all 168 comments

[–]Lipophobicity 72 points73 points  (5 children)

Using this author's own logic either:

a) North American women really are that bad

b) It's just her

I find both options equally plausible and hilarious

[–]Ojisan1 25 points26 points  (0 children)

Wouldn't there also be an option c) All men are pigs.

That's how they seem to want to explain their own failings.

[–]Andress1 16 points17 points  (2 children)

c)Asian culture is weird and abnormal. Thats what she thinks,and in her own words "mediocre/nerdy" guys exploit a "loophole" and thats why they get so many girls.

[–]through_a_ways 9 points10 points  (1 child)

guys exploit a "loophole" and thats why they get so many girls.

What would that loophole be? Collective abstinence from women to decrease their value?

[–]Andress1 7 points8 points  (0 children)

The old "advantage of them because they live in a poor country" thing or taking advantage because there isnt feminist there and they cant date the guy they really want and say "no" to guys like the ones she despises from having success.

[–]garlicextract 6 points7 points  (0 children)

lol that's great, didn't even realize that

[–]TankVet 192 points193 points  (8 children)

This woman's words are just mind-bogglingly sexist, pompous and self-righteous.

She uses her own values to harshly judge another culture, but is morally outraged when that culture does the same to her based on their values.

She believes herself to be so far above other women that she is outraged when they are chosen over her. She's like the white knight neckbeard who believes he deserves a supermodel girlfriend to approach him in the depths of his parents' basement. She's just as detached from reality.

Her self-righteousness is grotesque. How dare these lesser mortals not value her as she does? They're scum! They should be calling to her as she passes them in the streets! (Wait, I think I saw that video...)

Man or woman, there's no maturity, morality or value in disrespect or pomposity. This person may be college educated (for what little that's worth), but she has the emotional maturity of a grade schooler.

[–][deleted]  (6 children)

[deleted]

    [–]omg_cats 8 points9 points  (4 children)

    I beg to differ, sir.

    conceited

    Perhaps not about their looks, but believing the delusion that they're here on earth to save women is pure conceit.

    entitled

    and as we know, white knights feel entitled to intimacy, attention, and sex that they 'earned' by playing the protector role.

    White knighting is the worst kind of egotism because it completely removes agency from the woman and makes the white knight the center of the universe.

    [–]Ignatius_Oh_Reilly 2 points3 points  (0 children)

    I am no fan of white knights, but at least it's I have to do something to earn love, affection...

    Women seem to think mere existing means the deserve to be wanted.

    [–]through_a_ways 6 points7 points  (0 children)

    and as we know, white knights feel entitled to intimacy, attention, and sex that they 'earned' by playing the protector role.

    I'm not sure. Being a white knight would mean that you were against feeling entitled to sex, because that's "rape culture" or w/e.

    At the same time, many white knights do feel entitled to sex.

    I think there are 2 different types of white knights, the conscious kind (which consciously pays heed to feminism) and the unconscious kind (which does it out of a natural male instinct for loving/caring/protecting, and has a sense of entitlement for sex in return).

    [–]mormon-nigger 1 point2 points  (0 children)

    most white knight neckbeards are never that conceited or entitled

    Ehh I think that maybe...no

    For example, did you read that former reddit employee's AMA. Where reddit CEO said he was fired for not doing his work.

    The neckbeard employee felt entitled to pay without having to do anything and then went and whined about it on reddit. While this is 1 isolated example, many neckbeards fit that profile

    [–]1thrownaway_MGTOW 3 points4 points  (0 children)

    This woman's words are just mind-bogglingly sexist, pompous and self-righteous.

    She provides the Q.E.D for her opponents' arguments.

    [–]lloopy 66 points67 points  (7 children)

    Men are seeking women who will make good partners.

    Women are seeking men who will make good partners.

    The attributes of a good man are not the same as an attribute of a good woman.

    A tall guy with ripped abs and no job isn't going to put food on the table and keep you safe. While it might be a fun ride, it's not what you go home to. Many foreign women are looking for someone they can have children with, someone they can count on. An American man with the means to make it to their country is therefore a catch. He clearly has his life together enough to travel the world!

    A hot American woman might be fun to have sex with, but is going to be a nightmare at home. "I speak two languages, and have traveled the world! Entertain me man-slave! dance! dance!"

    I see women at the gym who have ripped arms and I can honestly say it does absolutely nothing for me. Those are male characteristics, not female characteristics. As one person stated somewhere else, "You can't negotiate desire".

    [–]2 Endorsed ContributorFLFTW16 8 points9 points  (0 children)

    traveled the world

    A woman who has traveled the world has taken many many cocks.

    [–]mormon-nigger 23 points24 points  (5 children)

    I see women at the gym who have ripped arms and I can honestly say it does absolutely nothing for me

    yeah, well you know.. that's just like... your opinion, man

    But seriously... I think I've met less than 5 caucasian "American" women who speak more than 1 language. In my entire life

    [–]SecretAgentQ 17 points18 points  (3 children)

    And when you finally meet a Caucasian American woman who "speaks" more than one language, she sees it as an accomplishment. That's another sign of their living on easy mode: when bilingualism isn't a necessity for survival.

    [–]DoobieEx 5 points6 points  (2 children)

    I only speak english. English is the language of business, most everyone in developed countries speaks it with some degree of passing fluency. Speaking another language, although cool..not really a necessity if you don't travel much outside the U.S.

    [–]Sirinon 2 points3 points  (1 child)

    English and mandarin are required for global business, Knowing spanish helps too.

    Source: Bilingual business guy.

    [–]Hank711 2 points3 points  (0 children)

    Maybe for sales or something. Finance is dominated by English speaking jurisdictions (NYC, London, Hong Kong). I'm not sure any other field else is international enough to really require a foreign language. Not that some specific jobs don't require it.

    [–]omglazers 2 points3 points  (0 children)

    Random chiming in here, if a woman has developed her arms it probably means its because her squat ass can't get any better. Hard bodies are wonderful. I can only talk from personal experience but those girls can can be extremely feminine and submissive sexually and you shouldn't ever count them out.

    [–]UEMcGill 85 points86 points  (9 children)

    You know I read both articles. It seems both men and women fail to realize that not getting a LTR or even a casual relationship falls solely on one person, themselves. We can talk about game, holding frame, or whatever, in the end its about numbers. Even a hapless beta that hangs around enough post wall women may find one that says "Oh alright, might as well".

    I'm in sales. Not used cars, but the kind where the CFO and I sit down and talk about cash flow for the next year. What I've learned is its not about product, but solutions. What problems am I going to fix.

    She thought they had a problem with the product or the features. When really she should have been "What problem can I fix?"

    That's why red pill works. You're not offering a product aka Beta Bux, your offering a solution, alpha Fucks.

    [–]sir_wankalot_here 19 points20 points  (2 children)

    I'm in sales. Not used cars, but the kind where the CFO and I sit down and talk about cash flow for the next year. What I've learned is its not about product, but solutions. What problems am I going to fix.

    In that scenario both you and the CFO are willing to work out a solution. Just saying.

