top 200 commentsshow all 352

[–]16 Endorsed ContributorGayLubeOil 125 points126 points  (134 children)

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Posting on purple pill debate has taught me that many of our detractors dont actually want a debate, they want to reduce the level of discourse through intentional misunderstanding to a pointless emotional argument.

[–]2 Mredpillschool[S] 73 points74 points  (116 children)

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

The logical extrapolation of their entire argument is "nothing is knowable, everything is magic." There will be no productive debate taking place there.

[–]LifterofThings 49 points50 points  (28 children)

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Debates go as follows:

RP: grass is green

BP: well green is a combination of blue and yellow. Grass is OBVIOUSLY not blue, but if you want to insist that it is because you're insecure, do so with my love and blessing!

RP: that isn't what I said and you know it, but if you'd like to continue your willful ignorance, do so with my love and blessing!

Mod: HOW DARE YOU CALL ANOTHER DEBATER WILLFUL AND IGNORANT! YOU ARE BANNED!

[–]carrotplanter 8 points9 points  (1 child)

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

RP: grass is green

BP: well... bla bla bla

lmao well put. At times I'm even impressed at how trp detractors can come up with anything just to be able to put up an argument of any sort. Meanwhile, we're sitting here and not really trying, we're just stating the obvious.

[–]SavantTrain 3 points4 points  (0 children)

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

You can only state things that are so obvious for so long. If they don't get it after a few times, they either don't want to or can't.

[–]alphabetmod -4 points-3 points  (25 children)

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

YOU ARE BANNED!

I don't know about that part. We, the mods don't just willy nilly ban people.

[–]Endorsed Contributortheubercuber 0 points1 point  (7 children)

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Through a couple throwaway accounts I have objective evidence of red pillers being censored and shamed for insults, while my throwaway blue pill account insults RPers literally in the same chain of comments (and also gets reported) and action is not taken against the "blue pill female" tag. I thought cfroflcopter was to blame until I saw AlphaBet don his white armor in PM with my BP throwaway.

[–]alphabetmod 1 point2 points  (6 children)

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Lol, so you should be able to show a screenshot of that right, since it was in pm and pm's can't be deleted?

[–]Endorsed Contributortheubercuber 6 points7 points  (5 children)

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

A couple days ago I 'argued' with myself in a thread and both of the throwaways insulted each other and called the other (and their supporters) stupid. I reported both and the rp one was deleted. So the permalink from the report won't work, and I can't find a archived copy of it. However I can find the pm of you saying 'sorry for the trouble, I took care of it' or something along those lines while responding to the blue pill woman who was called stupid immediately after she called someone stupid.

And then of course the blue pill woman's insult is still posted, despite the report and request for removal.

[–][deleted]  (3 children)

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

[deleted]

    [–]Endorsed Contributortheubercuber 1 point2 points  (0 children)

    sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

    No I did my experiment in response to that exchange as a test.

    [–][deleted] -2 points-1 points  (16 children)

    sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

    I'd say our ban-list is considerably shorter than any other RP/BP sub, and we generally give quite a few chances.

    [–]Endorsed Contributortheubercuber 2 points3 points  (12 children)

    sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

    Through a couple throwaway accounts I have objective evidence of red pillers being censored and shamed for insults, while my throwaway blue pill account insults RPers literally in the same chain of comments (and also gets reported) and action is not taken against the "blue pill female" tag. I thought cfroflcopter was to blame until I saw AlphaBet don his white armor in PM with my BP throwaway.

    [–]Endorsed ContributorRedSunBlue 4 points5 points  (1 child)

    sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

    #shotsfired

    [–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (9 children)

    sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

    If you can pull up some links (and screenshot the PMs) and send them to the modmail, I would like to see what is going on.

    [–]Endorsed Contributortheubercuber 1 point2 points  (8 children)

    sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

    What would it change? These exchanges literally happened at the same time and with the same exact insults and elicited two very different responses so obviously there is knowledge of the root problem.

    I have to risk giving up the sweet ironic karma when I troll stupid things and tag on 'men suck' on PPD. I don't get much free time anymore and that's a fast laugh.

    I'm not convinced you would do anything than grunble 'we'll do better'

    [–]Endorsed Contributoraaron_the_just 19 points20 points  (2 children)

    sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

    And that's getting really tiresome. For example, romantic love is easy to understand, and it works the same way in most people regardless of culture or upbringing. Psychologists have researched it and documented it extensively.

    Some RP wisdom over on RPW today:

    "For whatever reason women are extremely emotionally and psychologically attached to the beliefs that they are unique, mysterious and unknowable and that love and sex aren't able to be understood and systematized like any other knowledge."

    And back in our own sub:

    "You don't know what you want until you understand it cognitively. Sure, emotions can help you in making some decisions, but your emotions alone aren't going to get you what you want. That goes for men and women. If you try to fulfill all of your biological desires without ever taking the time to think about what you want and how to get, you probably aren't going end up very satisfied. You can get a taste of it, but you're going to end up disappointed."

    This desire to believe in magic is tiresome. Oddly enough, it mostly comes from people who would be adamant about how they don't believe in foolish things like God, religion, and so forth.

    [–]11411181 3 points4 points  (1 child)

    sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

    Humans have a proclivity to want to believe in a false idol, even if people reject the ones set up for them by society.

    [–]Endorsed Contributoraaron_the_just -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

    sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

    Yep. Which is why you're best off just going with the one society's structured around, rather than going off and starting your own goofy thing.

    Women should adjust their religious beliefs to be aligned with their man's.

    [–]2RedPill4LYF 4 points5 points  (83 children)

    sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

    I wondered why you were trying so persistently for a while, but it seems you guys reached the same conclusions I did. My other account got banned when I managed to get the whole mod team trolling me in PMs. PurplePill is just another blue pill front.

    [–]widec 3 points4 points  (0 children)

    sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

    They should just call it the indigo pill because it certainly favors one colour a bit more.

    [–]2 Mredpillschool[S] 1 point2 points  (80 children)

    sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

    Honestly, it was kinda fun to watch the different mindsets clash. But, no, nothing quality will happen there.

    [–]2RedPill4LYF 2 points3 points  (79 children)

    sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

    I noticed when I started making headway with someone, one of the mods always had to butt in and started in with loaded and leading questions that made it sound like I was Hitler, so I started calling them out for being trolls. Didn't take long for them to get into private pissing contests with me. Eventually one of them got too frustrated and pulled the ban trigger, but not before attempting to shame me with the list of shaming techniques. I think some blue pillers really don't understand irony at all.

    [–]2 Mredpillschool[S] 9 points10 points  (46 children)

    sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

    Hey don't you understand? They're there for balanced debate. That's why the head moderator of the red pill is.. banned? Oh, guess they didn't want to hear our side. Lol.

