top 200 commentsshow all 403

[–]riverraider69 496 points497 points  (28 children)

Oh god, the hamster in that thread... "It's just a number!" So is the room temperature, but let me see you ignore it if it suddenly doubles.

[–]1sailorJery 177 points178 points  (0 children)

yo, I'm crying over that room temperature line

[–][deleted]  (10 children)


    [–]jiveraffe 21 points22 points  (0 children)

    Hurrah for cognitive dissonance.

    [–]CrimsonDeep 6 points7 points  (2 children)

    Installed, then uninstalled immediately. I never keep plates on my facebook... Nor am I really ever on it

    [–][deleted]  (1 child)


      [–]CrimsonDeep 15 points16 points  (0 children)

      Oh shit, thanks for the update

      [–]Davethe3rd 4 points5 points  (2 children)

      How do you find out what your score is?

      I'm curious...

      [–][deleted]  (1 child)


        [–]RPIreland 51 points52 points  (4 children)

        Funnily enough she used to be a gonewild poster, take from that what you will.

        [–]ETH_Zurich 35 points36 points  (1 child)


        [–]dat_shermstick 28 points29 points  (0 children)

        Misogynist is not the preferred nomenclature. Shitlord, please.

        [–]foldpak111 42 points43 points  (2 children)

        "my count is about 25 I am also 20F.. I regret some, others I wish I had the chance to do again. To some people sex is a big deal, to others its just another good time. overall I am not ashamed and you shouldn't be either regardless of your count. You do you, girl!"

        Spoken like a true plate.

        This. You're having fun and I'm assuming no one's getting hurt. You're all good!

        "Don't pay attention to the people that say you shouldn't be going out and enjoying yourself either, 99/100 times they're the ones nobody would want to fuck anyway. Get out there and be smart"

        So true. Guys who dominate uni classes, constantly self educate through reading, and are built like zyzz are definitely guys no girl would want to fuck.

        "I'm in the 150/175 range. That count shouldn't matter and I'm 25. My bf has been with like 9. Neither of us care. I know what I like and teach him. He asks questions and tries new things. We are happy sexual people and it's okay."

        Bet you anything she's cheating. She basically said she dominates her boyfriend. I mean, my girlfriend teaches me some things, but she's in graphic design and I like learning whatever she's learning. That's a petty form of domination that doesn't decrease attraction. But her teaching me sexually? That's a death sentence.

        "Going through a pretty rough period in my twentieth year, I turned to alcohol and casual sex to cope with everything else that was going wrong in my life and must have slept with about twenty people in the space of three months, all unprotected and mostly incorporating some of the most depraved and humiliating sex acts, all to help me feel like I was in control. It worked, looking back I realise I could have gotten myself into serious trouble and thank whoever is watching over me that I didn't. I've since got off the downward spiral and count these experiences to be ones that have been the making of me. I'm much more conservative now when it comes to partners; I'm still an animal in bed but everything is safe and consensual, and I very rarely do a sex whilst intoxicated these days, making sure I remember it fully both during and after!"

        This is what beta's need to understand. women are extremely dirty in the bedroom and she's not doing that with you. That's what happens to you when you are not red pill.

        Fuckin extreme delusion in that thread. Oh my god people are directionless. Brb loving myself

        [–]falcon10474 10 points11 points  (1 child)

        But, but, wah!!!!! Men don't get shamed by how many partners they've had, to them it's just a number, it's hypocritical and patriarchy.

        Yea bitch, men get judged by a different number, it's called our paychecks.

        No dude has ever said "that bitch don't make enough money for me", but Godam is that a sound effect for women

        [–]King_of_Demons 6 points7 points  (0 children)

        That dude freaked me out.. How you be so creepy that you weird people out with a paragraph.. That dude sounds like he raped those army guys..

        [–]1redpillbanana 383 points384 points  (58 children)

        People are almost always selected based on their past behavior, e.g. work history, credit record, publication record, criminal record.

        But sexual history? How dare you.

        [–]verus_mas 109 points110 points  (14 children)

        And the funny thing here is that she is judging the guy based on his past history too. "Red Piller? Omg case closed"

        [–]screamingATtrees 83 points84 points  (13 children)

        "You read my post history and you just finished telling me that the past doesn't matter so you should just accept me for who I am now.

        ;) "

        [–]Algermas 130 points131 points  (6 children)

        The irony of using a TRP posting history to discredit someone while you're trying to argue that the past is irrelevant is gold, I mean it's just perfect.

        [–]foldpak111 23 points24 points  (0 children)

        I agree. It was an amazing click in my brain. One of those holy shit moments. Lol I was a red pillar an hour ago but the past is the past so accept me for me because NYAH

        [–][deleted] 20 points21 points  (0 children)

        I always see that and it's always a cop out. It's never oh you're a redpiller, I'll tell you why you're wrong. It's oh you're a redpiller, you lose the debate.

        [–]Of_course__But_maybe 4 points5 points  (0 children)

        "But you're not a red piller in the past, you're one now. So we can judge you all we want."

        Never underestimate the hamster. I've actually seen this rebuttal used on reddit before.

        Still, you can adjust the argument by saying, "You slept with X many people, it's not in your past, your sexual history follows you." But it's fruitless to debate SJWs or white knights.

        [–]flyingwolf 7 points8 points  (0 children)

        You mean its hamster, just hamster.

        [–]dan_legend 32 points33 points  (2 children)

        "You read my post history and you just finished telling me that the past doesn't matter so you should just accept me for who I am now.

