ural Mountains are to the east. Iraq and Israel are to the south from Europe, so the eastern border is not relevant to them.

          [–]SirNemesis 2 points3 points  (0 children)

          That's just basic geography.

          [–]1niczar 1 point2 points  (0 children)

          "Asia" originally meant everything east of the bosphorus. Asia Minor = present day Turkey, more or less.

          [–]nomeme 22 points23 points  (19 children)

          It's not a "code word", "paki" is the equivalent of calling a black person the N word so of course no respectable article would use it. "Asian" means pretty much any brown person in the UK. Almost nobody can tell the difference between indians and pakistanis so it's easier to say "asian".

          [–]stimulated_narcolept 42 points43 points  (15 children)

          Funny, here in California, "Asian" is pretty synonymous to having a light complexion. All the Indians are like "Hey, we're Asian too you know!", but are dismissed.

          [–]Purecorrupt 10 points11 points  (5 children)

          I wonder if Russians talk shit about the euro-russians versus asian-russians.

          [–]16 Endorsed ContributorGayLubeOil 6 points7 points  (2 children)

          Zhirinovsky in European Council (ENG subtitles): http://youtu.be/5He_PGomJVs

          Russians talk shit its what they do. Thats why im here to talk shit.

          [–]randomchaos1[S] 2 points3 points  (1 child)

          Russia is the last based European nation in the world...

          [–]Atavisionary 0 points1 point  (0 children)

          Are you sure you are using based correctly? How can a whole country have one exclusive personality type? Especially one which few people in any country actually have.

          https://antidem.wordpress.com/2014/12/13/the-basis-of-based/

          [–]ComradeCynic 3 points4 points  (1 child)

          They do, with Tajiks, Uzbeks and those from the Caucasus being called "chorniy" which is Russian for "black". Georgians also get made fun of some of the time, especially in movies - Mimino and Kin-Dza-Dza being two movies that come to mind.

          [–]iSnORtcHuNkz69 1 point2 points  (3 children)

          They're all pretty much black.

          [–]BhiQ 12 points13 points  (2 children)

          I hear the term "sand-nigger" is quite popular in some regions.

          [–]skyclown 7 points8 points  (1 child)

          That would be for Arabs not Desis.

          [–]BhiQ -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

          Not like people who call other people "sand-nigger" know that ...

          [–]soulmatter[🍰] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

          I live in an area with a lot of Indian and Asian immigrants in America. And we call them Indian. There's a huge difference between Asians and Indians: ethnically, visually, and emotionally. They're different kinds of people.

          [–][deleted]  (3 children)

          [deleted]

            [–]stimulated_narcolept 3 points4 points  (2 children)

            C'mon dude, which ones in Asia?

            [–]wurding 8 points9 points  (0 children)

            It is a codeword for "South Asian" or Muslim though.

            By calling the Pakistani ans Bengalis "asians" they then equate the criminality of these groups with Asians as a whole, includign Chinese, Japanese, Indian and Sri Lankan who commit comparably less crime. It also masks the connection between Islam and sex slavery.

            [–]TheSliceman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

            Wow. Just wow. speechless. Ultra Orwellian.

            [–]Tom_The_Human 0 points1 point  (0 children)

            I've encountered this in the South, however in the North I see a lot of people using Asian as a blanket term for south east Asia, and Paki/Indian for, well, Pakis and Indians (and other countries from that general area).

            [–]Cross_of_Coronado 12 points13 points  (0 children)

            The Feminism that has become mainstream will not engage in a difficult fight. It's all about getting attention. Of course it is. It's repulsive.

            Picking on nerdy boys which have no lobby? Of course. Fighting ACTUAL abuse or even commenting on it? Unthinkable!

            It's disgusting. There IS a place for feminism because God knows women have it bad in some parts of this world. But that thing, that they call "feminism" in the West? I don't know what it is. It'sl WRAPPED in a packing that says feminism but has some other content.

            [–]1Zanford 9 points10 points  (0 children)

            Proves that feminists don't care about helping other women, they just care about attacking (white, well-heeled, straight) men.

            Attacking universies/frats = more guilty grant money and special programs from universities. Attacking Pakistani organized crime = no gain.

            The lesson: if you're someone that SJWs KNOW will never apologize or back down or care about its image (like Pakistani gangs), they won't attack you in the first place. They'll still to weak targets like universities, or successful white men who could lose their jobs (Firefox guy etc.)

            [–]evoblade 2 points3 points  (0 children)

            Welcome to our modern culture. We pick meaningless things to become outraged over and actual outrageous things go under the radar

            [–]Atlfalcons284 -1 points0 points  (1 child)

            You're a dumbass. Just because you go to UVA doesn't make you rich and entitled. Look I dont know if “jackie” was raped,but how does seeking justice for a potential crime make you entitled? What are you small dick idiots so pissed off about. Unfortunately there are too many crimes for us to focus on all of them. My friend was trying to explain this subreddit to me so I had to check it out. He was right about you all being a bunch of little babies. You people remind me of that Elliot Roger kid that shot up his town because girls didn't like him (because he was a pretentious pussy like all of you).

            [–]Tilting_Gambit 41 points42 points  (9 children)

            The mathematics basically explain all of this. In order for SJWs to maintain or gain power, they need a solid base of support. The general gist of the dilemma is that conservatives don't want change, therefore push back against most minority groups. Immigrants and SJWs are included as minorities in this equation. For SJW types to get the support through numbers on their side, they need to make an unconscious alliance with other minorities.

            This is why we have SJWs criticising Christians, anti-abortionists and men in droves: They see these guys as conservatives and therefore the enemy. But fundamental Muslims also hate Christians. Which makes them an ally through media and politics. You have a quiet alliance where feminists truly do hate what Muslims stand for, but cannot say it (as a population) because they need Muslims to even out the numbers.

            It's like this: Feminists get blacks, Arabs, Muslims and all the other minorities. Everybody else = the enemy.

            [–]1IVIaskerade 17 points18 points  (2 children)

            Of course, the SJWs can't actually allow the minorities to think for themselves - they might not reach the right conclusions, so it's best that the SJWs speak for them.

            [–]Gold_Mouth 12 points13 points  (1 child)

            Most minorities don't even know those motherfuckers exist, and if they did, they wouldn't associate themselves with those people.

            [–]1IVIaskerade 15 points16 points  (0 children)

            Ah. You appear to have arrived at that "wrong" conclusion I mentioned. Fortunately, the SJWs are there to set you straight!

            [–][deleted]  (1 child)

            [deleted]

              [–]makethemsayayy 2 points3 points  (0 children)

              I think the reason SJW becomes SO appealing is because people want to believe they've had to overcome lots of shit to get where they are. Their take on this is that they want so badly to have a victim complex, to believe they've had it so rough and abusive their entire lives, how they managed to make it through college without getting raped 50 times is just the most miraculous thing ever.