    [–]2RedPill4LYF 6 points7 points  (6 children)

    sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

    That whole sub is so unwelcoming to red pillers, it doesn't surprise me at all they banned you. The bias is apparent from the get go. It's funny how blue pillers are as antagonistic as possible with their replies and nobody bats an eyelash, but a red piller being rational and calm with their reasoning gets dogpiled and ridiculed and passive aggressively threatened with a ban instantly.

    Most of them think they win a debate by throwing up links to studies that are clearly false but validate their delusional point of views. No civility whatsoever.

    [–]2 Mredpillschool[S] 5 points6 points  (4 children)

    sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

    The problem is that most of their arguments boil down to who has the best semi-related study that might suggest one way or another something tangentially related. Anything that they can disprove weakly is on their side, and anything that can't be proven 100% is used against us.

    Couple that with the fact that they really do spend a lot of time antagonizing and trolling, it was no surprise to me that they tried to get me banned as quickly as possible.

    [–]2RedPill4LYF 1 point2 points  (3 children)

    sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

    That's exactly what happened to me. Any time I started sharing my own experiences, I heard the phrase, "anecdotal evidence doesn't count" followed by more links to super fringe feminist blogs. At one point I had to push my chair back from the desk and just thought, how is it fair these people can claim they're winning an argument over the internet when all they are doing is searching for literally whatever argument they want to make on Google and linking whatever pops up into the debate like they actually came up with it themselves.

    I don't know about you, but I'm a see it and believe it kinda guy. I didn't believe anything about the red pill I wasn't sure about until I tested it myself. So, there I am, trying to explain my experiences in reality land, and these motherfuckers are screeching that I'm not a scientist so I can't be right while copy/pasting drivel they clearly just cherry picked for the sake of making me look wrong. How the hell is it really any different to link to a study nobody has heard of or recognizes or share a personal experience making the same argument? The pretentious smug superior attitudes didn't help their cases any either.

    It just makes you wonder how can any of them honestly expect me to go, "Oh wait, you're right. Men and women are all completely equal. Not all women really truly are like that, even though you're doing exactly what the theory talks about right now. Your snide witticisms and community college grade essays you didn't read or write yourselves have shown me the light. Yes, I am the asshole."

    [–]totorox 2 points3 points  (2 children)

    sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

    these motherfuckers are screeching that I'm not a scientist so I can't be right

    Fallacy of appeal to authority. Overused by liberal militants.

    [–]BRINGMETHEBITCHES 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

    They are biased and cannot see it or admit it.

    [–]Spartacus321 2 points3 points  (38 children)

    sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

    Dude, come on. How many chances did we give you? How long did we let you break from being cordial before we banned you? One of the things Purple did was ask for your help in an official capacity, and also one of the first things Purple did was to thank you for contributing and told you if you needed help on the sub to come to us.

    Of the users who cared to answer our survey, half were red pill. We most definitely want to hear your side, and your side is heard. Mods try to keep both sides from destroying the debate environment. Given the nature of the sub, it's far from perfect and emotions run high, but neither side's user base is perfect; both tend to make things difficult and both claim we have a bias for the opposite side.

    One of the "heads" of the blue pill (SpermJackalope) is banned as well. We don't ban to silence one side, we ban because a single user is making things difficult.

    I helped build purple pill debate because I like this topic. I'd browsed the redpill for months before helping make the sub. Every mod likes this subject too and I can promise you none of them actually like banning people. We want to have everyone contribute, but we won't apologize for getting rid of people who make it difficult for everyone.

    [–]2 Mredpillschool[S] 5 points6 points  (30 children)

    sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

    but we won't apologize for getting rid of people who make it difficult for everyone.

    The never ending RPS is a rapist threads are something that should've ended much earlier given that decision.

    [–]2RedPill4LYF 0 points1 point  (6 children)

    sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

    I'll meet you halfway. You obviously wasn't interested in banning me so much as threatening me with it when I refused to engage you in your horseshit. I'd had about all I could take of the accusation-laden questions I could handle without throwing my hands up by the time you joined in to have your turn.

    but we won't apologize for getting rid of people who make it difficult for everyone.

    I think you mean you won't apologize for kicking anyone who doesn't agree with your views.

    [–]alphabetmod 0 points1 point  (31 children)

    sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

    one of the mods always had to butt in and started in with loaded and leading questions that made it sound like I was Hitler, so I started calling them out for being trolls. Didn't take long for them to get into private pissing contests with me. Eventually one of them got too frustrated and pulled the ban trigger,

    Bullshit. Which mod?

    [–]suscitare 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

    That never happened to me even though I use a very firm hand with those blue-pillers and feminists. Take it as a complement; getting banned is a victory.

    [–]Endorsed ContributorpuaSenator 9 points10 points  (2 children)

    sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

    I occasionally try purple pill debate, but always walk away frustrated. They remind me a lot like creationists who construct a straw man and attack a completely different philosophy. Creationists often argue against a form of evolution which is faulty, because they intentionally created a new faulty theory to attack. Meanwhile they don't actually understand real evolution. That's TBP. Many of them are honestly convinced we just spend all day teaching each other to rape.

    So now, the only time I argue with them is for self mental masturbation rather than actually try to change their view. The reality is, nothing I can say will change them. They are simply incapable of it. They are generally fat and unattractive hoes who's world view has been shaped as a fat unattractive hoe. The idea that the world is entirely different for social and attractive people is a foreign concept to them. And by trying to open up and understand the realities of the other side would mean they'd have to admit to themselves and confront the fact that they socially have the short end of the stick of what life has to offer.

    By refusing TRP as a reality, they are effectively able to deny that that aspect of life exists. They never have to admit that guys are constantly trying to manipulate women for sex, one way or another, and the reason they don't see it first hand has nothing to do with the fact that they are fat and ugly. Their ego is never going to let them admit they are a bunch of fucking losers, which is why arguing with them is moot.

    [–][deleted]  (1 child)

    sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

    [deleted]

      [–]Endorsed ContributorpuaSenator 2 points3 points  (0 children)

      sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

      Uggg... Exactly. They spend all their fucking time here arguing because they need this to be wrong. You know what I disagree with? SRS... I think they are a gaggle of fuckwits. You know what I don't do? Obsess and debate with them. It's fucking useless. I don't understand why TBP on the other hand is so obsessed with us, unless of course they have an ego to defend.

      [–]2asd1100 0 points1 point  (10 children)

      sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

      ...aka woman logic

      [–]Endorsed ContributorRedBigMan 13 points14 points  (9 children)

      sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

      We should call it pussy logic...

      aka. I have a pussy therefore I'm right.

      [–]Endorsed Contributoraaron_the_just 9 points10 points  (3 children)

      sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

      The fun starts when you get two pussy-bearers to have a fight. Usually, one of them will accuse the other of betraying womankind.

      [–]a-memorable-fancy 11 points12 points  (2 children)

      sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

      Hardly. Rather they turn into exactly the sort of judgmental harpy bitches that they claim ruin their oh so progressive social justice movement. You will never meet a more misogynistic person than a feminist mad at another woman.

      [–]IsThisNameValid 5 points6 points  (1 child)

      sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

      You will never meet a more misogynistic person than a feminist mad at another woman.