        "You assholes should be ashamed of yourselves because of your "spinning plates" how dare you think less of this woman who is also "spinning plates""

        oh well, it was fun. I'm banned from /r/sex now.

        [–]blandboringusername 28 points29 points  (0 children)

        Never tell a woman she is wrong about anything on a subreddit with lots of female moderators. Making women have bad feelz or rationally question their closely held convictions = banning offense.

        [–]foldpak111 2 points3 points  (0 children)

        Don't forget the mainstream people view there lives like it's a fuckin episode of ABC's lost. You know, through the lens of extreme biased emotions. Introduce logic and you will be banned

        [–]WilkySan 8 points9 points  (1 child)

        "Wow just wow, it's like not even the same thing omg"

        [–]Christian_Kong 247 points248 points  (32 children)

        Its just so unfair, I was fired from my past 3 jobs for stealing from them. The job interviewers are theft shaming me based on my past. I want to have a good long lasting career and want them to have the best of me(who I am now), but as soon as they hear I have stolen in the past they do the old "we'll call you" line.

        OT: That line is the 2nd most upvoted on the thread, must be all those crazy misogynistic red pillers!

        [–]Endorsed ContributorRedBigMan 48 points49 points  (12 children)

        LOL... You made my day with the comment about 'theft shaming'... Oh man next time someone brings up slut shaming that's certainly going to be something I pull out to show the stupidity of anti-slut shaming stuff.

        [–]FrostCorp 28 points29 points  (0 children)

        As much as this sounds like a good idea, you forget that women don't have the mental faculties to see it this way and will go in to bitch mode before you finish your first sentence.

        Remember, a woman can never be incorrect, right? She can bitch a little and no one will cry foul over it, different story when it's a man.

        [–]dan_legend 6 points7 points  (9 children)

        Just be ready for the good ole "double standards" response that follows. Obviously evolution dictates that we as men are to have as much sex as possible to spread our genes but I don't know what the great emotional comeback for that is that would shatter a white knight.

        [–]AnotherLostCause 39 points40 points  (1 child)

        The answer to that is "There is no double standard. If you said you didn't want to fuck/date/marry a guy because of his partner count no one would bat an eye and lots of people would publically say you made a good choice."

        [–]Overkillengine 3 points4 points  (0 children)

        Hell even a lot of us here would probably say it is a good choice as a man with a high partner count is very likely to pump and dump.

        BP Women are the ones enforcing/rewarding that double standard, not us.

        [–]no_face 13 points14 points  (0 children)

        Support the kleptomania acceptance movement

        [–]cormega 2 points3 points  (5 children)

        It would be more analogous if we were talking about a woman who cheated in her last 3 relationships. A single woman isn't betraying anyone by having sex with people. An employee is betraying an employer by stealing from them.

        [–]speed3_freak 2 points3 points  (6 children)

        Guarantee I'll get some shit for this, but I completely disagree that sexual history and criminal history are the same. Some chicks like sex, and that doesn't make them bad people. Sure I'm not going to LTR a chick like that, but I'm not going to think less of her as a woman for it. Criminal history is intentionally hurting another party who (probably) doesn't have it coming to them.

        There are three things in this world that I absolutely hate, and those are a liar, a cheat, and a thief. Sluts are like BP guys. They give away what they think the other person wants and because it makes them feel good (momentarily). I feel bad for them and think that they should value themselves more, but I hate someone who takes what isn't theirs.

        [–]Christian_Kong 14 points15 points  (1 child)

        Commiting a crime doesnt exactly make you a bad person either. People get judged by the things they have done in the past. Thats all you can really judge a person on.

        [–]Overkillengine 5 points6 points  (3 children)

        Well, there is the issue when a slut tries to lie to themselves and others about their stable relationship potential.

        Most of us don't mind a low effort woman for sexual gratification purposes. But statistically, they ain't good relationship material.

        [–]NotTheFlash 32 points33 points  (1 child)

        I didn't get into harvard law based on my grades from last years, how dare they judge me based on my past ?!? It's just numbers ! I've now totally changed, became mature, left partying behind me and am now ready to find a nice job and settle down! How dare you consider someone else, just analyzing numbers ?!? You're just afraid of someone different and empowered !

        Honestly that's bullshit and every guy in that threat is either lying to himself or hopeless. Also, lots of people from that thread said they don't want to know their partner's count... Ignorance is bliss i guess, and warmer than the harsh truth that we embrace.

        [–]foldpak111 5 points6 points  (0 children)

        Guys get livid about it. I embrace it. I'm extremely open about sexuality and that eases women into revealing who they truly are. Instead of being a little bitch about it (80% of men), I LTR, plate, or next. When a guy get's like that he's coming from a scarcity mindset. Social conditioning destroys mens masculinity. Then TRP comes in and let's men know they can be entitled and actually get away with it. Then the guys get really insecure around us and white knight, which leads to awkward looks from the chicks as they grip me tighter. Haha the enlightenment is great.

        [–]cock_pussy_up 1 point2 points  (0 children)

        Not to mention the tendency of young women to reject men based on their lack of sexual experience.

        [–]Algermas 168 points169 points  (14 children)

        Most of us would not hire a convicted felon, because of their history. Nobody blames us.

        Most of us would not leave our children alone with a child rapist, because of their history. Nobody blames us.

        Most of us would not let Bernie Maddof handle our money, because of his history. Nobody blames us.

        Most of us would not get surgery from a surgeon who had his past 100 patients die due to negligence, because of their past. Nobody blames us.