    [–]anttyk47 1 point2 points  (1 child)

    Big boy terms for big boy credibility

    [–]sir_wankalot_here 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    The guy is in sales, he needs to use fancy words. Either way his premise is sound.

    [–]1WishIHadMyOldUsernam 43 points44 points  (1 child)

    That's why red pill works.

    It works also because you're taking ownership of the problem rather than just bitching about it and waiting for someone else to fix it for you. I've tried that approach, just as every other man in here has, and it does fuck all. Taking charge of the situation and actually doing something is the only tried and true way of getting what you want out of life.

    [–]Upvote Me!trpbot[M] 25 points26 points  (0 children)

    You cannot award OP a point because you are not an Endorsed Contributor or your point score is below 5.

    [This is an Automated Message]

    [–]haterandhypocrite 9 points10 points  (1 child)

    Few things are more masculine than motivated, self-sufficient, proactive problem solving. It's very rare to find women with that instinct or ability. Which is why women are rarely engineers or techs. They just aren't that good at thinking in the right way.

    [–]ColTreize 5 points6 points  (0 children)

    That's true. The girls in my engineering classes were far easier to converse and work with and were far more decisive than the liberal arts majors.

    [–]slimcoat 51 points52 points  (7 children)

    One of the worst comments was written by Laura, a self-proclaimed feminist:

    The thing I find most disturbing in these comments is the implicit notion of ownership. Judging from what a lot of these guys have written, a Western female (and maybe any female) is measured in terms of her attractiveness, subservience and datability---in short, "what good are you to me?"

    Extreme double standard. Although she hasn't said it -- yet -- the implication is that she can measure men in terms of attractiveness and dateability (and perhaps subservience, too), but when the tables are turned it's classified as "the implicit notion of ownership".

    Take the SF dress example. That's totally me in Converse and jeans. I dress that way cause it's comfortable. The objective in my getting dressed every morning isn't to attract men.

    Then don't expect to attract men... ever.

    I dress for my lifestyle, for me. Is that what these commentors mean by "self-centered"?---that I live my life for me, in a way that makes me happy?

    Yes. That's exactly what that means.

    That just strikes me as really really sad. I wouldn't be interested in a guy that came at me that way, and wouldn't expect a guy whose interactions with the opposite sex were framed entirely in that context to be remotely attracted to me.

    I wonder if she would want a man to "live for himself" and dress sloppily before he tries to hit on her? More than likely she would label him "creepy" and outright dismiss him before going home to blog about how all these weirdos keep hitting on her.

    But the thing that really bums me out about this whole discussion is this focus on outside validation: having vs. not having a mate, attracting vs. not attracting the opposite sex. When I say that I'm living my life for me, I mean that I want to be the source of my own happiness, not constantly searching for this acceptance and approval from men to measure my self-worth.

    Probably the only point she has that's somewhat close to reality. Yeah, sure, you shouldn't be dependent on somebody else for your own happiness. But love/sex can be a huge part of happiness -- especially when it's nowhere to be found in your life. Ultimately, she's telling people to NOT to seek it. I wonder if this is because she hasn't been successful in the past (evidently due to her own behavior, which she cannot possibly fathom).

    And I don't think that's just me being a feminist...

    I think that has everything to do with it.

    I hear that kind of desperate searching in the male commentors even louder than in the female ones. We're all okay, guys. We're perfectly okay just the way we are, and we really don't need either women vying for our affection or men lavishing attention on us to feel worthy or whole. We are worthy, just the way we are. (I'm apparently a hippie too.)

    Worthy of what? When you're satisfied with your own mediocrity, expecting others to also be satisfied with it is the very definition of entitlement.

    Her hamstering and self-validation would be quite humorous if she weren't trying so hard to drag decent women down with her. It's the same old message that feminism has been preaching all these years... women can sit back and relax, then decry victimization when women are held to standards. It's a horrible spiral that leaves otherwise normal women absolutely helpless and alone, and I can't help but feel a pity for those caught in this shrike's snare of "self-worth" capitulation.

    EDIT: Some clarification.

    [–]through_a_ways 20 points21 points  (1 child)

    But the thing that really bums me out about this whole discussion is this focus on outside validation: having vs. not having a mate, attracting vs. not attracting the opposite sex. When I say that I'm living my life for me, I mean that I want to be the source of my own happiness, not constantly searching for this acceptance and approval from men to measure my self-worth.

    >claims to want to be her "own source of happiness"

    >bitches about not being desired enough by men

    https://33.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m81wv93oAs1rb1dw9o1_500.gif

    [–]possumsquirrel 7 points8 points  (0 children)

    This deserves more acknowledgement, very insightful and thorough observations and analysis.

    [–]ItsYourHandInMine 3 points4 points  (0 children)

    This whole worth, snowflake bullshit is so ingrained in American women. That's why you don't see fat acceptance in other countries, hell in Asia fat shaming keeps the population thin.

    [–]ChaosDesigned 4 points5 points  (0 children)

    I wonder if she would want a man to "live for himself" and dress sloppily before he tries to hit on her? More than likely she would label him "creepy" and outright dismiss him before going home to blog about how all these weirdos keep hitting on her.

    This point so much. I've always hated the way that some females will blatantly do this, and act like they've done nothing wrong. The difference between wanted and unwanted sexual advances are purely physical/perceived status. If a rich guy who's totaly an amazing catch hits on you wearing the clothes of a homeless man, he's a creep. But if a douchey broke bro hits on you wearing a nice suit, it's attractive. But if you speak to a woman who is dressed nicely, you're antagonizing her, if you ignore a woman who is dressed poorly you're a nerd. LMao

    [–]neveragoodtime 2 points3 points  (1 child)

    Great analysis.

    Yes. That's exactly what that means.

    It makes me wonder what she thinks the definition of self centered is. Also, about love, happiness, and dependency that she just doesn't get: If your happiness comes from being loved, you see love as a dependency. If your happiness comes from giving love, you are still the source of your happiness. I think this is a distinction many feminists miss, and they jettison love as a form of patriarchal dependency. Instead of the view of most non-self-centered people who gain happiness from loving, serving, and giving to another person.

    I wouldn't be interested in a guy that came at me that way

    No, she probably wouldn't be interested in a beta that's devoted to her. But a guy would definitely like those qualities in his girl. Differences between what men and women find attractive is a tough pill for feminists to swallow.

    [–]slimcoat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    If your happiness comes from giving love, you are still the source of your happiness. I think this is a distinction many feminists miss, and they jettison love as a form of patriarchal dependency.

    Couldn't have said it better myself. Women think they are hopeless romantics but are so far removed from the very definition of love that they blame their inability to understand it on men/patriarchy. Excellent point.

    [–]16 Endorsed ContributorTRPsubmitter 24 points25 points  (19 children)

    Generally speaking, American women make the worst WIVES, but are known for being great for CASUAL UNATTACHED SEX

    At least in Asia, this is how lots of guys view NA girls. To be fair, most NA girls gladly participate in this arrangement. They're here to just "study and party" here for a few months or year. No one is getting married.