              When in actuality, girls are treated pretty well their entire lives. People fawn over them, they're not expected to do manual labor at any point, daddy probably paid their way into college so they wouldn't need any loans, ect.

              Again, like you said, there are people genuinely suffering, but they have not gone through anything. They act like the cat-calling (which they will miss when they get older and nobody cat-calls them anymore) and act like that's SO awful.

              So being an SJW can allow them, with a cushy life, to think they've had it rough and are amazing inspirations for just making it through the day with a vagina.

              [–]ThorLives 5 points6 points  (1 child)

              I have a different theory. SJWs and feminists have an idea about the hierarchy of privilege. Basically, "white males" are at the top of the privilege hierarchy, which causes jealousy and anger based on belief that "white male" equals "oppressor". Other groups of people (women, racial minorities, religious minorities, sexual minorities - gay/trans/etc) rank lower in the hierarchy. The tendency is to side with the "oppressed" (women, racial minorities, religious minorities) and against the "oppressors" (white males). It gets annoying when the question of "who's right and who's wrong" gets replaced with a kneejerk "take the side of whoever is lower in the hierarchy" type of thinking. When, say, a religious minority is the oppressor, it screws up the narrative and causes cognitive dissonance. They don't know who to complain about, so they end up feeling very conflicted and do nothing.

              It's so much simpler and straight-forward when the "oppressor" is white males.

              This also explains why, for example, feminists feel conflicted about complaining about the sexual objectification of women in rap or R&B (and let's face the fact that, historically, black music has been far more sexualized and objectifying than white music). It's so much easier to complain when it's Julien Blanc or Robin Thick, but somehow Pharrell completely escaped blame for "Blurred Lines", even though he wrote it - http://www.billboard.com/articles/columns/pop-shop/1565044/pharrell-williams-top-40-return-10-songs-that-prefaced-his-pop

              It gets weird, though, because feminists don't seem to realize that white males are the most liberal males on the planet, so they're actually turning on the very group that should be considered their best ally. I've even seen gay friends defend muslims, which seemed weird to me since a lot of Islamic countries would put him in jail or give him the death penalty for being gay. (I will admit that the anti-Muslim stuff can go over the top, but I'm still surprised by the extent to which they're willing to defend muslim culture.) I think it must be a "you're oppressed? Me too! We have so much in common!" type of thinking.

              [–]makethemsayayy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

              One Gucci Man song is far worse than Blurred Lines, but Robin Thicke is white, so OH MY GOD THAT SONG IS ABOUT RAPE. Fucking shitlords! is the reaction.

              And you're completely right on the muslim thing. I just don't get how they're not foaming at the mouth about how women in the Middle East are treated?

              Oh that's right, because it's not about justice at all. It's about getting more people on your side and white males can only be evil. Meanwhile, if a woman gets raped in the middle east, she gets fucking stoned to death. But tell me again how cat-calling is abuse!

              [–]Endorsed ContributorRedBigMan 1 point2 points  (0 children)

              It's like this: Feminists get blacks, Arabs, Muslims and all the other minorities. Everybody else = the enemy.

              So basically white males are the enemy... Makes sense given the narritive that white is a privileged position as well as male being a privileged position.

              Men get their privilege as a result of obligations placed on our gender. Women get their privilege as a result of having a vagina (not even being willing or capable of having children).

              [–]Kelly_Gruber 24 points25 points  (8 children)

              But Muslims.....people are too much of pussies to be labelled racissssss

              [–]1IVIaskerade 16 points17 points  (0 children)

              Like OMG are you islamophobic? You can't hold these people accountable to the laws of the country they're in, that would be culturally insensitive!

              [–]leopoldvonleopoldson 26 points27 points  (6 children)

              When you can't criticize a belief system, which is of course consciously adopted by the user, something is seriously wrong.

              Islam is a destroyer. It destroys every society it touches, from neighbourhoods to countries, in the developing or developed world, it doesn't matter, once infected you're going back to the seventh century.

              [–]randomchaos1[S] 1 point2 points  (5 children)

              To be fair Islamic nations in the 12th century before Genghis Khan destroyed/genocided them were the most progressive and civilized nations on Earth. Or so say most historians.

              Of course now we are seeing a unique type of invasion by immigration. They have the birthrates so they get to slowly colonize Europe and Islam prevents them from adopting Western values.

              [–]CUNTBERT_RAPINGTON 17 points18 points  (2 children)

              They were only progressive as required, they took what they liked from Indian and ancient Greek scholars to further cement their power and conquest.

              The "Islamic Golden Age" is a farce propagated to give them the benefit of the doubt. Islam has always been shit and what few success stories occurred in that region happened in spite of Islam.

              [–]SuperMike83 14 points15 points  (1 child)

              This is correct. There was an Islamic "golden age", because the Islamic rulers of the era were very secular and allowed people far more freedom than any before or since. The progress stalled as more traditional Islamic rulers came to power.

              [–]I-I__I-I 11 points12 points  (0 children)

              it's similar to how people point to Turkey (well not so much anymore, now that they're government is quickly getting more and more islamic), as an example of a Muslim nation that has modern values, as if that proves islam is compatible with Western Society.

              This leaves out the fact that their first president, who was a dictator, totally secularized the country.

              For nearly five hundred years, these rules and theories of an Arab Islamic Scholar and the interpretations of generations of lazy and good-for-nothing priests have decided the civil and criminal law of Turkey. They have decided the form of the Constitution, the details of the lives of each Turk, his food, his hours of rising and sleeping the shape of his clothes, the routine of the midwife who produced his children, what he learned in his schools, his customs, his thoughts-even his most intimate habits. This theology of an immoral Arab is a dead thing. Possibly it might have suited tribes in the desert. It is no good for modern, progressive state. God's revelation! There is no God! These are only the chains by which the priests and bad rulers bound the people down. A ruler who needs religion is a weaklings. No weaklings should rule!

              .

              In human life, you will find players of religion until the knowledge and proficiency in religion will be cleansed from all superstitions, and will be purified and perfected by the enlightenment of real science.

              - Mustafa Kemal Atatürk
              

              it took an atheist dictator to drag Turkey out of the 7th century. 70 years later, the Turks are ready to devolve.

              [–]soulmatter[🍰] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

              Maybe progressive for that time. But time must advance forward. Reversing is an energy intensive function. I know there are entities out there that wish to do it, but I don't think they truly understand what they're doing. Ultimately, we move forward and improve ourselves without mind that others should limit themselves for our own sake.