      Quote of the day right there.

      [–]Endorsed Contributoraaron_the_just 3 points4 points  (0 children)

      sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

      I watched #solidarityisforwhitewomen with great joy.

      [–]2RedPill4LYF 0 points1 point  (4 children)

      sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

      Who would have thunk women do most of their thinking with their vaginas.

      [–]Endorsed ContributorRedBigMan 5 points6 points  (3 children)

      sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

      Well to be fair most guys do all their thinking with their dicks.

      [–]2RedPill4LYF 2 points3 points  (2 children)

      sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

      True but it could also be argued it's blue pill men who fall victim to their own carnal instincts. I think a big part of being a red piller is being in control of yourself in spite of your natural sexual attraction to the opposite sex.

      [–]Endorsed ContributorRedBigMan 8 points9 points  (1 child)

      sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

      Yep when your brain has veto power over your balls you've become a man.

      [–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

      Favorite thing I've read all day. Thanks for that.

      [–]Sinborn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

      this website is probably a good read: http://cryptome.org/2012/07/gent-forum-spies.htm

      [–]Dark triad expert: - http://illimitablemen.com/ - [3 Points]IllimitableMan 35 points36 points  (23 children)

      sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

      If a woman has something worth saying she can do so without talking about being a woman, any truth to what she says will be self evident

      EG: /u/veggie_girl

      [–][deleted]  (13 children)

      sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

      [deleted]

        [–]Endorsed ContributorRedBigMan 4 points5 points  (10 children)

        sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

        Yeah... I think it was a matter of picking her username before getting heavily involved in TRP.

        That said the fact that she's one of the few (only? not sure if any RPW ladies are also endorsed over here) female(s) with an endorsed contributor tag says plenty on her capabilities to you know provide insight into the female stuff and relate it to stuff that will help guys out (as opposed to the general female crap of "Just be yourself!" sort of advice).

        [–]Lady_Motido 1 point2 points  (9 children)

        sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

        I didn't know you had an endorsed woman on the sub. I haven't seen her on RPW in the 5 months I've been there so it makes me wonder why. I might just find a way to ask her myself but I'm interested in hearing what you think first. Some women can't stand talking to other women and I wondered if that might be the case here. I understand that it can be completely draining at times trying to communicate with a woman let alone an entire sub full of them.

        I often wonder what you endorsed men here at TRP think of RPW in general. It doesn't seem like many of the endorsed women from RPW participate on here often either. SoftHarem explained that many men wouldn't mind hearing more from us but that a lot of men here are going through 5 stages of grief so I personally try to respect that by not intruding too often.

        We value logic, reason, accuracy and practical application of our ideas above all else. If a woman has something worth saying she can do so without talking about being a woman

        This is why I enjoy reading and for the most part just keeping my mouth shut here. I'm still in the learning stage and thank TRP for helping me understand men better, my husband and sons especially and myself too for that matter!

        One more thing, are you guys saying that a woman would have a better time posting here if her nick didn't have any reference to her gender?

        [–]Endorsed ContributorRedBigMan 1 point2 points  (1 child)

        sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

        I often wonder what you endorsed men here at TRP think of RPW in general.

        I actually think RPW is a very great place for women to discuss TRP in a kinder gentler tone that is more suitable for female digestion. Without the regular intrusion of men in the sub it enables women to discuss how to be more feminine and focus on winning the long game by securing a strong male for a LTR or Marriage. The thing is that unlike men who can be self made. Women tend to need more guidance and support. Behind every red pill woman is a red pill man or other red pill women (like fathers, grandmothers and the like). That is why RPW is very important for young women. Those women who do not have strong support structures RPW is a godsent. Much like how TRP really helps guys who dont have good role models. I think with a combination of TRP and RPW undoing the damage feminism has done to our society can be achieved.

        Personally I think it'd be nice if RPW/TRP had some sort of thing where people endorsed on one TRP-related sub end up having it propagated to all TRP-related subs. Thus we could see RPW Endorsed Contributors show their endorsed status when posting on here for example. (PS: I think the color scheme over there is pretty nice for the female dominated sub and the tags you use for endorsed would look good for RPW posting in here for example).

        This is why I enjoy reading and for the most part just keeping my mouth shut here. I'm still in the learning stage and thank TRP for helping me understand men better, my husband and sons especially and myself too for that matter!

        We're all here to learn. Some people learn by memory. Some learn by doing. Some learn by teaching. I think I'm more of the latter myself. I get the most benefit when helping out others.

        One more thing, are you guys saying that a woman would have a better time posting here if her nick didn't have any reference to her gender?

        I think gender references in names is actually helpful to an extent. In many cases it highlights which opinions may need more scrutiny. For example when a woman posts on TRP or when a guy posts in RPW. It may or may not be the best advice but it comes from another redpill point of view.

        [–]Lady_Motido 0 points1 point  (0 children)

        sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

        Personally I think it'd be nice if RPW/TRP had some sort of thing where people endorsed on one TRP-related sub end up having it propagated to all TRP-related subs. Thus we could see RPW Endorsed Contributors show their endorsed status when posting on here for example.

        That really would be nice.

        I get the most benefit when helping out others.

        Same here.

        I'm glad that RPW is viewed that way. I have come across some controversial opinions concerning RPW but for the most part I think it's mostly viewed similarly to the way you do. Thank you for your reply, it was helpful.

        [–]EVILEMU 0 points1 point  (4 children)

        sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

        are you guys saying that a woman would have a better time posting here if her nick didn't have any reference to her gender?

        Based on blind sexism from people that aren't reading what you have to say i'm sure your opinion would matter more to them, but that doesn't matter. It's about what you say, not who are you. This is why we don't like girls trying to gain credit or attention solely based on their sex. ex: "I'm a women and you're wrong because I personally don't display those characteristics."

        [–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (1 child)

        sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

        [–]Dark triad expert: - http://illimitablemen.com/ - [3 Points]IllimitableMan 1 point2 points  (1 child)

        sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

        Someone saying shes probably a 500lb land whale, which is just bigoted and irrelevant.

        [–]2 Mredpillschool[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

        sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

        And false.

        [–]IDefyAxioms 1 point2 points  (0 children)

        sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

        I honestly didn't know she's a girl. I don't really delve into post history and names are fairly meaningless on reddit.

        She's a great example of how being a woman doesn't have to be some qualifier of a viewpoint and that ideas and positions can be accurately detailed without that attention bullshit. She's always super articulate in her posts and intelligent as well.

        [–]wishIcared 0 points1 point  (2 children)

        sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

        The irony. .

        [–]Dark triad expert: - http://illimitablemen.com/ - [3 Points]IllimitableMan 0 points1 point  (1 child)

        sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

        Yeah she has girl in her name, but she doesn't go on about being a woman and how that affects her viewpoint. Always found her a pleasure to deal with. Didn't get endorsed for nothing. On an off note in all that propaganda that we're evil misogynists, they forget to note we have at least one female endorsed contributor. Haha.