        Most of us wouldn't lend money to people with a shitty credit history, because of their past. Nobody blames us.

        In every avenue of life we predict future behavior based, in no small part, based on past behavior. Except when it comes to fucking dozens, even hundreds of men a year, because that's slut shaming.

        [–]ilirm 64 points65 points  (6 children)

        My Psychiatry teacher gave me the best advice in life. The best predictor of future behaviour is past behaviour. I still follow his advice to this day.

        [–]NotTheFlash 12 points13 points  (0 children)

        That's a good advice, true for a vast majority of people. It goes along the lines of a great women advice someone gave me one day : "Second chances don't ever matter because women don't change". But beware, there still are people in this world who are strong enough to wake up and do what other can't : Change. These people go by the name of RedPillers.

        [–]theycallme1 128 points129 points  (59 children)

        Holy shit. One chick said 150-175 range and I'm 25"

        [–]Endorsed Contributor2comment 167 points168 points  (14 children)

        She's not just 25, she's empowered.

        [–]doveenigma13 120 points121 points  (6 children)

        She's a hole in a mattress.

        [–]JACKDOGBOB 2 points3 points  (5 children)

        Must be like throwing a hot dog down an empty hallway by this point...

        [–]flyingwolf 34 points35 points  (3 children)

        That's not how vaginas work.

        [–]Libertarian-Party 30 points31 points  (2 children)

        "But wait, call the Alpha Phi Nu Fraternity now and double your Empowerment FREE!!!tm "

        [–]Endorsed Contributorcocaine_face 20 points21 points  (0 children)

        In the Hamster-English dictionary, as far as I can tell, "empowered" translates directly to "slut"

        [–]MUTHAFATHAGENTLEMAN 14 points15 points  (0 children)

        I want to take out an ad in the newspaper.

        "Hey ladies! Feeling down? Not excited about the state of your life? Need a little empowerment?

        Call The Empowerment Boys! Johnny Steel and his crew will cum down and pump you full of empowerment!"

        Long-term satisfaction not guaranteed.

        [–]chewy_dragee 27 points28 points  (1 child)

        If she keeps it up she'll be 2 to the empowered of 25...

        [–]crazydave1979 6 points7 points  (0 children)

        She's probably also single

        [–]dat_shermstick 131 points132 points  (25 children)

        That number is just tremendous for a 25 year old. If we assume she started having sex at 16, that's a new guy every 18 days for 9 years.

        In high school, it seems like it would be harder to run up a huge partner count, just based on time in school and logistics. So that new guy rate probably skews toward the 18-25 years.

        Now, assume at some point, she got in a monogamous relationship for a few months here and there -- and subtract out maybe 2 years where she was off the market. It's more like a new guy less then every 2 weeks, and that pacing is going to vary.

        That girl is a whore of epic proportions. If she wasn't tricking, that's ridiculously high.

        [–]theycallme1 58 points59 points  (0 children)

        The breakdown is mind blowing. It's like having a savings account. Sure dip into it every once in a while to splurge on something, but if you bought everything you ever'd be worth nothing. Much like this chick.

        [–]ilirm 48 points49 points  (15 children)

        That number is just tremendous for a 25 year old

        Let me tell you a story. I banged a couple of college girls in my day. My most recent one was in Texas at the campus of a very conservative baptist university. It was very expensive and very white. I was there to study for a licensing exam, she was taking graduate courses in social work for 23,000/semester.

        Anyways, after a couple of bang sessions, for some reason she wanted to know my notch count and well i relented. i was at 31 or 32 at the time. She said she recently hit 29, which i thought, OK that's a lot but shes lower than me at least.

        Then i remembered how she told me she lost her virginity at 21 to some random she found on craigslist who posts virginity taking ads. Apparently he was really sweet and totally not a serial killer at all. This was due to her fear of being slut shamed on campus so her great idea is "hey i should go on craigslist". Incredible.

        She was 23 when i met her and barely a 6. Her only good features are due to the fact that she is still young, but that wont last her very long. This means that since she lost her virginity, till she met me, she consumed an average of 1 cock/ month, with a couple of extra Christmas and holiday cocks down in Mexico or what have you.

        When i asked her why she went into a shitty paying career choice, and how she affords her tuition, she explained that her corporate lawyer father pays for everything so she doesn't have to worry about trivial things like that. Reminds me of that song, hey mister by Custom.

        She intends to settle down when she gets out of her hypergamic phase, she is fully intent on getting married to a christian guy, but so far has explored her sexuality to its fullest. She has been sampling 3-somes, some BDSM shit she told me about, banging a bunch of black dudes (a big no-no in, the south so i hear), and generally being completely shameless for the most part, including letting me pull out her tits at a bar, which almost got me booted, haha.

        This is a below average college girl, i shudder to think what the pretty ones could get away with.

        [–]TekkomanKingz 17 points18 points  (5 children)

        If she's a 6 and has had 30 guys at 23 then a 7 or 8 probably has had 50-70, then it probably dips back down for 9s and 10s.

        [–]no_face 28 points29 points  (2 children)

        Actually surveys show that ugly/fat women slut around a lot and the hot girls are more choosy.

        Its easy to see why, ugly/fat chicks get pump and dumped, while hot girls are kept around (plated/GF/LTR) by even by super high smv alphas

        [–]ilirm 7 points8 points  (1 child)

        im gonna have to agree here, this girl was a solid 150 lbs at 5ft3. But still very bangable and well put together. Body type was the girl at the bottom of this page. I gave her a 6 because by comparison to some of the bitches at Baylor, she is butt fugly. There was some quality talent there, son.