              [–][deleted] 55 points56 points  (6 children)

              Boko Haram v. Rotherham: Awareness Raising v. Awareness Lowering

              Back in April, the Islamic Boko Haram organization in the backwoods of Nigeria kidnapped 276 local black Christian schoolgirls and threatened to sell them as wives and/or sex slaves. This became a vast global story with the great and good all over the world weighing in to demonstrate their concern.

              So far all this awareness raising hasn’t, actually, helped — some girls subsequently escaped, but 217 are still unaccounted for. But that’s not the point, the point is that Awareness Was Raised, and, more importantly, that numerous celebrities were seen engaging in Raising Awareness so that your awareness of their awareness has been raised.

              In contrast, for many years in England, Pakistani pimps have been luring pubescent white Christian girls into sexual slavery; but the English Establishment — police, political, and media — responded with a long Awareness Lowering campaign. In the first decade of the 21st Century, those who protested were ignored, censored, or sent to diversity sensitivity training. The most prominent politician to take up the case a decade ago, Nick Griffin of the BNP, was put on trial twice for inciting racial hatred (but juries did not convict him).

              ‘I didn’t want to appear racist’ is the ‘I was only obeying orders’ of our age

              Political correctness was supposed to make us nicer, but in reality it just makes people stupider. Much of human intelligence comes down to pattern recognition; the whole purpose of political correctness is to stop us noticing patterns even when they stare us in the face.

              [–]Gstreetshit 24 points25 points  (1 child)

              sent to diversity sensitivity training.

              Where do they do that? The ministry of love?

              [–]soulmatter[🍰] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

              Sounds like South Park's tolerance camp.

              [–]1IVIaskerade 8 points9 points  (1 child)

              Ah yes, "Awahness" - the most important part of the response to any problem.

              Seriously though, nobody except the families of the girls gives a shit about them. The government doesn't care, they'll do as little as possible to get people to stop hassling them about it. All the celebrities using the bandwagon to be seen doing something don't care what the cause is, they only care about being seen to be doing good. All the people who saw it on the news got their five seconds of "oh, that's terrible" before the news turns to what Kim Kardashian has done in the last week and all those people who were outraged about the injustice forget about it. Nobody cares, and all the people pretending they do are worse than the people who admit it - at least they're willing to be honest.

              /rant.

              [–]Still_Redder 0 points1 point  (0 children)

              Get 4chan to make up a fake charity that gets celebs to oust themselves as idiots.

              [–]Newdist2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

              I knew who you were quoting just from the writing style.

              [–]Lt_Muffintoes 0 points1 point  (0 children)

              Boko Haram organization in the backwoods of Nigeria kidnapped 276 local black Christian schoolgirls and threatened to sell them as wives and/or sex slaves

              I almost think that there should be a legal requirement to insert the statement [the organization which simply shot hundreds of male schoolchildren and teachers] whenever the words "boko haram" are published

              [–]Endevour 12 points13 points  (2 children)

              Here's an interesting take on the story by Sargon of Akkad.

              It clearly comes across how they're able to reframe the entire case using shaming tactics.

              [–]JackGetsIt 2 points3 points  (1 child)

              This is a great video report. Thanks for the post. I like when he calls out the women who conflates Dapper Laugh's sex jokes with making fun of real rape as a 'killjoy.' I'd love to see a US reporter have the stones to say that about recent attacks on Julian Blanc.

              EDIT: QUESTION: Do you know any other redpill type youtube channels? RP news analysis type channels?

              Double Edit: You've gotta love the HUGE 'free speech' signage everywhere. There's maybe one person in the room that doesn't share the same group think. It reminds me of something from 1984.

              [–]Endevour 0 points1 point  (0 children)

              Mundane Matt and RSD Tyler on YT, I guess.

              [–]Red_Invictus 11 points12 points  (2 children)

              To me, this has nothing to do with feminism, and everything to do with proof that Britain / most of Eastern Europe has gone full blown pathetic fucking spineless beta.

              Seriously, how are average fathers and men in Britain not enraged as hell by this? Random people getting decapitated in the streets in broad daylight by fanatical Islamists wasn't enough to get them to admit they have an "immigrant problem". I guess the ultimate lesson here is society, not just people, if you allow yourself to take shit, you'll get more of it handed to you.

              On a side note, do any of us reasonable human beings think that feminists in any form, organization, or with any amount of money or power would actually do anything about this problem? I mean, even the feminists on that side of the globe, even if they were willing to mobilize and spread awareness of this bullshit, what would they do about it? It would in the end come down to the men either throwing these pedophile pieces of shit back in prison or deporting them.

              [–]randomchaos1[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

              I think they care about problems they can't fix so they can make claims about why they need feminism.

              [–]16 Endorsed ContributorGayLubeOil 10 points11 points  (5 children)

              Feminists only care about white women. If you're an attractive/wealthy white man and decide to date outside your race, feminists will collectively lose their shit because you're fetishising ethnic women.

              [–]1IVIaskerade 8 points9 points  (3 children)

              It's cultural appropriation is what it is!


              Seriously though, how are we supposed to become more racially diverse if I'm not allowed to date outside my race?

              [–]Anarcho_Rapitalist 1 point2 points  (1 child)

              How does race mixing equal "diverse"? If everyone mixed races it would create a monoculture.

              [–]1IVIaskerade 0 points1 point  (0 children)

              Oh hush dear, you're being sensible. You really think the feminists have though it through that far?

              [–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

              Women are allowed to race mix. If you're a white man, you let your wife cuckold you, then raise the child as your own.

              [–]wurding 11 points12 points  (2 children)

              Red pill for this is as follows:

              Women adopt feminist beliefs because they see a social reward. Some of the fiercest opponents of feminism in the 19th century were women, because feminism was socially unacceptable then. Since the spice girls etc, being a feminist is almost expected of women, and to be against feminism is to put one's social status at risk (as well as personal safety in some cases), something women are not inclined to do.

              The left wing hegemony in the UK means that feminists are supported when they attack white, male patriarchy, but if they criticize other demographics; such as muslims, they risk exposing themselves to public shaming, attacks from the left and social ostracisation.

              WOMEN DO WHAT IS BEST FOR THEM SOCIALLY

              [–]cocoguard 4 points5 points  (1 child)

              Socially, it can be better to not be a feminist as a young woman. The only people who really get upset with you are the rabid feminists, and as long as you don't outright say "I think feminism is stupid" you have a lot more success with family, friends/social situations, and of course, boys.

              [–]wurding 1 point2 points  (0 children)

              Maybe in some parts of Britain, but not for middle class women in the south east.

              [–][deleted]  (11 children)

              [deleted]

                [–]bluedrygrass 15 points16 points  (9 children)

                edit : if all races are identical in capabilities, why would diversity be a gift? it'd be neutral at best, but obviously a net negative, since races naturally group together and distrust other races and non-western cultures are shit.