        [–]gnoon1200 49 points50 points  (42 children)

        sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

        I honestly don't understand how someone cannot think the lock analogy is brilliant. I've been using it for years

        [–]Endorsed ContributorRedBigMan 25 points26 points  (0 children)

        sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

        Because when confronted with the raw unfiltered truth... Hamsters gotta hamst.

        [–]brave_sir_fapsalot 1 point2 points  (0 children)

        sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

        It's such a perfectly apt analogy that the truth behind it feels inherent and incontestable. This is alarming for people who hear it but aren't able to accept it.

        [–]AlsdousHuxley 0 points1 point  (16 children)

        sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

        I just dont understand why for the lock analogy a vagina and lock are paralleled, the whole purpose of a lock is to stay closed unless the right key is introduced, why are you trying to encourage selective sex? Is there any issue with promiscuous women? Just inherent to the concept, is a women having lots of sex worse than a man doing the same? With the approach to picking up women viewed as men "getting into the pants" of the girl that seems like a flaw with the system not the participants, a.k.a the problem men have to be the ones doing the work to get the women to consent, not that women are consenting too frequently

        Edit: Although, the fish analogy is logical and can applied to many things other than just picking up women.

        [–]2 Mredpillschool[S] 25 points26 points  (15 children)

        sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

        Women are the selective gender, which means it's easy for women to get sex, and very difficult for men. When a man says he's got skill with the ladies, it's impressive because we know it's not easy to do. When a woman says she can get laid, it's not impressive because we already know that. Most of us think well duh, you can get sex, heck I'd bone you right now if you have a condom..

        [–]AlsdousHuxley -1 points0 points  (13 children)

        sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

        Maybe to hop back a bit, where is the idea of them being the consenting gender? I get socially that we have to be the ones to make them desire to have sex with us, biologically we would and do have to prove to be an adequate mate, Im just wondering where this all stems from. What innately makes them have this power? It just seems to be the way it is. Maybe because our desire for sex is greater, or at least more over powering, so they understand it as a power issue?

        [–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (4 children)

        sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

        I'm a bit sleep deprived, so maybe someone else can clarify, but I'll try to tackle this problem.

        Lets lay down some groundwork, excuse me if some of this is obvious

        In nature, the crude goal of life is to reproduce ad. infinitum. With the case of genetic life, it's to reproduce those genes. This isn't a conscious decision, it either does, or it dies.

        The point of sexual reproduction is to mix up genes a little so they don't become redundant and go extinct. (Genetic diversity). But from this diversity and from mutations, at any point in time, you will have creatures that are more likely to survive and reproduce in their environment, and those less likely.

        Hence, one of the primary goals of humans, in general, is to reproduce and carry our genes into the future. Either directly, by fucking, or if we can't, indirectly, by supporting our tribe and helping our close genetic neighbors fuck.

        In order to assure this fact, we want to maximize our genetic potential and mate with the strongest genes available, and do it as many times as possible. We also want the same of our children and grandchildren.

        Ok, now ill get closer to the point. Men and women have a inherently different amount of opportunity to reproduce. Women get pregnant, and have a bit of a rebound period after they give birth, before they can get pregnant again. Also, quite a high amount of chance of miscarriage and complications, as well as infant mortality, especially before modern medicine. As well as being able to get pregnant only a limited number of times in their life. Even in ideal conditions.

        Men on the other hand, under ideal conditions, have the potential to impregnate many women per day, every day, for the majority of their life. And there's very little risk to doing so.

        Hence, women have to be extremely careful in who they choose as a mate because they have a small amount of tries to get it right. if they choose wrong, they can can either die in childbirth, or pass on shitty genes to their offspring, who might not be able to survive or reproduce in their future environment.

        Men on the other hand, in order to propagate their genes, have to try to get as many women pregnant as possible. And because all men are trying to do this, and have the potential to constantly do this, it creates a whole lot of competition.

        So we have a lot of men trying to give sex away as frequently as possible to whomever they can, and a small amount of women who are healthy enough to get pregnant who aren't pregnant already.

        And so from this diversity, reproductive time-frame, and competition, it is in the woman's best interest to chose the one man, out of the sea of sperm, who will give her genetically strong kids, and to have a man provide for, and nurture the kids until they are old enough to fend for himself.

        Now, our biology and our sexual culture has changed very since the time before birth control and now, and all of these feelings associated with sex still hold. They are instinctual, much more than they are intellectual.

        To give a common example, these are the same instinctual feelings as when you find rotten food or poop disgusting, not because you learned that these things should be disgusting (although certainly you did as well), but because of the potential for these things to fuck you up beyond repair. And even though you intellectually know that these things can't really hurt you from afar, you are still repulsed by them because of instincts. Having poor sexual strategy is in the same way seen as disgusting, because it has a potential to fuck up your genetic line beyond repair, even though intellectually, there's little wrong with it.

        So a woman who will have sex with any dude that flings himself at her is seen as repulsive, because this the worst sexual strategy a woman could have. Hence, a lock that opens to any key.

        And a man who is able to convince a large number of women around him that he is the top genetic candidate out of the sea of men is seen as as noble and praiseworthy. Hence, a key that can open any lock.

        P.S. Holy fuck, I did not expect to wright that much, it's 4AM, i need sleep.

        [–]1Zackcid 0 points1 point  (0 children)

        sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

        Well said, the concept of "Hypergamy" should become much more obvious to those struggling with it after reading this. Between the lines, we can see why it is females that are branded with "Hypergamous" and not males. It also explains why a woman could be vibing with you one evening and everything seems almost perfect. An alpha man suddenly walks in and Voosh! all her attraction vanishes and goes to this new, "superior" man.

        [–]2 Mredpillschool[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

        sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

        Thanks, this is basically it.

        [–]AlsdousHuxley 0 points1 point  (0 children)

        sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

        The long and short of it is that: since women are limited in how many times they can birth, they want to be most efficient/effective in terms of times reproduced vs quality of kids.

        By the way, very interesting reply, certainly worth considering, thanks for taking the time to write this all

        [–]SenorPuff 0 points1 point  (7 children)

        sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

        It has to do with the necessity of the society. For the survival of the species, women have to bear children and raise them up to a certain point. Men have to provide for the woman during that period. A weak woman doesn't create problems, because the Y chromosome that is passed to any future male offspring (and thus future providers/warriors/protectors) comes from the male. Weak women don't cause any problems because they already are the weak gender. Weak men pass on genes to their male offspring that lead to future weakness.

        It's the alpha fux side of things.

        [–][deleted]  (3 children)

        sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

        [deleted]

          [–]SmokeU 11 points12 points  (2 children)

          sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

          Sounds like an invasion of female or immature minds.

          [–]jolly--roger 1 point2 points  (1 child)

          sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

          yeah well, another askreddit thread where trp is on par with morbidreality, watching people die etc etc etc..