    So it adds to their reputation as "easy girls". Lots of white girls in Korea complain that korean guys view them as easy lays. The fact is they ARE. The problem comes in when NA girls also expect the bf treatment after they spread their legs. Normal non-slutty Korean girls will have sex with you, but MOST want to be girlfriended before that happens. Even if it's just 1 or 2 dates and you tell them "I want to date you".

    In other words, the price of sex is still "higher" in Asia because women here know its value. There will always be a segment of Asian slutty girls, but the majority make guys work a bit harder for it, which is why guys are willing to invest more into girls here.

    [–]robot-b 6 points7 points  (9 children)

    Even if it's just 1 or 2 dates and you tell them "I want to date you".

    I actually really liked how kind of regimented it was. See a girl, make out with her, maybe a date or two. On the third or so, take her to the nearest love hotel afterwards. Nice relaxing shower, then the inevitable

    Her:'Are we going out?'

    'Why, you like me baby?'

    'Yes'

    'OK sure, now dry off and get in bed'

    cue sex with a busty 19yr old. she also made me a massive tray of tarts, was delicious

    [–]feelinglazy 0 points1 point  (8 children)

    Busty asian? Which part of asia are you living in?

    [–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (6 children)

    Contrary to popular belief there are plenty of asian chicks with tits, the average is smaller but tits are still plentiful.

    Last gf was 18 with J cups and not a fatty. Have had plenty of other big breasted ladies too.

    [–]feelinglazy 0 points1 point  (5 children)

    Dude, I live in Asia. Most asian girls don't have tits.

    Where are you living?

    [–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (4 children)

    Tokyo.

    Plenty of tits out here. Although I really dont give a shit if they got no tits as I'm all about dat ass and hairy puss.

    [–]feelinglazy 0 points1 point  (3 children)

    They don't even have ass where I live. It's just flat from head to toe.

    [–]theredman89 0 points1 point  (2 children)

    Where are you? I'm in Vietnam and the girls here have bigger asses than I'd anticipated. As the commenter above said, the average is smaller but I wouldn't call seeing a girl with large either/both uncommon. Plus the majority are all in relatively great shape when compared to their Western counterparts.

    [–]feelinglazy 0 points1 point  (1 child)

    Are you in the south? I'm in the north and although women here are fit, they just don't have a lot of sex appeal.

    [–]theredman89 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    Yeah, I'm in Ho Chi Minh. Hanoi girls not so good?

    [–]robot-b 4 points5 points  (0 children)

    this was Japan. the girl also dressed down so I didn't even notice the tits (was winter). when she got her clothes off in the hotel, i was like dayummmmm

    [–]through_a_ways 8 points9 points  (7 children)

    Asians are the most K selected, west Africans are the most r selected, Caucasians are in between.

    [–]FullRedvolution 2 points3 points  (6 children)

    In the Western world it seems white girls are going full R selection.

    [–]EasyChief 1 point2 points  (5 children)

    Wait, what does K and R selected mean?

    [–]Revo_Luzione 8 points9 points  (0 children)

    Terms from biology that indicate the level of parental investment in offspring. Humans, elephants, and cetaceans (dolphins/whales) have the highest--they invest years of parenting in offspring. This is K selection, high parental investment.

    Insects have the lowest--many species die off before offspring are born. This is R selection, low parental investment. Comparisons can be made interspecies and intraspecies. Different races of humans, different breeds of dogs, or populations of dolphins can be more or less r or K than another. There's a book floating around by the Anonymous Conservative that applies this theory to politics. It's interesting stuff.

    Edited for clarity & spelling.

    [–]FullRedvolution 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bu6ouKt9zhs

    Great 7 minute video on the topic.

    [–]thisjibberjabber 0 points1 point  (2 children)

    what does K and R selected mean?

    I had to look it up. Seems to be a superseded theory, and applying it to races of humans seems a bit suspect.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R/K_selection_theory#Status

    [–]through_a_ways -1 points0 points  (0 children)

    r/K selection theory is also useful in studying the evolution of ecological and life history differences between subspecies such as African honey bee, A. m. scutellata, and the Italian bee, A. m. ligustica.[1]

    Keyword, "subspecies". Not sure how far off human race is from bee subspecies, but the difference probably isn't gargantuan.

    [–]boxofcookies101 1 point2 points  (0 children)

    To comment on this from personal experience. They definitely will make you work for that first lay.

    And in contrast though if they do spread the cheeks early. They usually understand that it's not a gf-bf arrangement. They don't want any of that. It's more of a fling kind of arrangement on the DL. It's very nice for a few months abroad.

    [–]1FrogTrainer 16 points17 points  (0 children)

    cue the typical male shaming in the comments, and complete rejection of introspection by all female commentators.

    [–]b00m_shakalaka 16 points17 points  (1 child)

    i. Blow criticism all out of proportion

    "What, we seem more narcissistic and entitled than women from other places, on average? OMFG why are you comparing us to rampaging Godzillas and toxic chemicals?! So uncalled for!"

    ii. Compare yourself to this giant caricature you've created

    "Well, I'm obviously not as bad as they're saying (that is, your over-dramatization of what they're saying), so their criticisms seem unfounded. I think it's safe to write them off as bitter neckbeards.

    iii. Write it off, keep believing you're perfect, fail to learn/grow/improve, keep wondering why you're not getting what you want.

    [–]OsoFeo 11 points12 points  (0 children)

    Actually, what shocked me about this piece was that she is almost as bad as the giant caricature that she has created from the criticism she completely ignores.

    [–][deleted] 16 points17 points  (0 children)

    She doesn't even justify or try to defend American (Western) women. Just hamsters that it's hard to find a "life partner" if your rule out American women. When there's the entire continents of Asia and Europe try harder fatty. (not that non-Western women are angels or anything, far from it, still a hella of a lot better).

    [–]19 Endorsed Contributordrrrrrr 14 points15 points  (4 children)

    Good too see some commenters getting it. "Here in Brazil we say American women are good for sex and bad for love."

    If the betas in the US/CA/UK/AU would just stop pedestalizing their trash, then maybe our women would have to actually improve, lose weight, get off antidepressants, shitty diets, drugs, and feminism. Unfortunately as long as feminist countries have squadrons of Captain-SAHs, then our women will never change. It takes extreme circumstances and a lack of a beta validation stimulus for women to even contemplate self-improvement, let alone stick to it.

    [–]Yoda7 18 points19 points  (3 children)

    The cause of the American female is....the American male. As soon as these pussies grow some balls, stop thinking with their dicks for five minutes, and get with the plan, then this stuff will get sorted out. When these repulsive/ repugnant women cant ever get a bf, men stop getting married, and quit feeding the machine, it will come to an end. Women have been cornering the market for 30 years while men sat back fat and dumb. Just look at the average male redditors view of RP.

    [–]19 Endorsed Contributordrrrrrr 1 point2 points  (1 child)

    Yup. American men created one of, if not the best societies to life in of all time, and they threw it all away because they got lazy, weak-minded, easily distracted with BP bullshit, and filled up with delusions of white-knighting. American boys get their minds murked before they get a chance to grow up and only a small % of them remain as men were naturally meant to be. When we trash women, who are we really trashing? The people who let women become this way.