                The truth, right there. Races are obviously not identical, negating this is only negating the evidence.

                [–]1Dev_on 0 points1 point  (8 children)

                your statemnet is a far cry different than the way it's being used in here.

                Also, someone want to explain why this has anything to do with being a man in modern society? Between the ranting about femenist hypocracy, and the circlejerk of 'fuck islam' in here, what part is going to make better men?

                [–]leopoldvonleopoldson 6 points7 points  (7 children)

                Because 'better men' try and help society. Islam does the opposite.

                [–]1Dev_on -3 points-2 points  (4 children)

                I dunno, after going to dubai, oman, turkey, and a few other islamic countries that don't make the news daily... It's no better or worse than the southern US in the more rural areas, and about the same as any mideastern US city on the rest, except for the damned heat.

                I'm all for calling out shit when you see it, but you're basically ignorant, and cherry picking shit, and you deserve to be called out on it.

                Canada just had this happen. Some crazy crackhead went nuts, found islam a few months before the shootings, and everyone blamed islam, not a crazy crackhead being crazy. Though the white christian man from moncton that went on a cop shooting spree wasn't worthy of note, even though it was only 3 months prior, and he did a lot more damage.

                [–]leopoldvonleopoldson 11 points12 points  (3 children)

                Dubai's great as long as you avert your eyes from the slaves (that's just their culture though, don't let it get you down)

                Turkey holds some great views:

                42% of Turks approve of some or most groups that attack Americans

                Turkish Ministry of Education: 1 in 4 Turks Support Honor Killings

                29% support stoning for adultery

                Edit: Quotes from the Current Prime Minister of Turkey "Mosques are our barracks, domes our helmets, minarets our bayonets, believers our soldiers" (these fuckers aren't even at war) and "Democracy is like a train, we shall get out when arrive at the station we want." (And they want to get into the EU)

                You know what the west needs? More TURKS! Another point of view is always positive /s

                I'm all for calling out shit when you see it, but you're basically ignorant, and cherry picking shit, and you deserve to be called out on it.

                How's it feel to be a liberal retard?

                Some crazy crackhead went nuts, found islam a few months before the shootings, and everyone blamed islam, not a crazy crackhead being crazy.

                Liberal media lies, by omission. His dad was Muslim and even went to Libyia in 2011 to fight with the insurgency. He didn't find Islam a few months before, he was raised with it. Of course the liberal shit media only ever mentioned his french Canadian mother. You suck.

                Though the white christian man from moncton that went on a cop shooting spree wasn't worthy of note, even though it was only 3 months prior, and he did a lot more damage.

                You and every other white guilt liberal loser do this. Whites do not have a higher prevalence in spree shooting and serial killing. The FBI debunked this, look it up. Fuck you say I cherry pick? When it comes to terrorism no one can touch the religion of peace:http://i.imgur.com/TYkFgqF.png. You're a herd animal buddy, I recommend the army for you, you may even get to interact with your new best friends (they hate you though).

                [–]3toss 7 points8 points  (0 children)

                Your edit was an unexpected revelation to me.

                [–]raceAround126 19 points20 points  (21 children)

                Everyone in the UK everywhere knew about these gangs. We saw white reporters and politicians being labelled racist to protect these people. After Stephen Lawrence, it became practically illegal to publish anything about non whites commuting crimes. Even on appeals, you could rarely describe someone as black.

                It is and was rediculous. We would rather sacrifice as many of our young girls as necessary rather than dare say that there are gangs of Asian men kidnapping white girls.

                Sadly we just can't blame feminism solely for this one. We should be holding the police and media in contempt for all of this. Every bit of it. People need to serve time for covering this shit up.

                Abd sorry. Though I loathe feminists in every way, they're not to blame here.

                [–]I-I__I-I 9 points10 points  (1 child)

                i don't think anyone blames feminism for this, i think the point is that it's strange feminists weren't move vocal and disgusted once the news broke.

                where's the #BringBackOurGirls equivalent?

                [–]2 Endorsed Contributorvengefully_yours 5 points6 points  (9 children)

                Where do you think all the political correctness bullshit came from? It sure as fuck wasn't from men.

                [–]I-I__I-I 5 points6 points  (3 children)

                The Great War was a nationalist war, which in 1915 Europe meant race war. World War 2 was another European race war, and brought near total genocide of the Jews.

                after Europe burnt to the ground twice in 30 years over race, Europeans found the idea of racial differences unpopular to say the least. opinion swung to the complete opposite position. from then on, the idea that any race was superior in any way has been a completely unacceptable thought.

                in an ironic twist, due to the unhinged immigration of any race to Europe, the next European war will again be a race war, but not fought between countries, but within.

                [–]randomchaos1[S] 7 points8 points  (1 child)

                Honestly, I think Europeans are slowly, very slowly starting to realize that they need to start defending their values and that political correctness is not necessarily a good thing. The problem is the media and education system churn out politically correct drones.

                This wouldn't be so bad is they didn't control the hearts and minds of our women. But because they do, the few males that wake up to the bigger picture get ignored and ostracized.

                [–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

                the next European war will again be a race war, but not fought between countries, but within.

                Where's /r/PanicHistory when you need them?

                [–]Hatorader -1 points0 points  (4 children)

                The political correctness machine is kept in motion by the Jews, who have so much power because Hitler failed. The Jews propagate all this while they sit firmly at the top watching us get run over and fighting amongst ourselves and having to deal with all the diversity that's been seeping into beautiful white civilization. And Ironically, the Jews are the least tolerant of any group of people, no one gets in unless you're Jewish.

                And by the way, Hitler knew all of this was happening and would happen.

                [–]randomchaos1[S] 2 points3 points  (3 children)

                Meh, that's debatable, the politically correct machine is kept in motion by everyone. At this point everyone who wants to be seen as a victim and get victim benefits is powering the PC machine. I can see why Jews would get the credit for starting the PC machine though.

                Consider Jewish history:

                Jews were kicked out of almost every European nation. They were successful IN SPITE of all the hate and persecution against them - all over Europe, not just a few places. They did a lot of things out of desperation. Jews were considered worse than blacks during segregation and it wasn't because they were failing... This went on for many centuries. Consider the selective pressure they underwent. I'm saying this is probably what caused Jewish intellectuals to pursue politically correct policies in the first place.

                They were initially in favor of communism because they were desperate to get equality. It ended up being a horrible mistake on their part. Liberals of the era made communism a reality, not Jews... The irony is that a lot of Jewish intellectuals were killed and prosecuted under communist Russia. (all intellectual were) Jews in general were persecuted in the Soviet Union and IN SPITE of that managed to get high positions. I'd assume most Jews today are hardcore capitalists.