        [–]dat_shermstick 7 points8 points  (0 children)

        I bet geography is a huge determining factor as well. Think about a rural girl at a small college or in a small town versus an urban girl in a big university or metropolitan center.

        [–]JayViceroy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

        I think the rating system, personally, is on a bell curve. In which 8/9/ is wifey material and usually don't have that high of a partner count because they can be a bit more selective. 5/6/7 I have seen come around my group of friends and 80% of them bang the girl and then she disappears.

        [–][deleted]  (4 children)


          [–]JACKDOGBOB 18 points19 points  (3 children)

          Im a church guy as well. I just have no idea where Im going to find a virgin to marry that isnt butt ugly. I have no faith in the typical church girl as I find them to be some of the biggest sluts and incredibly hypocritical.

          [–]refutesstupidnotions 4 points5 points  (2 children)

          You're right.

          These girls operate on a system where it's better to beg forgiveness than to ask for permission.

          [–]PlanB_pedofile 16 points17 points  (2 children)

          Trying to imagine fucking 175 women. Shit tiger woods had 13 and he was declared a sex fiend.

          That would be every girl on the volleyball, basketball, dance, and cheerleader team. Plus every girl in marching band.

          Then go into town and say hi to the girl at starbucks and fuck her.
          Go out to the movies and meet the chick at the ticket counter, fuck her that night. Had I want a nighttime snack so i hit up Denny's and fuck the waitress after her shift.
          I need to fill up my gas tank and end up fucking the gas attendant.

          1. Jeeze that would be like logging onto Facebook and having every person in my newsfeed be someone i stuck my dick into.

          [–]junkytrunks 3 points4 points  (0 children)

          tiger woods had 13 and he was declared a sex fiend.

          That is just what he published. Only he knows the true number. Could be 13. Could be much higher. Professional athletes who travel simply have opportunities that the common man does not. In addition, there is a groupie-like mentality out there that exists for some of these men.

          [–]sway_usa 1 point2 points  (0 children)

          Sounds like Californication

          [–]Newdist2 21 points22 points  (0 children)

          If we assume she started having sex at 16,

          No, it's OK. She started having sex at 14, according to the thread.

          [–]Endorsed ContributorRedBigMan 12 points13 points  (0 children)

          Naw man you need to go younger. She probably started at 12 years old and when she hit like 18 she realized she could use vajayjay to get $$$ just like mommy used to.

          [–]DevilishRogue 4 points5 points  (0 children)

          Any girl of even average attractiveness could easily get such a figure by 25 years old if they aren't particularly discerning (and frankly even if they are they could still manage it without much effort).

          [–]Doomblaze 2 points3 points  (0 children)

          Its certainly doable in college, especially if shes attractive. Go to a party friday and saturday, bang one guy each night. Most guys arent gonna say no.

          [–]FooleryCommaTom 44 points45 points  (2 children)

          And some poor loser is her boyfriend... Yikes.

          [–]Diarrhoea_Shower 29 points30 points  (1 child)

          I bet she made him wait too.

          [–]gopher_glitz 10 points11 points  (0 children)

          Probably had nasty crazy gangbangs and would lose it if he even suggested a 3 way.

          [–]NotTheFlash 22 points23 points  (0 children)

          In 5 year ~, some guy will be lucky and put a ring on her finger, i'm so jealous that i will never find such an empowered women. /FuckingS

          [–]MHOOD01 19 points20 points  (1 child)

          I believe that's the same girl who said she has had the clap and herpes in her comment history.

          Got some nasty bitches in that thread.

          [–]justskatedude 2 points3 points  (0 children)

          I don't care about count if you don't have herpes but try finding someone over 10+ who doesn't have herpes. It sucks that most STD tests don't test for herpes anymore because doctors consider it a non issue.

          [–]thebillstone 12 points13 points  (4 children)

          Can you imagine hitting that without a condom and she tells you she slept with that many men afterward? lmao

          [–]dickholedoug 5 points6 points  (2 children)

          Why would you ever hit it without a condom on without knowing that first?

          [–]thebillstone 6 points7 points  (1 child)

          It happens sometimes unfortunately.

          [–]dickholedoug 5 points6 points  (0 children)

          I can understand, such as super hot new girls or alcohol. I know some people that make a habit of it.

          [–]sway_usa 1 point2 points  (0 children)

          It's one of the reasons I never rawdog.

          [–]dickholedoug 2 points3 points  (0 children)

          That's just ludicrous. The stats on sti infection are not in her favour at all. Also, when the quantity is that high, the quantity has to dip some times.

          [–]midnightbean 2 points3 points  (0 children)

          You can find a picture of her in her submissions.

          I can't imagine how people have slept with 100 people period, that's just insane to me. But I do have a friend who told me her female friend slept with 30 guys in a semester, that seems like sleeping with at least a couple guys people per week. To be a woman.

          [–]csmass 5 points6 points  (1 child)

          Could you even feel anything in that vag? I banged a chick once that has 125 partners and it was like throwing a hot dog into the grand canyon. I mean shit... I'm not small, nor am I Long Dong Silver, but I couldn't feel a god damned thing.

          [–]AnarchyBurger101 4 points5 points  (0 children)

          That's because the 125 partners were just in the last 4 months, and represented several NBA teams. :D

          [–]Endorsed ContributortrpSenator 35 points36 points  (2 children)

          Why would a big number be a turn off if she's healthy and you two get along well?