    [–]Yoda7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    It's going to be a long road, if it's even possible to turn this around.

    [–]16 Endorsed ContributorCyralea 14 points15 points  (1 child)

    I'm glad that she included Canada, Toronto is the capital of self-absorbed feminist cunts. This is the only place where "Do you know how to cook" is equally offensive to "Why are you so goddamn fat, bitch?" I'll throw out Australia as well, I hear they're in the same boat.

    I'll give the author credit though, she isn't outright hamstering away the phenomenon. She recognizes the plausibility of it. You can't help but laugh at how she wants to weasel a way out for herself though.

    [–]Zeff_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    What surprises me is how proud they are of being unable to cook. I personally think it's a life skill everyone needs

    [–][deleted] 12 points13 points  (10 children)

    Yeah, I had a friend who is attracted to the stereotypical Caucasian alpha male type.

    Too bad for her, because she's a muscular, aggressive, bitchy black girl. Trying to tell her (numerous times) "the things that work for me (being a muscular, aggressive, uncompromising black male) don't work for you" was just a waste of effort.

    She was convinced that she just had to try harder.

    [–]TekkomanKingz 19 points20 points  (6 children)

    Fellow brother here. Our women are hopeless. There is a movement going on where Sisters are going after Men of other races in droves. The sad reality is nobody wants them, mostly due to stereotypes reinforced by their own behaviors.

    Now if you go to Africa, Caribbean or Latin America then all Men are attracted to Sisters. The problem here is nationality and our dysfunctional culture, not our race.

    [–][deleted] 10 points11 points  (5 children)

    Fellow brother here. Our women are hopeless.

    It's a strange beast of their own making. They spend so much time trying to emasculate us that they don't see that they are the problem.

    I'm often criticized about my choices in sexual partners and I have to often hold the mirror at them and ask "would YOU want to commit to that?" (the hamster takes over at that point)

    Why would any man of worth willingly affix himself to a group of people who outright despise his intelligence, stymie his efforts at social mobility, mock his effort to improve, and belittle his masculinity?

    No fucking thanks, bring on the Indian women.

    There is a movement going on where Sisters are going after Men of other races in droves.

    Let them. Here in America, the one or two that do find a man willing to tolerate them end up with men that are so far down the SMV ladder that they get my pity.

    The sad reality is nobody wants them, mostly due to stereotypes reinforced by their own behaviors.

    And the hamster will tell them that the problem isn't them - it's all the "weak men" that can't handle them.

    Now if you go to Africa, Caribbean or Latin America then all Men are attracted to Sisters.

    Because they know how to fucking act with a man of value and they're accustomed to black men having value and not being a fetish or "something you do in Vegas when nobody is watching".

    The problem here is nationality and our dysfunctional culture, not our race.

    American black women are just a waste of time.

    [–]Yoda7 10 points11 points  (1 child)

    Anytime I see a woman use the term "real man" thats my cue to cut ties and exit left. Never seen it fail yet.

    [–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

    "Real ManTM " = someone who will celebrate my insatiable cock hopping sexual independence and be there to pay all my bills support me emotionally.

    Actually, a "Real ManTM " is whatever makes them feel good about being grossly inadequate.

    [–]DoobieEx 8 points9 points  (0 children)

    White women who habitually date black men are almost the worst. They ape a fucked up behavior pattern they weren't even raised around because they got giny tingle watching BET. A decent black man is generally unnatracted to this shit, and they end up with some broke ass wanna-be hustler. Even worse, I watch women I grew up with doing this, mothering, supporting these useless fucks half the time and complaining about their horse shit the other half.

    As far as black women, honestly I find them easier than white women. As rascist as it probably sounds as a self employed white man with decent clothes, house of my own, and a decent education it is far easier for me to project status. They respond to a much more aggressive, straight forward (albeit lacking in finesse) game style.

    [–]ChaosDesigned 6 points7 points  (0 children)

    Another brotha checking in.

    Why would any man of worth willingly affix himself to a group of people who outright despise his intelligence, stymie his efforts at social mobility, mock his effort to improve, and belittle his masculinity?

    THIS SO MUCH! Having grown up around "Strong black women" my entire life, hearing them complain about their selection of men, when they are the problems. Who else is gunna let you shit talk them all day and night? Get in their face, harass them, belittle them, and insult your intelligence?

    I have always strayed away from dating Black women, not because I can't handle them but because you bottleneck yourself into a horrible cultural standpoint of praising ignorance and hypocritical public belittling. If you want a nigga that treats you right, stop shopping in the trash, looking for a thug nigga.

    [–]randomchaos1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    Funny, I feel this way about western women in general. Eastern European here.

    [–]through_a_ways 5 points6 points  (2 children)

    It seems like the entire history of black Americans was just an experiment in feminism. (Hint: it didn't work)

    Blacks used to be identical to whites in indicators of social dysfunction (divorce, bastard children, unemployment, etc.), but that changed when welfare was introduced.

    Welfare is essentially feminism. It gives the woman more power, and thus takes power away from males.

    I think desegregation probably put a dent in black Americans as well, since it necessitates putting a bunch of people who are automatically "low status" into a pool of people who are automatically "high status". Basically, lots of social dysfunction, and less wealth concentrated within their own race, since all the top, already established competitors were white. Desegregation is like abolishing the women's league in sports, but worse, since wealth is built up over time, while athletics mostly stay the same.

    I think you can hear the degeneration in black (and to a lesser extent white) music as well. From ragtime/jazz to rock, eventually to hip hop, and to the gangster rap shit that exists today. For whites, replace ragtime/jazz with classical, and replace gangster rap with talentless mainstream pop/rock.

    It also seems like blacks (and whites) have progressively liked bigger and bigger butts throughout the years. The girls in Sir-mix-a-lot's video are a far cry from J-lo, who herself is a far cry from the gluteally gifted (or sometimes enhanced) girls we see today. Big butts are just a trait that I some associate with "r selection", they just instinctively look "fertile", and it seems like guys don't start liking them until they complete puberty (I personally never saw the appeal at all until I was out of my teens)

    [–][deleted]  (1 child)

    [deleted]

      [–]through_a_ways -1 points0 points  (0 children)

      Leftists are a scourge on every nation. We should throw rocks at them.

      [–]oceanlifetime 11 points12 points  (0 children)

      I'm one of those guys who has lived or worked in different countries and dated women there (France, Eastern Europe, China, and a few others). I suppose according to detractors, I just can't get a big beautiful American girl to like me. The reality is that having experienced women from other countries I'm just not interested in dating American women anymore. If I were into plates I'd consider an American, but not for LTR.

      [–]1Watermelon_Salesman 9 points10 points  (33 children)

      I'm not american and I haven't been to the USA since 1993. Are things really that bad?