          [–]∞ Red Pill VisionaryRollo-Tomassi 15 points16 points  (1 child)

          sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

          Nothing belies the complete lack of a valid counterargument than deliberately interpreting your debate opponent's analogies, metaphors and illustrations in as literal a sense as possible.

          In other words, it's squid ink.

          [–]rporion 3 points4 points  (0 children)

          sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

          No, I dont think that is true.

          I think such people do not try to make a point, or even be "right", I think they try to win.

          By "winning" I mean winning on a social level, if they can ostracize you, or shame you into silence, or lower your social status enough that noone wants to be associated with you or your ideas they have "won" on the only field of battle that matters to them.

          I also think that they are giving away what they fear most by using this as their go to tactic almost instinctively.

          [–]RPstudent 13 points14 points  (10 children)

          sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

          I've grown weary with the nitpicking over phrasing. In the house party writeup I saw enough examples of people harping on the use of swallowing in the title. Have we societally slipped our grasp on logic and deduction that we can't get the reference to the red pill?

          It echoes the point you're making on the deconstruction of analogies. In these instances it's willful disregard for the author's (commenter's) intent when deploying the analogy or reference. And for those who enjoy playing gotcha games to score cheap debate team points, the red pill is not for you

          [–]2 Mredpillschool[S] 13 points14 points  (7 children)

          sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

          I saw that thread, and deleted it.

          [–]RPstudent 1 point2 points  (6 children)

          sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

          I saw you removed the "field report" from the troll yesterday, but my reference was to the presently top rated post. No worries either way, just there's been an uptick in sniping about the way people make their points rather than addressing the point made on its merits.

          [–]dr_bloodmoney 2 points3 points  (0 children)

          sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

          You have just described most of reddit. It's infuriating.

          [–]pheonixignition 1 point2 points  (0 children)

          sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

          Yeah, that post was distracting from the point. "Don't use swallowing." Wtf?

          [–]batfish55 19 points20 points  (5 children)

          sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

          If you think I'm literally talking about trees right now, the red pill is not for you.

          That actually made me laugh out loud.

          ....but I'm forced to agree. It bothers me that, here, where men discuss logical, rational plans of attack in living life, there are plenty of people commenting who don't know the difference between "your" and "you're".

          [–]1Krackor -3 points-2 points  (4 children)

          sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

          Even worse are the people who spend time dwelling on mundane grammar or spelling mistakes instead of absorbing the point of the message.

          [–]totorox 2 points3 points  (2 children)

          sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

          But I'm triggered by your/you're and there/their confusions.

          I actually am. It's kind of an experiment each time I fall upon one.

          Should I let this slip ? Should I flame the fucker? Should I skip reading the rest of his comment altogether?

          And if I do read it, it's with this idea in the back of my mind :

          So let's see, is there anything in there to disprove the working-theory that anyone dumb enough to make that red flag of a confusion will waste my time if I keep reading him?

          Rarely fails. So yeah, keep confusing "you're" and "your" you retards out there, saves me time from reading your comments... and depth of attention when I do read them.

          [–]VelociReactor 0 points1 point  (1 child)

          sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

          I absolutely agree. When someone is absent minded enough to make the mistake of mixing up you're/your, you have to question their intelligence and I tend to value their opinion much less.

          It's not that hard people.

          [–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

          sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

          It's not even absent mindedness, but lack of attention to detail/ lack of giving a shit. Everyone makes typos, but if someone doesn't spend the few seconds it takes to read over what they just furiously typed, I can't be bothered to care about what they wrote.

          [–]Endorsed Contributoraaron_the_just 13 points14 points  (1 child)

          sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

          rps, thanks for kicking it up a notch lately. far fewer shit comments the last two days.

          [–]2 Mredpillschool[S] 19 points20 points  (0 children)

          sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

          Don't thank just me-

          /u/pillpaxton

          /u/bsutansalt

          /u/SoftHarem

          /u/redpill_factory

          /u/MachiavellianRed

          Are all here shouldering the load.

          [–]Endorsed ContributorRedBigMan 11 points12 points  (5 children)

          sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

          If you can't find the goddamned forest because you're too busy looking at trees, the red pill is not for you. If you think I'm literally talking about trees right now, the red pill is not for you.

          LOL way to drive the point home. That line just made me laugh.

          Further, I can't believe I have to explain this, but we don't actually want tit pics, these will be deleted and banned.

          Did people really pick TITS over GTFO after all that shit in their face about TITS choice just being a filter for being a whore? I guess we got a whole lot of shameless whores around here... or some dudes just copy and pasting tits from their porn folder. Either way great job on pruning the stuff out.

          [–]2 Mredpillschool[S] 17 points18 points  (4 children)

          sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

          Haha, well we weren't getting any actual tit pics- but for some reason the younger members were replying "that's stupid bro, requiring tit pics is just begging for pussy.."

          Their actual takeaway was that I wanted to expand my porn collection. Needless to say our banlist grew three sizes that day.

          [–]IDefyAxioms 0 points1 point  (1 child)

          sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

          I'm really curious now, just how big is this illustrious list?

          Thanks to you and all the other mods as well for doing your best in keeping this place top-notch. You're all doing a great job.

          [–]2 Mredpillschool[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

          sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

          Pages and pages. I don't have an official count any more, but it's in the thousands.

          [–]assinmygenes 0 points1 point  (1 child)

          sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

          I think it's safe to say that a fair amount of poorly educated men have been attracted to trp thinking it's their free ticket to pussy. Then when a Nietzsche post comes up their eyes glaze over.

          [–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

          sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

          That's what /r/seduction is for. We have bigger fish to fry around here.

          [–]FortunateBum 10 points11 points  (1 child)

          sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

          It's an analog, not a proof! You cannot just make up nonsense analogies to try to disprove an analogy because they aren't proofs themselves, they're descriptors.

          Oh God, almost every fucking discussion I ever had with anyone in college. What a waste.

          [–]2 Mredpillschool[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

          sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

          Some baseballs are round, bats are hard, but a good baseball gets hit by a bat.. therefore you're wrong!

          WTF

          [–][deleted] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

          sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

          It's clear that female presence tends to temper discussion and modify the message.

          I'm glad you are able to recognize this and willing to act on it. Few are.

          [–]flocosix 7 points8 points  (0 children)

          sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

          I didn't like this subreddit at first but it's stuff like this that's keeping me here - I can freshen up on some reasonable, sane, no-bullshit discussions, get a dose of straight-up truth with complete disregard for political correctness and other shit no one should care about. Thank you for being the way you are.

          [–]Atlas_Above 11 points12 points  (13 children)

          sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

          I'd also like to point out all the didn't happen posts in the field report from last night. I got downvoted to hell and back for saying shit like that is stupid.

          It is stupid. How truthful the post was has literally no bearing on its validity and shouldn't be bothered with. Believability is a non issue. Not everything that goes through this sub will be true. Its just how people are and its especially true with this influx of new people. Take what you can from what is provided, and don't look a gift horse in the mouth. If there is RP strats or game in a post, learn from it. This is a subreddit about dealing with women and how to act like a man, not some bitchfest calling shit from the sidelines.