          Because she's NOT mentally healthy. If a woman is that socially deviant, then their mentally healthy and come with baggage. EVERY, and I mean EVERY mega slut like this I've EVER met have mental health issues and/or a lot of baggage.

          [–]Tarnsman4Life 10 points11 points  (0 children)

          If she is taking that much dick, she's probably not physically healthy either. Herpes, HPV, to say the least.

          [–]desylid 6 points7 points  (0 children)

          To be honest, I am far more turned off by a woman who has had 20-50 partners that she lies about compared to a woman that has had hundreds of partners. Once sluttiness gets to the extreme end of the spectrum it becomes as attractive, if not more, than the single digits.

          I understand completely why men like Charlie Sheen and Bill Maher date only porn-stars.

          I personally haven't experienced much difference in the mental health of women across the spectrum. In fact I've had much more non-sexual (and of course sexual) fun and intellectually stimulating conversation with extreme whores compared to the near-virgin, supposedly wholesome girls.

          [–]asiank1ng 95 points96 points  (15 children)

          I fucking hate how we can't even state our own preferences (a woman having a high kill count = turn off) without being torn to shreds. He wasn't even trying to start a verbal argument, but shit went to the roof when they found out he's a "red piller".

          But women can talk about how they're not attracted to overweight men, men with small dicks, men who are bad at sex and more all over reddit? Fuck that

          Some ignorant ass people.

          And yes, having a high kill count is not LTR material. Why? Because why should a man invest into something that has been given away so freely in the past? The only thing a woman has is her pussy and if she's willing to toss that around for a little validation and attention, that shit isn't for me.

          Sure, sex is just "sex". But ask the divorced man who caught his wife cheating with an alpha male due to his lack of sexual pleasing. Is sex just "sex"?

          Or how about this for you feminist tards, if your man cheats on you because you let yourself go and he's found someone that understands his need for a woman who looks physically attractive and satisfies his need for sex with a HOT woman... is sex just "sex"?

          [–]Transmigratory 34 points35 points  (0 children)

          In these sort of subs, you have the loser women who get overly hurt by these things.

          The women who aren't losers aren't on Reddit/the internet with this crying/whining shit. They're out in the world not being losers.

          [–]Tarnsman4Life 13 points14 points  (0 children)

          That is part of feminism; you have no right to question any action a woman takes nor decision she makes. You have to accept her for who she is and not judge her no matter how poor her life choices. Once that last shred of accountability is eliminated for women then they will truly be "free".

          [–]Algermas 42 points43 points  (9 children)

          Sex is just sex, it doesn't matter at all.

          Until someone takes it against your will because that's, like, worse than murder!

          Either sex has gravitas or it doesn't, make up your minds ladies.

          [–]PandaMania3 9 points10 points  (3 children)

          A wise man once said, everything is about sex. But Sex is about Power

          [–]JudgeRedPill 8 points9 points  (0 children)

          Imagine a man saying after being caught cheating saying, with tears in his eyes, "I have needs to be met!"

          He would get rightfully laughed out of the room.

          [–]garlicextract 43 points44 points  (3 children)

          The problem is they all say "but WHY is promiscuity bad if she doesn't have an STD" and no one is telling them why. Personally, it's due to pair bonding and dead beadrooms but they will just deny that

          [–]Transmigratory 40 points41 points  (0 children)

          These sort of women cannot stand that they cannot have something due to choices they made.

          Thus when a guy says they cannot have him because of the choices she made, they rage.

          [–]JohnPeel 19 points20 points  (1 child)

          To be fair they'd have to admit that they were somehow irreparably damaged by their actions. They're never going to do that as it would mentally destroy them.

          So they lie, but they're lying to themselves just as much as they are lying to everyone else.

          [–]packem 18 points19 points  (1 child)

          Just think, some lucky man will get to put a ring on that ho.

          [–]UncleDisgusting 19 points20 points  (2 children)

          I think what's never been said, is that 50-60 years ago, if a woman had more than 5 partners, she'd have been labelled a slut or a whore. Now it's not politically correct and the massive hamster gives these women a carte blanche sense of entitlement to not feel the shame they should be feeling. It's like they want it both ways; they want to be praised and unjudged for riding the cc, but at the same time, they want to feel as undiminished in value as the women who, at the age of 20, may have had 1 or 2 long term relationships. Sorry ladies. You want to have your fun, good for you. But you are not suitable long-term partners/girlfriends/wives. You chose this, it's in your nature. Stay on the carousel and know your place. Know your nature; you don't want LTR's so don't feed us that bullshit when you crash into the wall and you're pushing (or over) triple digits.

          Edited for grammar.

          [–]j-coordinate 2 points3 points  (0 children)

          yes mate. this is what im trying to say. they don't want LTRs, they all want to ride the CC hard.

          [–]crayonsred 51 points52 points  (1 child)

          This is the slut's version of "Am I Fat?"

          Why exactly anyone would answer is beyond me.

          [–]JudgeRedPill 21 points22 points  (0 children)

          "Do all these guys running a train on me make me look slutty?"

          [–]MossadOwnsPOTUS 14 points15 points  (7 children)

          Initial Reaction: 70? Meh.

          Then: "[20F]"? 70!? WAT?!

          That's 10 a year since she was 13. Somebody has daddy issues.

          [–]JACKDOGBOB 4 points5 points  (0 children)

          No somebody needs to be institutionalized.

          [–]YaBoiTibzz 109 points110 points  (7 children)

          First two words "Throwaway obviously." Lmao. No matter how much they might claim otherwise these people are still ashamed of what they've done.