                It is a unique oddity that they are in control of so much capital and media but I wouldn't say there is some nefarious plot to overthrow white people. White guilt is a thing a lot of white people pushed on to themselves as a result of WW2 and Imperialism and are now suffering for it because they absorbed incompatible cultures.

                Also consider 2 more things. 1 - Jews have probably the most tragic history out of any human culture. 2 - White people started WW1 AND WW2. This is what ended the Western Golden Age. White people fucked themselves harder than any Jew or nation on this earth ever could. Blaming Jews for such catastrophic events is unrealistic.

                Also, I don't really see how Jews are not White people at this point. The race mixing has been happening for 1200 years... The distinction at this point is purely cultural. I honestly don't even understand how Jewish culture survived.

                Anyone can convert to Judaism and anyone can move to Israel. (From what I understand)

                [–]Hatorader 0 points1 point  (2 children)

                Holy shit I learned a lot from your response. And yeah we can convert but not be accepted. And I agree there isn't a plot, but that's how well it's run, that they just "are". Once I heard an American Jew proclaim brotherhood with an Israeli Jew and the Israeli Jew responded with, "We are not brothers.", so you make a good point. I like Israelis, but they are not welcoming to outsiders, they're smart.

                [–]randomchaos1[S] 0 points1 point  (1 child)

                If this is true, they are being retarded and doing it to their own detriment. The whole point of the Jewish state was so that Jews have a place to go if they get prosecuted. Which happened surprisingly often in history. That's how they got Israel to begin with.

                I think the majority of Israel would accept Jewish refugees. I agree with your observation that a good portion of Jews seems elitist, but as you yourself said, a lot of them are also liberal and push the liberal agenda, Jews are diverse people with a lot of different motives.

                Also updated my other response.

                [–]Hatorader 0 points1 point  (0 children)

                [–]TheSliceman 0 points1 point  (8 children)

                Feminists are a subset of Marxists, and Marxists, social and political, ARE to blame.

                Also Jesus christ, the UK sounds like hell in earth for anyone who is white or male.

                [–]raceAround126 2 points3 points  (1 child)

                It is consistently not very white male friendly.

                Even in the workplace, when making new hires, I'm consistently told company to company to find female or non-white applicants favorably. A common trend in tech these days. At one company I was asked to explain why my department was staffed entirely by white males. The irony was, the company branch was based in deepest rural Essex... there simply were no non-white people around! I couldn't very well saunter off into town and start seeking out non-white people asking them if they wanted a job! The further irony was both females who were in my team were promoted out! In one case especially quite unfairly!

                It's liberalism x bureaucracy catalyzed by a sensationalist media and backed by scared politicians and lawkeepers that keep it this way with a whole bunch of "Let's not get involved, we need to convince everyone we're diverse" going on.

                [–]TheSliceman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

                At one company I was asked to explain why my department was staffed entirely by white males.

                "Well, see, sir, um, well its because white males kick ass in the tech industry and I was under the impression that you wanted a kick-ass company."

                [–][deleted] -1 points0 points  (1 child)

                Feminists are a subset of Marxists

                This is factually incorrect, there are plenty of feminists who aren't Marxist. They're all left-wingers of some shade or another, but feminism is a purely social ideology, Marxism is socioeconomic.

                [–]TheSliceman 1 point2 points  (0 children)

                This is factually incorrect

                No its not.

                https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cultural_Marxism

                https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dm3FlbUf5gA

                https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fNx2SLJVwy8

                https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n51kdAFPN7U

                At their root, both are about taking something, whether it be freedom or wealth, from someone by using a collective force.

                They're all left-wingers of some shade or another

                And where did left-wingers come from? Where was all your leftism pre-1850s?

                feminism is a purely social ideology, Marxism is socioeconomic.

                Yup, feminist never have anything to say about the workplace demographics.

                I didnt say they were identical, I said it was a subset, which it is.

                [–]justhadcesc 7 points8 points  (0 children)

                I agree with the OP. It's outrageous that stuff like ''Feminist Cat Calling'' get so much more media coverage compared to this deplorable case. I am a South Asian (from Nepal) and honestly, these scumbags give ''brown'' people a bad name. Something similar happens back in my home country Nepal. Indians come to Nepal and lure young Nepalese girls with the promise of a job in big Indian cities and then sell them for as low as $250. Tens of thousands of our girls are stuck in Indian brothels as sexual slaves, often with HIV.

                [–]netgrey 54 points55 points  (30 children)

                The Lie we've been sold that all cultures are equal is killing civilization. European culture frankly is better than all others, but because people have been brain washed to think only white men can do evil, we are ripping it down.

                Yes, we all know the fucked up things that have happened, but at the end of the day it's still produced the greatest knowledge, freedom, and technology the world has ever seen.

                Who is going to maintain the free Internet when feminists, Muslims, and communist Chinese rule the world? The decline has come.

                [–]LeGrandDiableBlanc 6 points7 points  (2 children)

                The free internet will eventually be made of up loosely connected groups of relatively tech savvy people on TOR, or whatever the future equivalent will be.

                [–]CUNTBERT_RAPINGTON 0 points1 point  (1 child)

                Which is not a sustainable long term solution and will gradually wither away to nothing.

                [–]LeGrandDiableBlanc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

                It will remain indefinitely, but it will become niche. Certainly not a mainstream thing.

                [–]1Dev_on 21 points22 points  (19 children)

                Actually, china, and the arabic ones have that mantle, for almost the entire period of history, with the exception of greek/roman times, and the enlightenment

                I get your sentiment, but it does a disservice to remember that not even a generation ago, european culture was propping up dictators that murdered people en masse.

                Theres more people in jail in America than in China... something to think about when you talk freedoms. It just hasn't made its way to the suburbs

                [–]hairaware 3 points4 points  (4 children)

                I'd say America definitely had a period where they were the greatest in technology and innovation. China still just steals everyone else shit. Sure maybe they have their own personal advances as well but a large part of it is built off of stolen material.

                [–]1Dev_on 11 points12 points  (1 child)

                I lump in america with europe.

                Also russia stole everyones shit during the cold war. But britan stole most of it's high tech textile manufacturing from India too, so thats not an argument IMO

                Don't forget europe stole gunpowder off China, and basically ran with it. Back then they had political sophistication, beauocracy and other advances that were rivalled nowhere. The islamic world is both the reason we have almost any classical knowledge (since the catholics were burning it down) and most of our basic scientific principles which allowed the enlightenment to flourish to begin with.

                Basically everyones butmad because this is the current heirarchy of tech advancement. It's the wests turn. And america right now.

                Look, I'm not arguing to argue, but the systems of collective knowledge aren't simple, and it's been a worldwide push. Just hope you don't live long enough for another culture to take it away from America...