          [–]2 Mredpillschool[S] 4 points5 points  (4 children)

          sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

          Agreed. Mind you, random downvotes of good material has been normal here since day 1.

          [–]MockingDead 0 points1 point  (3 children)

          sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

          Isn't that the Reddit vote fuzzer? Or is that a rumor?

          [–]2 Mredpillschool[S] 6 points7 points  (2 children)

          sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

          The fuzzer is +/- maybe 5% - 10%. But we also get brigaded a lot. For a good portion of our history, we just didn't have downvote buttons. So the downvoting problem isn't new.

          [–]RojoEscarlata 6 points7 points  (1 child)

          sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

          The karma system is good on paper. Upvote to give visibility to comments that dd to the discussion.

          Sadly this is not the case, the system is more like a "I upvote what agrees with my personal view, and downvote what doesn't"

          Also low quality comments that have a quick emotional response, Like making you laugh.

          A few days ago there was a thread in seddit full of good advice (Including my mind you) and all where shadowed by a top comment(and the following circlejerk) in the triple digits making a play on words on the tittle of the OP or something.

          That's why I like 4chan format so much, the flow of the threads there is much better for an open discussion.

          [–]the_Milkweed 6 points7 points  (0 children)

          sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

          I couldn't agree more, no one takes shit from anyone on 4chan and if you can't take the heat you are just told to fuck off. Reddit is an amazing example of how 'sheeple' rule the world through passive aggression.

          [–][deleted]  (7 children)

          sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

          [deleted]

            [–]Atlas_Above 1 point2 points  (6 children)

            sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

            I clearly stated I was piggybacking on his comment to talk about something else. I don't see where I'm at fault here.

            [–][deleted]  (5 children)

            sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

            [deleted]

              [–]Atlas_Above 0 points1 point  (4 children)

              sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

              Not trying to come off as aggressive. Just meant I'm not sure why they didn't understand that I was referencing something else.

              [–]RojoEscarlata 1 point2 points  (1 child)

              sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

              Why not quoting the exact post you wanted to reference?

              [–]Atlas_Above 0 points1 point  (0 children)

              sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

              Fair point.

              [–]RojoEscarlata 4 points5 points  (13 children)

              sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

              This post reminded me the sticky they have in the header of /pol/

              http://i.4cdn.org/pol/src/1378753471679.jpg

              EDIT: Forgot to add the site too

              https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/

              Very helpful actually.

              [–]MockingDead 5 points6 points  (11 children)

              sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

              My favorite is the Fallacy Fallacy. Decided to get into an argument with a fembeast and she kept talking about exploitation, and then accusing my of moving goal posts when I discussed free will.

              Using the loaded word exploitation necessitates a discussion on free will.

              [–]pheonixignition -1 points0 points  (10 children)

              sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

              I would like to point out the fallacy fallacy relates to saying because a point that was poorly worded or argumented means its wrong.

              Moreover, I'm really curious why you consider the word "exploitative" necessitates free will. Quite frankly, exploitation does not relate to free will. Don't give me some "they can leave/do x if they want to" bullshit, either. That's a false premise.

              [–]MockingDead 5 points6 points  (8 children)

              sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

              So which fallacy is used when you claim a fallacy where none exists?

              Exploitation implies that they are forced into an action. It's an illusion. We always have options, even ones we find unsatisfactory. Having advantage over someone because they are unwilling to choose other options is not exploitation. Specifically, offering someone a job when they need money is not exploitation. They may always refuse.

              It's not a false premise. We always have options, and every choice has consequences. The only thing free will allows is for you to understand and accept the consequences you wish to take.

              [–]RojoEscarlata 1 point2 points  (0 children)

              sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

              Agreed, people are using the word exploitation too much lately, and lets be honest unless you are a modern slave like in Africa or the sweatshops in China free will is still present.

              But people tend to think that they are "exploited" because all the options given to them aren't what they want.

              Free will is a burden that many, many people just can't handle.

              [–]RojoEscarlata 0 points1 point  (0 children)

              sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

              I would like to point out the fallacy fallacy relates to saying because a point that was poorly worded or argumented means its wrong.

              Exactly, a poorly presented argument, or an argument presented with a false premise doesn't make it invalid.

              Like the example in under Fallacy Fallacy.

              Recognising that Amanda had committed a fallacy in arguing that we should eat healthy food because a nutritionist said it was popular, Alyse said we should therefore eat bacon double cheeseburgers every day.

              Amanda is obviously an idiot because of her reasons to eat healthy, but her point is still right, and Alyse is a bigger idiot for dismissing and idea and committed another Fallacy in the process. Amanda is wrong on her assumption on why we should eat healthy, therefore healthy food is wrong/bad.

              And this creates a vicious circle of pure BS.

              The table is not only to point people who fall under this fallacies, but to prevent you to falling in one too.

              [–]SgtBrutalisk 5 points6 points  (4 children)

              sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

              Can we please make it a sidebar rule, something to the effect of: "Any comment starting with 'I am a woman therefore...' will be deleted promptly".

              I am tired of all the Argumentum ad Feminem.

              [–]2 Mredpillschool[S] 4 points5 points  (1 child)

              sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

              It's already an unofficial rule that the mods enforce.

              [–]Human_v2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

              sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

              Make it an official rule so to discourage people from doing it. Might mean you have to do less enforcing and people will see exactly why it's being enforced when you have to.

              [–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (1 child)

              sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

              There are no girls on the internet.

              [–]Patriarchal_Bondage 5 points6 points  (2 children)

              sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

              To substitute the quote from this excellent piece of Reg D Hunter standup:

              "Yeah well it sounded like you were [calling women fish]."

              "It seemed like that, but I'm not. And the reason is, instead of you listening to me with your hearing and your intellect. You were listening to me with your feelings.

              [–]RojoEscarlata 0 points1 point  (0 children)

              sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

              Wow this guy is pretty good.

              I'll check more of him at night.

              Thanks for sharing.

              [–]2 Mredpillschool[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

              sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

              That's awesome. Thanks for sharing.

              [–][deleted] 7 points8 points  (1 child)

              sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

              I initially gave TRP a pass due to my own prejudices, but thanks to my recovery I'm in this mode where I pretend I woke up in this body/mind and treat myself like a black box. I am carefully dismantling my own conditioning that's been holding me back not just with women but in life. It took a whiny /r/seduction post to bring me to here and shine some light on what you've already summed up so well.

              I spent a few hours yesterday googling what the world thought of TRP because I wanted perspective and debate. And what I found were the most cherry-picked "extreme" examples to fit their firmly-entrenched narratives. Even the supposedly canned essays became a line drawn through the wrong data points. I find myself wanting to discredit them due to their motivations but I'd be just as faulty.