          [–]Redrog1 31 points32 points  (4 children)

          This is not a fair comment, but it gets repeated a lot here.

          Whether you are personally ashamed of it or not, you can still acknowledge that most look down on it and strategically keep it in the low.

          Most here do the same with reading and participating in r/trp. I'm not ashamed but I prefer to never admit it to avoid backslash.

          [–]abcd_z 14 points15 points  (0 children)

          I'm reminded of the Nash Grier controversy. For those of you who don't remember, he was a 16-yo teenage boy who had a 4.2 million members following him on Vine. He released a Youtube video talking with his friends about what they looked for in women (shave your armpits, don't be obnoxious and loud, etc.) and his followers absolutely crucified him.

          [–]PublicallyViewable 3 points4 points  (0 children)

          Agreed with this strongly. There's a lot of things I do online that I'm not ashamed of, but that I wouldn't want other people to know about due to backlash.

          [–]Transmigratory 1 point2 points  (0 children)

          Actually the throwaway account makes sense. You realise some of these Redditors have no life. Thus they are ones who spend their life looking at the post history of people and trying to use something that offends them to make a nonsensical point.

          That's why throwaways are recommended to us if we want to participate in subs where the commenters have no life. Now subs like investing, real estate etc... they're similar to TRP in that they actually have a life. Looking at a posters past history and crying over shit that they disagree with is by far the last thing on their mind.

          [–]garlicextract 29 points30 points  (2 children)

          So what if I failed to pay my last 3 loans back on time? Don't credit-shame me shitlord, that was in the past!

          [–]Algermas 17 points18 points  (1 child)

          What do you mean I can't work at a daycare? So what if I've been convicted of child molestation 17 times, that's in the PAST!!!

          [–]BluepillProfessor 10 points11 points  (1 child)

          OMFG: The rodents are running wild.

          "It's like a boyfriend getting self conscious about his member because he pressed his girlfriend for the size of her previous boyfriend's member. She doesn't care and still enjoys him, but he may be self conscious about it. That would be his problem with self confidence not something that should limit her. Frankly, as long as she stays safe and healthy it shouldn't have any negative effects. The men who would be intimidated by previous sexual experience so much so that they would not date her are not worth engaging in a relationship with."

          "Here's how I look at it. I like to Fuck. I'm going to keep fucking until the day I die. And when that day arrives and I'm on my death bed you think I'm going to be thinking "oh if only I hadn't fucked so many guys..." that will be the last thing on my damn mind! So why do I care about the #? Do what makes you happy. Be smart and safe about it. I was sexually abused and understand this plays a part in my sexual behavior. But when it comes down to it we ALL like to Fuck, some just more than others."

          We could power our civilization for years if we could harness just the hamsters in this thread.

          [–]Tarnsman4Life 19 points20 points  (0 children)

          I think about partner count, like I think about cars. If I am renting a car for a day or two, I really don't care how many drivers it has had, I don't care that the last renter and 3 of his friends really tore it up, I don't care that they drove it through the mud. Now if I am going to buy a car, take responsibility long term for that car, I really prefer to be the original owner because I know 100 other guys have not been up in it fucking it up.

          Now you will find people who buy rentals and you will find men who wife up a self confessed slut who has taken more than a football teams worth of cocks in a few short years, but I ain't one of those guys. Its OK though; the world needs those guys, but the world needs men like me too or else there would be no motive to sell new cars at all, nor would there be motive for high value women to keep their count low or better yet to none at all.

          [–]strodiggs 8 points9 points  (0 children)

          I was once told, "Take the number of sexual partners a man tells you he's been with and divide it by three to get the REAL number. Take the number a woman tells you and multiply by two."

          [–]TheBadGod 28 points29 points  (0 children)

          If she can't say no to dick, how can I trust her to say no when raising my child?

          I might be mistaken, but I've associated folks with high standards and a strong resistance to others as good parental material.

          [–]StattMan 7 points8 points  (0 children)

          I like how the women expected the man to have slept with equal/more. What a dumb bitch.

          [–]aa223 10 points11 points  (0 children)

          Ah slutting around in your 20's. Good in the short run but in the long run it will fuck them up.

          [–]thebillstone 5 points6 points  (0 children)

          Some guys in there say they've slept with over 100 women and they're in their mid 20's? suuuuure

          [–]ALargeBicep 7 points8 points  (1 child)





          175 and your boyfriend still shares spit with you? Holy shit, holy shit, holy shit. I need to crawl under a rock. I'm done

          Edit: now I remember why I don't ever occupy /r/sex, /r/relationships or any other sub along those lines. Their rationalization for insanely high sex partners is so absurd, it's almost comical to watch these nitwits talk. God damn.

          [–]watersign 2 points3 points  (0 children)

          i saw that and chuckled. her bf is an obvious loser with low SMV.

          [–]iShotMarvinInTheFace 5 points6 points  (0 children)

          If I told you that you could open up a new soda pop or drink one that had had seven penises in it, which one would you prefer? - Cleveland Brown

          [–]1iluminatiNYC 23 points24 points  (4 children)

          Why advertise who you aren't willing to date, particularly if they aren't approaching you? One of the benefits of being a guy is rejecting a girl by simply not approaching them. Now if someone volunteers to ask why, feel free to answer honestly. Just telling a woman that she isn't dateworthy isn't going to motivate her to settle or improve herself. If anything, it gives her extra motivation to climb into her feelings, and there's no shortage of that.

          In other words, learn when to shut the fuck up.