                And keep in mind, once you get away from the desparate, third world despotism type islamic countries, they function basically similar to how they do everywhere else. Saudi arabia is a backward kingdom, with rich oil baron princes and a poverty stricken class, and indian slaves. turkey is a modern society with a decent middle class. You'll get about as much use comparing them as comparing a new york burrough with butfuck mississippi, or former eastern block shithole.

                And I guarantee you'll find plenty of examples of western culture being 'barbaric' there as well, if you look.

                [–]Heuristics 0 points1 point  (0 children)

                since the catholics were burning it down

                nope.

                The reason it came from the Arabs was that they were the closest (they had conquered Spain). If the Arabs were not available they would just have been gotten from Greece instead, Greece wrote it, they were still around there but Greece is further from the new development of higher education that starts happening around that time.

                [–]AchillesOtherLeg 2 points3 points  (0 children)

                Really speaking it was the Germans who cracked our way into the space age. The Americans mopped up.

                [–]Arctoriustyrilian 1 point2 points  (0 children)

                America had a period where every other nation that could compete with them was recovering from WW2 that devastated economies all over the world. The US on the other hand was geographically isolated and had built up massive manufacturing infrastructure to support the war effort that was then converted into manufacturing jobs for returning vets and the new female working class.

                America's hold on the world economy began to loosen once recovery from the war outside of America reached the point that other nations could compete again.

                [–]CUNTBERT_RAPINGTON 1 point2 points  (4 children)

                China has been mired in ass-backwards Legalist Confucian bullshit which has resisted any sort of innovation or creativity for millenia. Way too much cultural baggage to be the future of this planet.

                [–]1Dev_on 6 points7 points  (3 children)

                they are building green cities from the ground up. Theres 10 chineese cities the size of New york that are <10 years old.

                Theres a lot of problems, but a lot coming out of there too. Their version of facebook is huge compared to ours

                [–]smokeybehr 7 points8 points  (0 children)

                They're green as long as nobody is living in them, and they're so poorly built, nobody wants to.

                [–]CUNTBERT_RAPINGTON 1 point2 points  (1 child)

                They are building empty cities. Cities with millions of units that sit unoccupied and will never be occupied due to real estate speculators and flimsy construction.

                The Chinese economy will implode before this decade is out and it will be absolutely brutal for all parties involved.

                [–]1Dev_on 0 points1 point  (0 children)

                CUNTBERT_RAPINGTON

                I don't know if I can trust your economic predictions

                [–]netgrey 0 points1 point  (5 children)

                Is China more free than the USA, yes or no? HAs the technology the west has produced far greater than any in human history, yes or no?

                [–]1Dev_on 5 points6 points  (0 children)

                Free in which way? it's an expansive term.

                [–]dakevs -5 points-4 points  (3 children)

                Didn't you read one of the comments stating that knowledge on a whole has come from all parts of the world. Different cultures? It just so happens for the past few hundred years it's been Western European culture that is "bringing it", for lack of a better term.

                Chinese created paper. Gunpowder. The Arabs created our current numbering system, etc. etc.

                [–]I-I__I-I 0 points1 point  (0 children)

                the Arabs created our current numbering system

                not true. it was indians.

                the Incas also had base 10 numbers... in a way. they didn't have written numbers, but they had this. each string represents a power of 10, and 0 - 9 knots were tied into the appropriate string to represent the quantity of that power of 10.

                on innovation, Europe wins by a lot.

                [–]netgrey -2 points-1 points  (1 child)

                Typical SJW name calling and shaming instead of responding to the argument. You're the one trying to cast this into a racial argument. I'm talking about culture, not race.

                [–]dakevs 7 points8 points  (0 children)

                I am responding to the argument. Your cognitive reading skills are lacking.

                [–]Shotgun_Sentinel 0 points1 point  (0 children)

                Actually, china, and the arabic ones have that mantle, for almost the entire period of history, with the exception of greek/roman times, and the enlightenment

                The Arabs stole their knowledge from the places they conquered, the Chinese fell behind in the 1800s, since then it was a white mans world. Its slowly becoming a chinese world again.

                Theres more people in jail in America than in China... something to think about when you talk freedoms. It just hasn't made its way to the suburbs

                That's because China executes people more, also don't trust the numbers china releases. Further more there are very few European Americans in the prison system, so that really isn't a hit against Euroe civilization.

                [–]smokeybehr 0 points1 point  (1 child)

                Theres more people in jail in America than in China...

                In America, we try to rehabilitate criminals. In China, they work them to death and tend to execute them for what we would consider minor offenses.

                [–]1Dev_on 2 points3 points  (0 children)

                K, we are digressing, but thats bullshit and you know it.

                I see no evidence about serious rehabilitation. Are ex-cons allowed to vote? Not everywhere. how about negative concequences, after serving ones time? take a guess how that goes?

                I don't get the impression (and I know 50 is a lot of states, so it's obviously different in many of them) that in a lot of them, it's anything but an economic death sentance.

                No one is calling China Shangri-la here or anything, but I'm just pointing out this 'us better than them' crap everyone here is spouting misses out on a lot of homegrown abuses... The kind of thing that should knock someone off their soapbox before the enlightened are screaming at the 'barbarian hoards'

                [–]Joxemiarretxe 1 point2 points  (2 children)

                The Chinese are hardly communist anymore.

                [–]DrXaos 0 points1 point  (1 child)

                They are not Marxist, but they are still virulently Leninist.

                [–]stringer_bell3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

                How is European culture better when British MPs were raping children to death and getting away with it, with the authorities and people in power looking the other way?

                [–]ShekelBanker 13 points14 points  (0 children)

                See OP, these girls were raped by Pakis (seriously, British codeword for Pakis/Indians is Asians, while Chinese/Japs/Koreans East Asians) and it's not politically correct to bash on the Pakis for that.

                (sarcasm intended)

                [–]cowboyhaze 6 points7 points  (0 children)

                Cultural Marxism hard at work.

                [–][deleted] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

                I have been screaming about this since it happened. I even wrote directly to 'feminists' - including one from the UK. They simply do not care and the one I wrote from the UK seemed kind of scared to write about it. This was when I decided that modern feminism was bullshit and that Islamic apologists were as bad as the rapists.

                [–]Dr_Gabe_Lackman 5 points6 points  (0 children)

                A) Feminism exist to criticize the west as part of cultural Marxist critical theory.

                B) It's easier to get away with throwing red paint on an old woman in a fur coat than it is to throw red paint on a biker in a leather vest.

                This is why video games are muhsogny while we must be tolerant of other cultures.

                [–]1Jaereth 2 points3 points  (0 children)

                They have to be white males for the fatminists to make a fuss about anything. White males are the only group middle class white females can get away with criticizing publicly.

                Brings me back to a great article I read on here once about "the worst thing that's ever happened to them" or something of that sort.