      I always thought of your country as a vast, diverse continent, with each state having its own culture. I thought that there was a very relevant difference between Vermont and Texas, states with quite distant cultures, although part of the same country. I always thought that going from Oregon to Louisiana was like going from London to Maghreb.

      Are american women really like that in every american state?

      [–]OsoFeo 22 points23 points  (17 children)

      No, but where women aren't typically land-whales (the South) they are overly-entitled cunts (NYC).

      I'm speaking in broad generalities here: cases presented on TRP are generally biased towards the worse examples of human behavior, and there are lovely women and excellent men everywhere. But North American culture is profoundly entitled, and the entitltement does incentivize women to be either fat or mean (or both).

      [–]Anderfail 12 points13 points  (15 children)

      The South has basically two extremes and almost nothing in between: land-whales and gorgeous Southern Belles so while there is a high concentration of obesity, there is also a high concentration of good looking people.

      For comparison, I was just in Boston this past summer and noticed a few major differences from Houston. The people were generally in better shape in the sense that I noticed very few overweight people, but almost no one seemed to care about their actual appearance (everyone usually had on sloppy clothes, very few dresses, no heels, and general terrible style for men all around). In Houston, there was a lot of obese people but among those who were not obese, the sense of style, fashion, and willingness to dress nice was vastly greater. That is the women in South take great pains to looks feminine both in and out of the gym. It's a really interesting dichotomy and does show the differences between the two areas.

      [–]1IVIaskerade 6 points7 points  (9 children)

      I visted California a few years ago, and the number of people in San Franciso that were in decent shape compared to those rolling around (pun very much intentional) Vegas was eye-opening.

      Of course, being a cishet white shitlord, there may not be many prospects for me in SF, but still....

      [–]antariusz 6 points7 points  (5 children)

      How dare you compare woman to minerals waiting to be mined, you're virtually raping them with your words.

      Just kidding, treat them like a West Virginia coal mine.

      [–]DoobieEx 1 point2 points  (0 children)

      As a West Virginian I both resent and love your comment.....must...give...upvote.

      [–]1IVIaskerade 0 points1 point  (3 children)

      I think you may have replied to the wrong comment.

      [–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (2 children)

      It's a joke about 'prospects' because prospecting is also the term used when looking for mineable minerals.

      [–]1IVIaskerade 0 points1 point  (1 child)

      Oh. I didn't make the connection. I feel that we may have killed the joke somewhat. Ah well, c'est la vie.

      [–]HahahahaWaitWhat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      At least thank the man for explaining the damn joke to, you git.

      [–]widec 1 point2 points  (2 children)

      Can the climate be part of the reason? San Fran is temperate all year round, you can go out for a jog all year round. Vegas is not like that, half the year it is so scorching that just walking somewhere will make you a sweaty uncomfortable mess. I hear that's a big reason why obesity rates are so high in the south, the heat tends to make people really slow moving and lazy.

      [–]Revo_Luzione 2 points3 points  (0 children)

      Vegas is fat due to all the visiting midwesterners & southerners. Vegas locals are often quite attractive. You don't see them visiting casinos, they work there. Dancers, escorts, bouncers, waitstaff, bartenders, etc.

      There's a thriving fitness culture among vegas locals. Super sick mountain biking & hiking trails close to town, usable 9 months out of the year (not in summer, except for the diehard desert rats.) And yes, lots and lots of superfit gym rats in vegas local culture.

      I had an aunt who lived there for 15 years, I visited often and for extended time periods, got to know some very interesting locals.

      [–]1IVIaskerade -1 points0 points  (0 children)

      Sure, but if there's not one air-conditioned gym place you can work out in Vegas, I'll eat the nearest hat.

      I think it's more likely that SF people tend to be more health-conscious, whereas Vegas is gluttony (and all of the other sins too) and excess given physical form.

      Of course, it could also be that the culture in the South is to get fat and blame the weather.

      [–]1NV0K3R 8 points9 points  (2 children)

      Errr...I don't know what South you are talking about. I live in GA. You either have whales or these "gorgeous" Southern Belles that could be an ad placement for Saphora. Literally, I could frost a cake with all the shit they put on their face.

      [–]himan235 0 points1 point  (1 child)

      These cosmetics are unbelievable much my cousin could share her frosty paint palette face with her friends and shes not hideous but easily influenced dumb young girl where she looks like a clown in a cartoon. Subtle eye shadow and liner can sometimes want to make a grown man cry

      [–]MickeyRoarick 1 point2 points  (1 child)

      Putting a wedding ring on a southern girl is like pulling the ripcord on her inflatable ass.

      [–][deleted] 19 points20 points  (4 children)

      A broad but accurate stereotype is that women fall into one of three categories in America.

      • 65%-fat women with terrible personalities (they think they are "10 out of 10" princesses)
      • 20%-fat women with acceptable personalities
      • 14.99999999%-Attractive women with the most god awful personalities imaginable
      • 0.000000001%-Attractive women with good personalities

      [–][deleted]  (1 child)

      [deleted]

        [–]DoobieEx 0 points1 point  (0 children)

        I mean if we're factoring I mental health and credit report we might as well just all get in the pile.

        Kidding, btw.

        [–]Yoda7 3 points4 points  (1 child)

        And the 1/10000 usually ends up with a douche bag.

        [–]through_a_ways 8 points9 points  (1 child)

        I always thought of your country as a vast, diverse continent, with each state having its own culture.

        Women nationwide all watch the same shitty shows and internet trends, and as a result are pretty interchangeable whether you're in Illinois, NYC, or Seattle.

        The "culture" you're speaking of is mostly political differences. Going from Oregon to Louisiana is like going from a rich part of England to a poor white part of England.

        [–]mrp3anut 5 points6 points  (2 children)

        The cultures are different between states. The likelihood of finding a LTR worthy woman is higher in the south/Midwest but is diminishing due to the media bombardment of socialist and feminist ideals.

        [–]antariusz 3 points4 points  (1 child)

        The "best" women leave the midwest to go slut around in LA, NYC, or Florida for a few years.

        [–]mrp3anut 0 points1 point  (0 children)

        No the shitty ones leave to go slut it up. The ones you want for an LTR/wife stay and volunteer with their church, get nursing or teaching degrees etc

        [–]LadyLumen 1 point2 points  (3 children)

        I've heard that women in America are characteristically more masculine than in other cultures, which sometimes is good and sometimes is bad. There was a British guy on Reddit talking about how he liked to date American women over British women because they had more of a sense of adventure and were more willing to try new things.

        An Irish guy on Reddit said he liked dating American women because they were kind of like one of your bros.

        So maybe some guys like the adventurous, independent girl. But if you're looking for feminine charm, that's not typically something American gals are known for.

        [–]jobs33ker 12 points13 points  (0 children)

        I've heard that women in America are characteristically more masculine than in other cultures, which sometimes is good and sometimes is bad. There was a British guy on Reddit talking about how he liked to date American women over British women because they had more of a sense of adventure and were more willing to try new things.

        An Irish guy on Reddit said he liked dating American women because they were kind of like one of your bros.

        That's all just hamstereze for "They're sluts".

        That or these guys are hopelessly naive.