          [–]Nantafiria 16 points17 points  (0 children)

          This may be true in the actual world, but when a guy wants to ruffle some feathers on reddit/disturb the local griup think, that's his own prerogative, and it's not gonna have any negative consequences on his part.

          Still, it is valuable advice. Don't be a pedant where people's feelz can bite you in the ass.

          [–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

          You're right, the guy got sucked right in. Interesting to see the results though.

          [–]WardlyHasted 13 points14 points  (1 child)

          Do you know what girls with a reasonable partner count don't have? Feelings of shame based on the number of partners they've had.

          Normally, when I regret a decision I've made, I learn from it. I don't keep repeating that decision over and over and over again until I start to feel ashamed of myself for my behaviour.

          She is ashamed with herself for having sex with so many random men, but continues to have sex with random men. I don't understand how women live with a brain that can rationalize this type of shit.

          [–]DesertFox1986 21 points22 points  (2 children)

          I know I will probably be downvoted for this, but I think it is bad for both males and females to have many partners. 70 is an absolutely unreal number and I can't believe how many people are responding with "well I have had over 100 so it's not big deal". This is STUNNING to me. YES it is a big deal because it shows insecurity, a lack of respect for yourself and a lack of an ability to foresee consequences of your actions. I have a feeling that these people with triple digit numbers are mostly trailer trash uglies having sex with other trailer trash uglies because most people with an ounce of respect for themselves are a lot more picky and choosy about who they fuck. That's just my 2 cents, take it or leave it.

          [–]hohamocha 23 points24 points  (6 children)

          Always remember that it is 100x times easier for a woman to get sex than a man. So if she overindulges in something that is very very available to her, she should be shamed. Just like a fat person is shamed for overindulging in food in a first world country. However if a man has sex with many women, he should be praised because he has managed to find exactly the thing that is scarce to his kind. Its similar to how a starving beggar somehow gets an idea that will help him get a lot of food legally. Of course he would be praised for that.

          [–]persune 2 points3 points  (4 children)

          I would be interested in your opinion on men who seek men, and women who seek women, regarding numbers of partners.

          [–]hohamocha 3 points4 points  (2 children)

          Anything goes for the gays, since their sexuality does not follow evolutionary or reproductive goals.

          [–]ObsidianOne 12 points13 points  (0 children)

          "A key that opens many locks is regarded as a master key, however, a lock that opens with many keys is just a shitty lock".

          [–]vpwnz 20 points21 points  (1 child)

          If the number doesn't matter, why is there so many throwaways in there?

          [–]Algermas 20 points21 points  (0 children)

          It doesn't matter and only virgin neckbeard losers care..

          .. but we have to fight those virgin neckbeard losers tooth and nail BECAUSE IT DOESN'T MATTER TO REAL, CONFIDENT MEN!!!!!!!

          If only losers care and these virile, confident men don't care why are you so upset?

          [–]dan_legend 10 points11 points  (2 children)

          "you have been banned from posting to /r/sex: Sex."

          [–]acartoontiger 2 points3 points  (0 children)

          I got banned too for commenting. They really dont want to hear any negative discourse

          [–]-Tyler_Durden- 28 points29 points  (14 children)

          Imagine if you could go out every Friday night and sleep with a different woman while having little to no game, only being a 6/10, and making $40,000. How many partners would you have by 25 or by 30?

          I don't think women with high partner counts are bad people or pariahs. They can be fun to go out with; however, a man should never marry or even LTR one. It's the same reason you shouldn't marry someone who's an alcoholic or addict who's been sober for years. Being casual friends with these people is okay, just don't enter into a legally binding financial agreement with one of them.

          [–]jm51 2 points3 points  (0 children)

          Imagine if you could go out every Friday night and sleep with a different woman while having little to no game, only being a 6/10, and making $40,000. How many partners would you have by 25 or by 30?

          That was Douglas, Isle of Man, in the early 70s. 6 or 7 young females to every young guy. All away from home and nothing you could catch that wasn't cured by penicillin. Every ok looking guy going out alone in the evening got hit on. (Any night of the week during the seasaon.) First night sex was a given. Numbers weren't mentioned, nobody cared.

          [–]JACKDOGBOB 10 points11 points  (4 children)

          No they certainly are bad people. Sluts are some of the worst people imo because they exploit a certain power they have to the detriment of society as a whole. If you all havent put two and two together yet, promiscuous women are quite literally the deathspell of the western world. How else do you explain non replacement level birthrates, 60% divorce, and the ever increasing perversities that are becoming commonplace in our culture? Its the sluts that cheat and divorce rape. Its the sluts that use their bodies to get places as opposed to the hard working man who gets passed over for a promotion. Its the sluts that are shitting out all these bastard children and literally STEALING from the taxpayer in the form of government assistance because they become single mothers. The promiscuity among young women is an act of selfishness and should be roundly condemned.

          [–]1Dev_on 2 points3 points  (0 children)

          you explain it by prosperity, all of it. Again, you're confusing correlation with causeation.

          Right now, western culture is in a golden age. We've never had it so good, and since the chance of dying is so low, people have a few changes that they do through, as a society.

          1. less children, you don't need the high amount of working aged people to support you in your old age.

          2. social revolution. When you lived in the colonies, not only did you need 10 kids because two die of dysentary, and the other 8 have to take care of you. You also had to hate homosexuality, revel in war, and stone women for being adulters. Why? Becuase the first is physically preventing there from being another generation to protect you as you're older. the second is because theres limited resources in a pre-abundance world, and war thins the herd, making more available for the survivors, and finally, because otherwise you get tribal warfare, blood feuds, and the social bond breaks down.