                [–]thinktankman 2 points3 points  (0 children)

                Hierarchy of social justice

                [–]JohnPeel 2 points3 points  (0 children)

                Feminism is just a subset of Marxism.

                The main priorities of Marxism override the Feminist ones. In this case the risk of offending ethnic minorities outweighs the raping of young girls, so is therefore ignored by Feminists.

                [–]Idontlikekarmawhores 2 points3 points  (0 children)

                Can we forget about the "feminist" for a bit and think about the issue that europe are facing with these wave of middle easter immigrants?

                I m south american but i lived in norther europe and its insane the shit pakistan/irakis/iranian people get away with and the government doesn't do shit. You cant even say what race was the rapist in sweden

                [–]Karol754 25 points26 points  (0 children)

                Live with monkeys then complain about being covered in shit. Damn UK.

                [–]Seiju 2 points3 points  (1 child)

                As the NR columnist puts it, these are just not the rapes you are looking for.

                Of course feminism is about power. Worse, it is about depriving its owners of it, rather than genuinely using it. Feminists don't have a clue about how to use power. They just want it for the sake of it. Hence the destruction they sow.

                In this quest for power, racism is the supreme exclusion criteria. It means social death. It is to the social game what the first law of robotics is to robotics. It overrules misogyny or rape culture or any gender-related topic. Had the perpetrators been white males, this case would have made the headlines for six months.

                [–]laserdicks 1 point2 points  (0 children)

                I disagree that racism will always overrule misogyny or gender - in my opinion, 'feminists' (for lack of a more accurate term) use these concepts as simple resources. Assets in an argument. And these resources can rise and fall in market value just like tea and coffee, for example; voting in a black president probably took a bit of value out of racism in the U.S.

                What the words racist and misogynist actually mean doesn't matter to them, they're just ammunition that can be fired in certain situations and at certain targets.

                [–]GreatWalker 2 points3 points  (0 children)

                feminism is for feminists, not for women

                [–]goofproofacorn 1 point2 points  (0 children)

                In all seriousness this type of stuff is why otherwise good people go to jail. As a father I would be plotting how get away with murder if this happened to my child and the police did nothing. The movie taken showcases how I feel about this perfectly. The police should be locked up also for failure to keep the community safe because of some bull shit racism. Basically youre automatically guilty of rape if you are white. If your skin color is darker though you get a free pass.

                [–]123throwawayo 1 point2 points  (1 child)

                lullllz redpill finally awakening and going deeper. let us not see women as we would like, but as they are. let us not see people as we would like, but as they are. http://youtu.be/5YsdbhIbZoc

                http://shoebat.com/2014/03/17/actual-literal-islamic-human-slaughterhouses-christians-discovered/ WARNING: second link may be most gruesome thing ever. live leak links weak stomachs avoid

                Although I have no confidence in the reddit hivemind seeing the light on race and religion it is amazing the ground we've covered on women. Those that realize the redpill has only really scratched the surface of reality know.

                [–]randomchaos1[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

                Islam is trying to use nationalism the way Europeans used it in WW1 and WW2 and the West seems blind to it.

                China and Russia are currently trying to do the same.

                The West has technological superiority but our cultures and traditions have been deconstructed and our women have been blinded by feminist/marxist ideology.

                Our birthrates are dwindling and before long no one will be around to support the idea of human rights and rule of law. I lack faith in 3rd world immigrants because only a small portion of them adopt western principles without going full marxist.

                Most of them don't understand or even know about the Russian revolution. They don't know what happens when rule of law disappears. They don't understand that our civilization will be reduced to a bunch of impoverished gangs vying for power ripe for conquest by greater powers.

                Ironically these marxist/socialist/feminist intellectuals will be the first ones to get executed. They will be the first ones to lose their freedoms. This is what happened in the Soviet Union, all the progressives who fought for the regime change and all the intellectuals who convinced people that a regime change was necessary in most cases were killed as soon as they served their purpose.

                At worst we'll be minorities in our countries accused of apartheid. And if South Africa is any indication of the future, there is a possibility of a white genocide.

                [–]aa223 1 point2 points  (0 children)

                Well these feminists are in a "this is all about me" mindset. Since this isn't about them then it isn't worthy of notoriety by them.

                [–]raiseurT 1 point2 points  (0 children)

                And even if they do address it, it won't come with the same rage and emotion that it would if a privledged white chick got complimented on the sidewalk mid-day.

                Feminists get it though, they get that people of different tribes are, well, different. That's why they rarely comment on sharia law and islam's treatment of women in general. The problem is that these are the same people that spout the whole "we're all human" diversity bullcrap.

                [–]damflite 1 point2 points  (0 children)

                Well in the muslim's defense it is just part of their culture /s

                [–]Helmut_Newton 1 point2 points  (0 children)

                Unfortunately, this is par for the course for modern-day feminists. If it doesn't fit the "all white men are evil" myth, they just ignore it.

                [–]Ududude 3 points4 points  (1 child)

                Don't be a racist shitlord OP! Just because they are Muslims and worship a prophet who raped his nine year old wife does not mean that there is a relationship between rape and Islam!

                [–]1IVIaskerade 1 point2 points  (0 children)

                Listen asshat, that 9-year old consented, so it can't be rape! Never mind that she probably just wanted to go outside and play and is incapable of understanding the implications of such consent (and should therefore be incapable of giving it meaningfully) doesn't mean she was raped! God! Could you be any more culturally insensitive?

                /s in case that wasn't clear.

                [–]220090 4 points5 points  (3 children)

                This. THIS is what we need to be constantly reminded of. This kind of evil is also a product of feminism and this alone is enough to make me want to have a

                /#punchafeminist

                twitter campaign. Feminism is evil, despicable, and destroys boys AND girls. They don't give a rat's ass about protecting anyone except their ugly fat asses.

                [–]1IVIaskerade 0 points1 point  (1 child)

                Formatting note - you need to put a backslash (bottom left of the keyboard) in front of the hashtag for it to appear like this # - otherwise you get that wierd line under the sentence after it.

                With the slash, you get #punchafeminist

                [–]stimulated_narcolept 0 points1 point  (0 children)

                Do it, start a campaign. Don't just complain from the sidelines. We'll help you out.

                [–]begege 3 points4 points  (1 child)

                That's because feminism is only tangentially about women and mostly about communist takeover.

                https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3dQVUiEjpw8

                [–]balalasaurus 1 point2 points  (4 children)

                This is disgusting but it also shows that not only is feminism predicated on playing the victim card, cries of victimization must easily show who the transgressor is and who the victims are.

                In Nigeria, it's easy to point to Boko Haram because religious extremism. In the States it's easy to point to a young male because patriarchy.