        [–]ColTreize 2 points3 points  (0 children)

        It was the accents. I've worked with Brits and Aussies and they pull tail like crazy, all on account of the panty dropping accents.

        [–]fiat_lux_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

        That has a lot to do with American cultural worship of meritocracy.

        Don't get me wrong, I love meritocracy. I like that people are judged for their personal accomplishments rather than their birthright, unlike many other places in the world. But it's honest to analyze and criticize even things you support. This overemphasis on "success" and competition as universal measures of self-worth kills charms traditionally associated with feminity.

        Feminists and many other women are corrupted by corporate influence here. They join the rat race and are told to "Be confident!" / "Be assertive!" / "Take charge!" / "Lead!"

        But what does that mean?

        The influences aren't meant to be negative in spirit, but you know how these things go. There are negative spins to this. What is the line between "confidence" and "arrogance"/"stubbornness"? What is the line between "humility" and "insecurity"? (Hell, some people can't even draw clear lines between "insecurity" and "arrogance", two negative traits, as they rationalize one as compensation for another.) These lines are blurred when it comes to actualization of these qualities IRL in the form of actions/behaviours. These are philosophical question that most people don't take the time to truly analyze. (And to be perfectly honest, I haven't gotten it figured out either. I can talk about it all I want here with you online, but in person, when viewing behaviours, it's difficult to describe them with the qualities we're talking about.)

        Outwardly, introspection is indirectly discouraged as it looks like uncertainty and is difficult to distinguish. A lot of people internalize that, and just become obstinate. They dump humility all together while taking corporate lessons to the home, and it is unattractive to most people who are unused to it, but especially to men who don't feel like "competing" with their gfs/wives.

        [–]Frisky-Fox 33 points34 points  (4 children)

        I have done a lot of globe trotting with a family member's flight benefits, and from my personal experiences, I think most of the reason that women in america are so low quality is that they are spoiled by a lot of attractive and successful men.

        When I travel to other countries, I find that most men are in worse shape (I don't mean fat, just not regularly athletic) and most men are poorer and less educated than men are in the United States.

        Women always shoot for the top 25% of guys. In the United States, they have their pick of good looking, successful men. In other countries, most of those men come here, leaving women in those countries hungry for high quality mates. So as a good looking successful american man I work hard to be a player in the US, but I'm banging girls on rooftops in foreign countries. Vice versa for women.

        [–]Sadpanda596 17 points18 points  (0 children)

        Well said. I wish more people would realize dating is literally just economics. There are studies out there that show that the amount a guy will spend on a girl is highly proportional to the supply of women in his city.

        I'd argue that the bigger issue in Japan particularly is that Japanese men are notorious for just not being interested in dating. Thus, you've got a super high supply of women and low supply of men. Of course a woman is gonna have issues. Your example is probably more applicable in eastern european countries.

        [–]DoobieEx 7 points8 points  (0 children)

        I second a lot of this. A slightly overweight U.S. male (think military post seperation weight gain) is a fuck of a lot more athletic than most middle eastern men. I also think our forwardness and general friendly attitude goes a long way.

        [–]mormon-nigger 8 points9 points  (0 children)

        This is spot on. It has been said on here many times. Average looking girls on dating sites get like 20+ messages a day, whereas equally average or i would say "pretty good looking" guys will get maybe 1-2 messages a week on the same sites.

        Go to another country in like Asia or Latin america and a decent/average looking guy is now a hot exotic item. You speak their language? Even more points. Any reasonably attractive guy could generally date up/date hotter girls without much game.

        [–]Snivellious 7 points8 points  (0 children)

        "Fat, evil, and smell like yeast." That line alone justifies the entire conversation to me.

        [–][deleted]  (2 children)

        [deleted]

          [–]Yoda7 2 points3 points  (0 children)

          Its also too difficult to keep a man in the dark for more than a few months. Better to hop around.

          [–]Endorsed ContributorRS73 1 point2 points  (0 children)

          Travel does indeed expand the mind, but these women do it like some guys fuck women, just to get a notch count, and don't form any lasting relationships because they value the new and exciting over building trust and respect.

          Perfectly stated. A lot of these women have a soulless quality that's both dull and somewhat creepy but they're okay with it.

          [–]Dark triad expert: - http://illimitablemen.com/ - [3 Points]IllimitableMan 6 points7 points  (2 children)

          The vile and repulsive state of contemporary western women serves as a huge warning for the rest of the world not to institutionalise the ideology of feminism into their own cultures. Feminism has been, and always will be, cultural suicide. I of course, am referring to the fall of Rome.

          [–]Handiesandcandies 0 points1 point  (1 child)

          Can you expand on the last part, how did the fall of Rome occur because of Feminism?

          [–]brotherjustincrowe 4 points5 points  (0 children)

          "It's misogyny!" They're not complaining about ALL women, darlin'. Just you. "Well those other women have internalized misogyny." Nope, you. "SHUTTUP YOU MISOGYNIST!!" Oh, right, the problem is everyone in the world except you.

          [–]1kick6 5 points6 points  (0 children)

          Here's one of the comments that encapsulates everything that's wrong with western women, and why men who go to foreign countries, and meet foreign women say north american women suck (emphasis mine)

          The thing I find most disturbing in these comments is the implicit notion of ownership. Judging from what a lot of these guys have written, a Western female (and maybe any female) is measured in terms of her attractiveness, subservience and datability---in short, "what good are you to me?" Take the SF dress example. That's totally me in Converse and jeans. I dress that way cause it's comfortable. The objective in my* getting dressed every morning isn't to attract men. I dress for my lifestyle, for me. Is that what these commentors mean by "self-centered"?---that I live my life for me, in a way that makes me happy? That just strikes me as really really sad. I wouldn't be interested in a guy that came at me that way, and wouldn't expect a guy whose interactions with the opposite sex were framed entirely in that context to be remotely attracted to me. But the thing that really bums me out about this whole discussion is this focus on outside validation: having vs. not having a mate, attracting vs. not attracting the opposite sex. When I say that I'm living my life for me, I mean that I want to be the source of my own happiness, not constantly searching for this acceptance and approval from men to measure my self-worth. And I don't think that's just me being a feminist; I hear that kind of desperate searching in the male commentors even louder than in the female ones. We're all okay, guys. We're perfectly okay just the way we are, and we really don't need either women vying for our affection or men lavishing attention on us to feel worthy or whole. We are worthy, just the way we are. (I'm apparently a hippie too.) Thanks for opening up this discussion. Super fascinating stuff.

          Jesus Christ, I couldn't have written this better had I tried. The point is: western men don't realize that American women are narcissistic cunts because it's all they've known. Then they go to foriegn countries and realize "holy shit, these girls actually care a small amount about how they're perceived in the social sphere, and want a relationship with an actual person and not just some fucking checklist...American women suck!"