              Certainly a post like OP's will barely make it as a footnote in the next great anti-TRP blog. The key-lock analogy, the fish analogy, these are easy targets for people unable (or worse, unwilling) to see the analogy for what it truly is. After I traipsed through enough of the criticism I asked myself with which side of the argument is better for me to be aligned. I'm unconcerned if it won't sway detractors I've spent enough time toeing their line up to this point.

              The Tits or GTFO post was the line in the sand and I'm with you on it.

              [–]totorox 3 points4 points  (0 children)

              sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

              The Tits or GTFO post was the line in the sand and I'm with you on it.

              I agree it's a flag. A red flag to some, a blue one to others.

              It's a great line in the sand indeed : You're against the tits or gtfo rule? You're welcome out.

              [–][deleted] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

              sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

              Thanks man. Keep swinging the banhammer, so we can keep our little paradise clean from all these idiots out there.

              [–]SenorPuff 3 points4 points  (0 children)

              sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

              Every analogy breaks down at a point, because it is intended to be representative, not be exact, by definition. Poking holes in an analogy doesn't remove the logic behind the comparison, necessarily. Good luck having a feminist understand that, though.

              [–]still_very_alive 3 points4 points  (8 children)

              sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

              /r/TheBluePill needs to take a serious look at this post. In my experience a great deal of what they do is just being deliberately ignorant.

              [–]2 Mredpillschool[S] 12 points13 points  (0 children)

              sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

              That would require insight.

              [–]Endorsed ContributorRedBigMan 15 points16 points  (6 children)

              sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

              You sound like you believe /r/TheBluePill is meant to be a serious and honest attempt to counteract our message as opposed to just a bunch of SRS idiots circlejerking and satirizing our shit because they cant come up with an original thought with the collective braincell they all share.

              [–]2 Mredpillschool[S] 12 points13 points  (0 children)

              sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

              Don't forget, they are absolutely obsessed with us. I think it's less a satire, and more of an homage.

              [–]RojoEscarlata 2 points3 points  (3 children)

              sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

              Ugh!

              What a fucking horrible sub.

              Just out if curiosity I visited there, saw this thread

              Since the Red Pill wont shut up about Orwell

              https://31.media.tumblr.com/9f7be1085ab74e948b48241feb2e9b7d/tumblr_n2yfcboROh1r87yi7o1_500.png

              I clic the thread expecting a counter argument of the ideas presented by Orwell are or not RP, and instead I just see a silly image, circle jerck comments and no one compelling argument.

              What a piece of shit sub.

              [–]A_Seabear 0 points1 point  (0 children)

              sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

              If you look at all of their top submissions all time it is full of shit like that. If you look at our top submissions of all time we have a few posts of schadenfreude, but most of our heavily upvoted posts contain some real talk

              [–]Endorsed ContributorRedBigMan 0 points1 point  (1 child)

              sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

              Well you know they are from SRS and the operative word in the abbreviation being SHIT.

              [–]still_very_alive 1 point2 points  (0 children)

              sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

              The regulars, sure. For me, I actually first came to TBP, lurked there a while, then decided to actually check out TRP. It was then I realised just how full of shit they were.

              [–]19 Endorsed Contributordrrrrrr 4 points5 points  (0 children)

              sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

              The problem is that people believe the argument is won as soon as you prove that TRP is socially awkward or TRP is misogynistic or TRP is evil. People for a variety of reasons find it impossible to grasp that the argument is won when you prove TRP wrong (or right). TRP makes no claims to be moral, socially accepted, or non-sexist. This is why arguments with stupid people will never work - they try to prove that you are wrong by societal wisdom, you are trying to argue that you are right based on what actually works. No ground can be gained - you both will just pat yourselves on the back and think you are right, because you both ARE.

              The other thing is... people need to learn what a generalization means. If I say most women like dominant men for example, bringing up 1 or even 10 women you know who like wimpy guys contributes nothing at all to the argument. I don't know what it is about reddit and generalizations - generalizations simply work. More often than not, they are right, so in conversation, we should be able to drop ideas like "women prefer commitment, men prefer sex" without having some giant battle because I'm "over-generalizing".

              If I tell you there's two stocks, one that has a 80% chance of doubling in the next year and one that has a 20% chance of doubling in the next year, which would you choose? Ok - now if 80% of women like muscular guys and 20% of women like skinny jean hipster stick-figures, can we just accept that there is an overall trend going on here, and to better your chances you will put on some damn muscle? People spend their careers studying trends and generalizations, which they use to make massive amounts of money for all kinds of companies. Yet you arguing on askbetas about what women like, you are too morally lofty to use generalizations and trends to get your dick wet?

              [–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

              sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

              We value logic, reason, accuracy and practical application of our ideas above all else. If a woman has something worth saying she can do so without talking about being a woman, any truth to what she says will be self evident.

              Tits or GTFO is a great post to weed out people who need to lurk and not comment, or not lurk. Also, like was said, this place is on reddit but not on reddit, so all the faggotries of "As a fisherman" or "as a cosplay girl" aren't needed due to the fact that we're working against talking being more important than what' said here.

              How cringe to see the betas/knights flock to upvote and reply to all the "as a girl" posts.

              [–]rokr1292 1 point2 points  (1 child)

              sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

              The fish analogy always reminds me of Patrice O'Neal. Rest in peace brother.

              [–]totorox 0 points1 point  (0 children)

              sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

              and the reference will remain unknown to those not in the know...

              [–]1myTRPaccount 1 point2 points  (0 children)

              sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

              And yet, for some reason, here I am explaining yesterday's Tits or GTFO post. I banned more people yesterday than every day last week combined.

              I get why this is done to our particular sub, however, I have seen those 4chan explanations posted to other place on Reddit and get a lot of agreement from the popuilation. The point is valid and accepted as true elsewhere on Reddit to the point I have seem variations bestof'd. Anyone who was arguing against it is trolling.

              On alt accounts, I've posted to askwomen and twox and never mentioned my gender. It's easy to get people to agree with you so long as you make valid points. Announcing your gender in gendered subs usually detracts from the conversation and is most often irrelevant to the discussion.

              [–]CrashTheMachine 1 point2 points  (0 children)

              sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

              I like trees.

              [–]Jswiizle 2 points3 points  (31 children)

              sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

              Okay... I agree with most of the laws of TRP, but I find the lock analogy too far... I think men and woman should be judged equally on their promiscuity.

              [–]MagicGainbow 1 point2 points  (0 children)

              sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

              ''I think men and woman should be judged equally on their promiscuity.'' Wishful thinking that will never fly, women use other women as an indicator of a man's fitness, a virgin 21 yr old women is highly sought after, a virgin 21 yr old man is avoided like the plague, so yeah good luck with that.

              [–]16 Endorsed ContributorCyralea 5 points6 points  (8 children)

              sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

              That belies reality in that one gender is naturally selective. Women are the selective sex -- you agree with this much, right? A woman can obtain sex anytime she wants, obtaining it is not a feat at all (i.e. shitty lock).

              Men, conversely, have more difficulty obtaining sex. Some men are fantastic at it (i.e. good keys) but on the whole it is much harder for the average male to obtain sex than the average female.