                In this case though, where problems of ethnic assimilation and cultural depravity in the face of political correctness come into the fray, it's more difficult to point a finger and say "X did it" so feminists opt for the easy way out and pretend it did not happen.

                Feminism - taking the easy way out whenever possible.

                [–]1IVIaskerade 0 points1 point  (3 children)

                You know what the problem with feminism is? It's not that they're pointing fingers and saying "x is bad". It's that they're not offering (realistic or sane) solutions. If they were, we'd probably be more amenable to them, but saying "Religious extremism is bad" without "and here's what can be done" is just the same as a child stamping its foot and shouting "I don't like it. Change it."

                [–]Red_Invictus 1 point2 points  (2 children)

                Exactly, well said, couldn't agree more. This is why we avoid discussion with them like the plague because the only winning move is not to play. No matter what their grievance is, legitimate or bullshit, they have nothing constructive to do about it.

                I made a separate post in the thread here; "On a side note, do any of us reasonable human beings think that feminists in any form, organization, or with any amount of money or power would actually do anything about this problem? I mean, even the feminists on that side of the globe, even if they were willing to mobilize and spread awareness of this bullshit, what would they do about it? It would in the end come down to the men either throwing these pedophile pieces of shit back in prison or deporting them."

                [–]1IVIaskerade -1 points0 points  (1 child)

                It would in the end come down to the men either throwing these pedophile pieces of shit back in prison or deporting them

                Frankly, I can't see what's wrong with a good old-fashioned lynching. Mob justice is often the wrong solution, but occasionally it has its uses.

                [–]Red_Invictus -1 points0 points  (0 children)

                Couldn't agree more, again. I'm happy to see that Russia is on the right track at least, they just approved chemical castration for repeat offense pedophiles (over 90% of their convicted pedophiles are repeat offenders).

                It just amazes me the difference between a country like Russia who is willing to admit they have a problem, and make a hard, possibly unpopular, possibly seen as "brutal" decision in order to actually deal with said problem. And then on the other side of the coin you have Britain's government turning a blind eye, and recommending more "awareness training".

                Sometimes there are evil enough human actions that merit the most brutal of punishments, this is definitely one of them.

                [–]Thizzlebot 1 point2 points  (0 children)

                This is why I always claim to be a womens rights activist over a "feminist". I truly believe women should be treated equal and right but femicunts are more interested in having zero responsibility for being whores than they care about women actually getting beaten and having real problems in other countries.

                [–]SmilePeregrine -1 points0 points  (9 children)

                They were horrible, and its a monumental fuck-up on Rotherham's part. But a 1 minute search finds a column in the Guardian, written by a feminist, condemning those very rapes and calling for more current investigations. Not really a 'deafening silence'?

                [–][deleted]  (1 child)

                [deleted]

                  [–]SmilePeregrine -1 points0 points  (0 children)

                  I don't know about that one. But there was no silence on Rotherham where I am (London, UK); it was front page news for weeks.

                  [–]csehszlovakze 5 points6 points  (3 children)

                  It is a deafening silence compared to gamergate or Matt Taylor's shirt.

                  [–]Shaft-of-Patriarchy 1 point2 points  (2 children)

                  There may be a significant geographical element to that. I'm going to assume, politely, that you are from outside the UK.

                  Here, gamergate never really made much traction in the mainstream news. A few articles here and there but certainly it never came up on the national televised news. Matt Taylors shirt I've never seen criticised anywhere other than on links posted from Reddit, it got no mainstream traction here.

                  The Rotherham rapes however, headline news on every major television network news programme for quite a while

                  [–]csehszlovakze 1 point2 points  (0 children)

                  I am from Hungary, so you may understand why I don't really check mainstream television here, or anything operated by the government or its "friends". Neither Twitter, but both cases exploded there mostly, and on other sites slaves to feminists (TRP banned sites). This? Nope.

                  [–]randomchaos1[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

                  I heard nothing of this in the US. In fact this article got downvotes on worldnews.

                  [–]1IVIaskerade 2 points3 points  (0 children)

                  Here's the thing - it was front page news for a while, and all the papers were full of righteous indignation that nothing had been done - but I didn't see many that were pointing out that the fear of being labelled racist or islamophobic had stopped the police from investigating sooner or more thoroughly, or condemning those who would call the police racist because they're doing their job.

                  Also, that article is talking about the abuse of children by celebrities in the latter half of the 1900s, not the Rotherham gangs. She mentions them once in passing and then goes right back to Jimmy Saville and the rest.

                  [–]randomchaos1[S] 0 points1 point  (1 child)

                  Over one THOUSAND CHILDREN got raped in 16 years, this is like 9/11 with less casualties.

                  Think about how bad pedophilia is in our culture. Think about how bad rape is in our culture. If this isn't a deafening silence I don't know what is.

                  [–]SmilePeregrine 0 points1 point  (0 children)

                  Yes sure, and it was front page news, for weeks, as said above. Do you want 1000 times the articles compared to the other cases talked about here? One per rape? Don't be ridiculous. They were taken together, and written about plenty. Maybe you didn't see the articles because you don't read a wide range of literature? If you want to base TRP on bullshit then fair enough, go fool yourself; alternatively you could use your brain, call out inequality/double-standards where it does exist, but not make shit up like this. And 9/11!? The attacks killed 2,996 people and caused at least $10 billion in damage in a few hours, 1000 over 16 years is in no way comparable. Underage rape isn't really comparable to ideologically fueled murder. Again, ridiculous.

                  [–]jdoe5 0 points1 point  (0 children)

                  Laughed out loud at the top comment: "....but she wrote an article about what was happening ten years ago!". Girl, ten years ago cell phones barely existed.

                  [–]Transmigratory 0 points1 point  (0 children)

                  This is one thing I never understood about this "movement". Their followers claim it isn't a joke, yet they ignore shit like this.

                  [–]trp-throw 0 points1 point  (0 children)

                  Let me get this straight, people did waste time and effort to invent a rape-drug detector (something women should be thrilled about) and feminists were outraged because it encourages rape culture?

                  I have been hearing this buzzword quite a lot these days, does rape culture mean what I think it means?

                  Anyway we see yet again how irrational and hypocritical these so called feminists are.

                  [–]more_potatoes 0 points1 point  (0 children)

                  Did you actually fact check this? I am guessing not: A quick Google search shows that all the "feminist" websites listed on the national review article have, in reality, covered this case.

                  [–]AutomaticJack320 -1 points0 points  (4 children)

                  "It was completely ignored because liberals were afraid of being called racist."

                  Sauce...?

                  [–]raceAround126 1 point2 points  (3 children)

                  Experience living in this country. It is very much a case of this.

                  Our Stephen Lawrence was a lot like your OJ Simpson in terms of social effects.