          [–]2asd1100 4 points5 points  (0 children)

          Never fucked a american chick, but I have "shagged" british chicks and holly shit are they a world away from anything the continent has to offer. Even Dutch feminists or westernised italian chicks are bearable and attractive enough to put up with their bullshit compared to what britain has to offer. It's not the US, it's the lack of any positive feminine models. This is what you get when you erase any positive feminine models and raise women as men, they lack the necessary motivation to be functional human beings.

          [–]DumpyLips 4 points5 points  (0 children)

          What I don't get is the lack of reflection. I feel like anytime anyone has ever tried to tell me something about myself, no matter how little, big, insulting or nice I reflected long and hard about whether there was any truth in it and I always respected the fact that the other person may be able to see something that I can't see myself.

          The comments were just filled with people saying "What is everyone talking about? Thats not true, American women aren't like that!!!" I don't get how that can be a knee jerk response. Wouldn't you ask yourself why the ENTIRE WORLD thinks american women are certain kind a way? Wouldn't you wonder if there was some truth to it that you couldn't see because you were an american women?

          [–]Axis_of_Weasels 9 points10 points  (5 children)

          I seriously doubt European women are much different than American. Its a western thing

          [–]Ojisan1 10 points11 points  (4 children)

          Eastern European and Western European are different mindsets.

          Eastern Europeans grew up under deprivation and Communism (and in some cases, war, such as the Balkans). They have far less sense of entitlement and "hey I'm a woman and everyone should cater to me for that reason alone."

          Western European women I think have a lot in common with American women, although Europeans are generally fitter than Americans.

          [–]USmellFunny 6 points7 points  (3 children)

          I'm from Eastern Europe and I can confirm this post. Everything I read here about Western Women seems like from a horror story. You do have the occasional westernised cunt who displays the type of behaviour I see people complaining about in this sub but all in all, women are pretty RP.

          For example, most women know how to cook and they will be proud of their cooking skills. I have yet to run into a woman who equates knowing how to cook with slavery. They aren't as entitled as their Western counterparts and as a result, we have true social, legal and cultural equality. No government-mandated quotas, no bitching about the patriarchy oppressing women. They haven't even heard of the word "patriarchy" outside of it's scientific use.

          That said, I can see how Western ideas are slowly taking hold of my country and within a generation, these RP women will be extinct.

          [–]Spiderman48 0 points1 point  (2 children)

          Where in eastern Europe are you from?

          [–]spideyx 0 points1 point  (0 children)

          Sounds like somewhere in central Europe or in Ukraine.

          [–]PracticallyAlpha 3 points4 points  (0 children)

          That last quote called her stinky and was sourced "Unchi", or "poop". Well done, Internet.

          [–]kanaduhisfruityeh 3 points4 points  (0 children)

          The problem with North American women is that they think they're special, and North American men think North American women are special- until they go to other countries. Then they realize that North American women aren't the only option.

          [–]MickeyRoarick 3 points4 points  (0 children)

          @ Vin - Yeah, there are some pretty bad dressers here. I think the emphasis on comfort (I.e., the sweatpant and sneaker look) hasn't helped any. But is that really all that big of a deal?

          I find it hard to relate to men and women of ANY culture who haven't traveled much or lived abroad. I hope that doesn't sound snobby...it's just the truth. I guess it's like anything...you're drawn to people with whom you share similar interests.

          What a wonderful author. "I dress like shit and want to be treated like a beautiful independent human being without any mental problems! And oh but sorry I just judge the shit out of anyone who isn't wealthy enough to live and travel around the world. No I'm not only interested in rich guys, just guys who can afford to travel around the world frequently every year that's all. Everyone else is so blegh, like I can't even look at them they disgust me- omg why are people so shallow and judge me walking around wearing sweatpants!!!"

          Another woman chimes in:

          Take the SF dress example. That's totally me in Converse and jeans. I dress that way cause it's comfortable. The objective in my getting dressed every morning isn't to attract men. I dress for my lifestyle, for me. Is that what these commentors mean by "self-centered"?---that I live my life for me, in a way that makes me happy?

          Lol it is kinda selfish and slobby, I could walk around wearing a Borat mankini with my huge gut gathering the melted ice cream dripping off my face, but if that makes me happy then fuck every other person in the world who doesn't like it! Am I selfish?? (But in all honesty, that jeans and converse outfit isn't too bad, plenty of girls I dated in HS dressed like that. I've just moved past that. What's really off putting is her attitude about it.)

          These comments are just endless in entertainment.

          [–]hur1n 10 points11 points  (4 children)

          holy shit, the first comment on the article, by "Ania" -

          Anyone who starts a comment with something like “I have traveled all over the world conducting a multi-billion dollar business" is a sad little loser with no accomplishments who pours out his self-disappointment and bitterness spreading internet hatred

          w...wwhAT? lol.

          a woman is saying that a man who travels and also conducts business on a multi-billion dollar level, is a sad loser with no accomplishments.

          [–]1IVIaskerade 15 points16 points  (1 child)

          No, she's pointing out that starting your post by trying to raise your status in the eyes of others is bad.

          Much as the internet abhors people starting off with "As a woman..." starting off "I am rich/successful/handsome/powerful/a sex god" just comes across as "I am desperately trying to make it look like I know what I'm talking about".

          [–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

          I think she is pointing out that by the wording, it sounds like he is making it up. Nobody talks like that.

          [–]HahahahaWaitWhat 1 point2 points  (0 children)

          You conduct business, not a business.

          [–]scarletspider3 4 points5 points  (0 children)

          I love the under tone of this article. At least one woman was knocked off her pedestal. Now we just have to knock afew more off of their pedestals.

          [–]the99percent1 2 points3 points  (1 child)

          discount 180million NA girls? Bitch please, you are livin in a place that has a billion pussy...

          What the fuck is wrong with this liberal arts educunted sorry excuse of a girl?

          How far up her own self-entitled ass does she have to be?

          [–]1IVIaskerade 0 points1 point  (0 children)

          How far up her own self-entitled ass does she have to be?

          Not as far as I am, if she wants to be given the time of day. Why?

          [–]2NiftyDolphin 2 points3 points  (0 children)

          "Hi! In an article I wrote, I pretty much branded myself as an undatable shrew. My co-workers have now found out about the article, and have read the comments section and are shaming me. I was just KIDDING! It's hard for every-AmericanMenAreJustAsBadOrWorse-body out there, so can't we all get along?"

          [–]1kick6 2 points3 points  (2 children)

          archive.today is blocked at work. Can someone kick me the real link?

          [–]letsgoblues 2 points3 points  (0 children)

          If this is how men abroad view the female population of North America, well then forget sewing a Canadian flag to my backpack, next time I leave the U.S. I’ll wear a fur hat and pretend to be Russian.

          I'm quite familiar with Russian women. She couldn't come close to pulling it off.

          [–]LandShark805 1 point2 points  (0 children)

          I want to have sake with Unchi-kun.

          [–]kamenr 1 point2 points  (0 children)

          Gaijin saying: "I didn't come to Japan to eat roast beef."

          [–]Keats852 1 point2 points  (0 children)

          I'm a European guy, I've been in the USA for 4 years, and to be honest, I'm looking for a European or Asian woman. American girls are just too high-maintenance, show no initiative, and are generally pretty shallow.