              Such a dynamic is intrinsic given our biology.

              [–]Jswiizle -1 points0 points  (5 children)

              sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

              I think it is true to a certain degree, but is that instinctual? It may be a little, but in my opinion it is mostly due to societal conditioning. I am selective to who i have sex with, yes I do get shunned from the girls friends if i say no. I would only fuck like 8% of my school...

              [–]16 Endorsed ContributorCyralea 4 points5 points  (4 children)

              sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

              The biological explanation for it is that women were forced to be selective to ensure they had the best genetics passed on, as pregnancy and childbirth were risky and resource-intensive. Being impregnated by a weaker male meant your offspring didn't likely make it to the next round of genetic cycling.

              The corollary is that for men is that spreading seed is low on resources. Impregnating as many women as possible is the surest way to pass on your genetics. There would be no drawback in such a scenario for a man.

              This is the basis for why men will generally sleep with most women (and men, in the case of homosexuals) and most women will not do the same with men.

              [–]dexmonic -1 points0 points  (1 child)

              sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

              Wow, this is a lime of thinking I have never seen before, and it makes a lot of sense to me. What you say a seems to be true. However, I can't fully agree until I see the intelligent counter claims to this type of thinking. Any respectable reading you would recommend that goes against what you are saying?

              [–]rakenodiax 0 points1 point  (0 children)

              sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

              Judging by your crazy person wall of text filled with misspellings and poor grammar (without a denial of my main point: that you reek of TRP [and hey, I hear you like parenthesis]), you probably are as most in this thread suspect. Not to mention commenting in TRP about how they've "won" (such a catch) you over. Have fun with the self-loathing and loneliness, bub.

              [–]2 Mredpillschool[S] 1 point2 points  (3 children)

              sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

              I think men and woman should be judged equally on their promiscuity.

              [–]Jswiizle 0 points1 point  (2 children)

              sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

              Yeah, but that contradicts your analogy

              [–]totorox -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

              sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

              A woman proves her value by saying no : by being selective. Because all she needs to do to get dick is go outside and say yes. Because female sexuality is high value whereas male sexuality is worthless. Because the females are the limiting factor in reproduction.

              The analogy calls the lock a shitty lock. Of course the notion of judgment hangs around that, but beyond judgment and the social moral rules that sustain it there is the biological gender differences that justify these social moral rules.

              So the point of the analogy is like TRP, it's not to lay blame or shame it's to describe reality as it is... in a society infected by lies about it.

              Female promiscuity can be shamed or not but that's not the point. The point is that it destroys said promiscuous females' ability to be a wives and mothers in the long term.

              So TRP places itself outside of the moral debate as this moral debate is hijacked by feminists on one side and right wing tryhards on the other, with the success of feminism that we have seen in the past decades.

              Beyond shame and judgment there is the hardcore life reality of promiscuous women. Their children pay the price, if they have any.

              Shoulda kept those legs shut. Sorry you haven't been taught well but it's no motive for us to consent to you teaching your daughters to be even worse without us speaking up against your lies.

              [–]16 Endorsed ContributorCyralea 1 point2 points  (5 children)

              sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

              I used to believe that it was the case that the misrepresentations were deliberate, but as I got older it's become clear to me that most people have trouble with logic. At least at a higher level. If I had to estimate, some 80% of people are fully incapable of coming to logical conclusions without a very active effort.

              If I can add, the other common trait in such a person is that they can't understand generalizations. Most people don't understand that an exception doesn't invalidate a rule ("Chinese people are shorter than average" isn't invalidated by the existence of Yao Ming). In their minds I think they lack the tools to see the connections that allow probabilistic thinking.

              [–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

              sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

              I'm going through this right now. Hanging on one word...... And misinterpreting it to cause an emotional fight.

              [–]1kick6 0 points1 point  (0 children)

              sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

              Agreed, but you're preaching to the choir.

              [–]toysjoe 0 points1 point  (1 child)

              sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

              In the brackets it should be "versus" not "verses".

              [–]2 Mredpillschool[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

              sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

              thx

              [–][deleted]  (3 children)

              sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

              [deleted]

                [–]2 Mredpillschool[S] 3 points4 points  (2 children)

                sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

                Don't stoop to their level and call them autistic.

                [–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (1 child)

                sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

                Yeah, that doesn't insult the idiots, it only insults the actual autistics.

                [–]MagicGainbow 0 points1 point  (0 children)

                sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

                Yeah, I have aspergers syndrome and find the whole thing offensive to an extent , most sperglords are not autistic, they are just uptight, I would say due to my own effort and with help from trp that I have come along way, recently it helped me bag a girl who looks strikingly similar to this actress http://media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/8c/b1/ea/8cb1ea609135c7bbe3547db68d314e20.jpg, so thanks trp!

                [–]CallMeMrBadGuy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

                sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

                It's an intentional misunderstanding and intentional aloofness to the meat of TRP. This is especially by radfems. They specialize in ignoring logic and specialize in trying to bring the discourse into outrage and/or snark. It's really of no consequence however because the realities of the actual situation and there lack of a substantive counterargument or manner of action to RP theory means that for the people that stuff off their betaness and put RP concepts in action and see it work, will need no further convincing.

                So I say continue speaking in generalities and analogies that are clearly evident to anyone but the trolls who choose to intentionally be brainless and worry less about their need for explicit wording. They're so intelligent they cant read between the lines

                [–]wishIcared 0 points1 point  (0 children)

                sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

                Having to censor is bullshit, just ban em all, the red pill is clearly not for everyone.

                [–]Rainymood_XI 0 points1 point  (2 children)

                sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

                Further, I see no real value in field reports from women, because we shouldn't trust what they say (versus what they do).

                Ouch

                [–]wishIcared 3 points4 points  (1 child)

                sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

                Its very true though. Women lie all the time, constantly and to themselves.

                [–]totorox 0 points1 point  (0 children)

                sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

                Yup. Self-delusion seems to be necessary to receptivity and passivity, like self clarity seems necessary to activity and emissivity.

                I'm mysterious because I attract and I attract because I'm mysterious

                I'm so mysterious I can spend all day listening to interpretations about me and my relationships

                Not all women are fixated into the passive, receptive, self-deluded mode but the ones who aren't dont get caught by the attentionwhores net that is the tits or gtfo rule.

                [–]totorox 0 points1 point  (1 child)

                sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

                Excellent. I hope this policy will remain enforced.

                I'm glad I came over here after 4chan got censored.

                [–]modernneo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

                sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

                Prime example. People take RP ideas and terminology completely out of context without even bothering to find out what is actually being said, and then downvote and mock the one guy who tries to clarify. They then go off on an idiotic tangent that is apparently meant to mock this subreddit but just ends up making them look like pathetic trolls.

                [–]BluepillProfessor 0 points1 point  (0 children)

                sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

                As a Christian man I feel this is reasonable.

                [–]Deansdale 0 points1 point  (0 children)

                sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

                Pure gold, thank you.