          [–]RebootedMale 1 point2 points  (0 children)

          Can you imagine if this girl spent .01% of the time she spends traveling and whining in the gym?

          You create your own problems in life by making bad decisions. Choosing the wrong priorities. Any bias against western women would be eliminated if the woman in question simply got fit and learned the value of humility.

          [–]guy2435 1 point2 points  (3 children)

          I have watched a documentary about why japan's population is on a decline. There was a portion of it where they interviewed a 30 and 38 year old single men, if I remember it correctly, who are very much addicted to video games and PC anime dating games and are not interested in getting married. And the comment below that dating is a lot of work and women expects so much from men etc, summarizes their sentiments. They are much happier playing their games, going to clubs, going to geek conventions, with their friends or on their own. Comment below could be the RP reason for that.

          valhar2000
          September 10, 2014
          Kelly: Don’t worry about the “sudden superiority western men assume”. It’s a scam.

          Japanese men, in record numbers, have done what western men, so far, can only dream of: they have overcome their addiction to pussy. Once that is done, it becomes clear that dating is a lot of work, ludicrously risky, and offers little reward, except for a tiny minority of people who get lucky.

          This is why Japan has the “grass-eater” phenomenon: a large number of men who are not interested in dating women, and whose only concern is doing what makes them happy. You will likely lob standardized insults at them, like “creepy” or “selfish” or “misogynist”, but since they are no longer addicted to pussy, they have no pressing reason to care what you or any other women they don’t know think.

          Those western men you are jealous of? They are not scoring the Japanese Queen Bee. Instead, they are her prey. And once she has them securely in her clutches, the ugly truth will be revealed to them, and they will regret the choices they made, deeply.

          But then, I suppose that makes it less likely you will find a willing, docile, humanoid utility drone that you can exploit, so I can see how you would be upset.

          [–]aa223 1 point2 points  (2 children)

          It is a shame that Japanese men are still addicted to pussy but they just prefer synthetic relationships. Not to mention men are judged by the three highs which are high education, high wealth, and high height. And men expect Japanese girls to always be cute. But the women in Japan are taking up masculine roles that men used to take up.

          Here is a video on this: http://youtu.be/7PKwcJVa3dU

          [–]guy2435 0 points1 point  (1 child)

          Yup they have found a synthetic alternative. And with the advent of these life-like love dolls(NSFW) and vastly improving virtual reality techs, synthetic sex is getting better. I'm not into these things, and I'm all for the survival of the species, but this amazes me. And the video explains why this is becoming a norm in japan. I'm beginning to be concerned what the future of my grand children will be (if I ever get one). Anyway thanks for the video, it was informative, and fascinating to learn.

          [–]aa223 0 points1 point  (0 children)

          Yeah I think if the video can serve as anything it can be served as shock therapy to those who are blue pill and rely on the synthetic to get around. I mean the guy in the video got lucky but how about almost everyone else who got screwed over by a women who they thought would marry them eventually? It is heart breaking to say the least.

          But don't let that prevent you or your children from playing video games and the like but just warn them if they do get exposed to those kind of video games. Also, Japan is a fucked up place which is why it is only good for a tourist attraction.

          [–]_Dog- 1 point2 points  (5 children)

          Interesting. I read articles like this and I think of my sister, an American woman in every sense of the word. We grew up in a rural area. She always worked hard on herself. From counting calories to maintain a size 0 through her 20s, to getting a doctorate while having two children, who she does raise as she only works one day a week to stay frosty within her field. Sure she is materialistic, but grounded due to her upbringing. We've had many red pill discussions masked as general conversation, and in my mind she is what feminism was meant to be. She was able to educate herself, find man, and is being the mother to her children instead of running from her responsibility in favor of a career.

          Want to know how to get a woman like this? Well, her partner (as marriage to her is silly) is a former national rugby player current ER doctor from Argentina. Status, wealth, strength, and looks that's how.

          [–]Doctor_Mayhem 0 points1 point  (4 children)

          While your sis makes a great exception to the rule, she still proves the rule.

          Quality women like your sister are in such short supply, that you essentially have to be a former pro-athlete turned doctor in order to get them.

          [–]_Dog- 0 points1 point  (3 children)

          That was my point. There are american women who do not fit the mold laid out by the author in the article, but your smv had better be up, so get movin.

          [–]Doctor_Mayhem 0 points1 point  (2 children)

          Great as she is, sounds like way too much effort for what a man is getting. Much easier to be a tatted loser and bang 18 year olds.

          [–]_Dog- 0 points1 point  (1 child)

          What sub is this? That is the exact mentality which scares unicorns. Sure it's easy to be a looser, but that's why they're loosers, because they do not have the will to do any better. In one breath you say she is the exception which proves the rule, and in the next you're saying that it's probably too much work? Have you learned nothing? What are you here for? So you can learn what it takes to manipulate teenagers into having sex? Or what it takes to make yourself to a higher value man?

          It sounds like too much work? Man the fuck up.

          [–]Doctor_Mayhem 0 points1 point  (0 children)

          You had me going up until you tossed out "Man the fuck up."

          Good job.

          8/10

          [–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (4 children)

          The Who knew this in 1970. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cl4GWOkvDeM

          Funny enough, they're Canadian.

          [–]1Watermelon_Salesman 12 points13 points  (1 child)

          Your link is broken, but I'm guessing you meant to say the "Guess Who", who are, indeed, Canadian, and the song is "American Woman", which was also recorded by Lenny Kravitz.

          "The Who" is a british band from the 60's, the best rock band to ever walk the earth. This song is just as epic - and I don't use this word lightly - as Queen's Bohemian Rhapsody.

          [–][deleted] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

          I knew I should have proofread that post. Thanks for the correction!

          [–]Di-eEier_von_Satan 1 point2 points  (0 children)

          Histrionic - Histrionic personality disorder is a mental health condition in which people act in a very emotional and dramatic way that draws attention to themselves.

          Learn something every day!

          [–]watersign 1 point2 points  (1 child)

          ive heard people say the same thing about german and french women as well..the feminists have won over there. hope its not true

          [–]kanaduhisfruityeh 0 points1 point  (0 children)

          Pretty sure Western European women are about the same as North American women. Maybe a bit less obese though, except for the British one who are up there with Americans on the weight scales

          [–]Wheatspin 0 points1 point  (0 children)

          I like how at the end of the article, after talking about how American women are viewed in poor light, she literally says "why aren't men taking the blame for this?"

          That sentence that you wrote? That is literally why non-Americans hate you and call you a blame-dodging princess. How can you possibly attempt to make other people take responsibility for your actions and then not be viewed negatively?

          [–]wildchild11 -3 points-2 points  (1 child)

          These articles are 4 years old...don't get why it's getting a popularity surge suddenly

          [–]HalfwySandwch 0 points1 point  (0 children)

          Well what stood out to me in the first article was when she said that she dressed in a slinky skirt and the construction workers wouldn't even cat call her. That falls in line with that woman walking around the ghetto getting cat called and bitching about it.