          None of this stuff is happening because we are goign to hell in a handbasket. It's because we've never had it so good, that we don't need these strict social norms anymore. If the zombies start coming, you'll see traditional gender roles, and very stoic coming back pretty quickly.

          It's where the saying 'there are no femenists in a housefire' come from

          [–]crbirt 3 points4 points  (0 children)

          Oh my God that was horrible. That dude (I could sense it was a dude) trying to make the guy's apparent unwillingness to fuck someone who's already been fucked 70 times the last decade an "intellectual" decision, and then trying to change his mind. The original responder was not even baiting, but people jumped on him for simply expressing his opinion. And of course every man literally would and should agree, how on earth could it be irrelevant if your potential partner has had more than 70 different partners? If not irrelevant, explain how I would want my female partner to have had 70 dicks in her mouth, ass and vagina? Why would I wish that upon myself. And, if any of those feminist whores are reading this: I personally do decrease the amount of sex partners I have because I find being a whore extremely disgusting and completely against all I stand for, and I do feel just as disgusted by men doing the same thing. Perhaps even more, because men are supposed to gain confidence from work, not from being physically attractive (which one night stands are all about any way). However, I don't fuck men so it's not as important on a practical level.

          Sometimes I just want to repeatedly stab people in the gut for being stupid. So stupid it hurts. Trying hard to not hate all women right now, but it's hard. I guess.

          [–]DudeZoltan 3 points4 points  (0 children)

          TL;DR of the /r/sex thread: "Stop judging people on their conscious, intended actions!"

          [–]Totsean 12 points13 points  (0 children)

          Well, the guy you're arguing this with is a red piller.


          [–]darthsmokey 2 points3 points  (1 child)

          He even said nothing wrong with what she is doing. But he personally would not date her, as it is turn off for him. Nothing wrong with raising your own opinion when talking about your own preference. Shit was wrong with people getting butthurt over the simplest thing.

          [–]Lt_Muffintoes 2 points3 points  (0 children)

          Reading those comments is like walking through a triage centre. The amount of brokenness is unreal.

          Consider this: people with tattoos often try to normalise them and encourage others to join them. This is in their own interest, since both normalising self harm and having others self harm, reduces the relative negative impact of that damage.

          It is unsurprising, therefore, to see sluts attempting to normalise their damage.

          [–]Waldo00 3 points4 points  (0 children)

          A major determinant of value is rareity. A women who has slept with loads of people is not rare at all. She does not represent scarcity and value at all. She is literally saying to you I'm not very picky, you don't have to be that special for me to fuck you. Now a women with little to no partner count says I'm that diamond worth more than the rest cause my body is rare and it takes someone really special to open me up. And that makes you feel like the fucking man. It works in a similar fashion for women except nt with sex but emotion. If your new girl found out you loved, and I mean really loved every girl you went on a date with she would run away. in her mind your a whore and none of these girls earned your love. You are not special or rare and you don't make her feel like a women by making her earn your valuable rare love. It is too bad that we can only love each other through posession one of the body the other of the emotions ( soul?) none the less this is the basic model of human bonding we have. It is just another example of crushing the masculine. Nowhere do people and women just accept that these are things men want it is jut smash them down fuck them for wanting this shit. Patriarchy!!!!

          [–]Lumberjack1234 67 points68 points  (38 children)

          This is something I don't agree with most of redpillers. I don't believe sex ruins a woman that much. She has been with 100 people? It really is just a number.

          What I do believe is that it takes a certain type of girl to go riding the cc that hard. You can see the poster here. She is young yet so used up that no sane man would take her. But we also know that she was abused when she started fucking at a young age.

          My opinion is that sex with many people does not ruin women. They were already ruined before they started.

          I think people should stop thinking "you slept with 60 guys, you have become damaged goods" and go for "If you have slept with 60 guys you must have some mental issues that I don't want to deal with".

          I think the reason that for thousands of years society viewed sluts as disgusting is not because of what they did but because of what they are.

          [–]Endorsed ContributorRedBigMan 77 points78 points  (7 children)

          Sex doesn't ruin a woman for purposes of sex... but it does ruin a woman for purposes of commitment. You don't commit to a slut or play captain save-a-ho.

          [–]Philosophers_Legacy 31 points32 points  (2 children)

          I think what /u/Lumberjack1234 is saying is that what it shows about a women is that she is unable to commit, but the partner count is just an indicator of the problem. A woman like that has issues to begin with and the high partner count is just a symptom.

          Overall, I agree with his view.

          [–]Endorsed ContributorRedBigMan 3 points4 points  (1 child)

          Good point... I suppose I can agree with that but I think high partner counts come from women with lack of self-control. The sad thing is our culture not only discourages self-control in women it encourages a lack of such. Women see women on TV throwing shit fits and flinging frying pans at their man and think that's acceptable behavior when it really isnt.

          [–]1Dev_on 2 points3 points  (0 children)

          thats the point. unhealthy sexual history (abuse) low self control, self esteem issues. Hell, even the fact that the time could have been better spent than going after guy 70.

          If you get someone who has none of those issues, and still had 70 dudes, I probably wouldn't care (unless one has issues not having higher numbers. ego is a bitch) but so often, the plates I've had showed me it's a good indicator of problems that I just don't want to have in a woman

          [–]PlanB_pedofile 8 points9 points  (1 child)

          By the time she is 32 and had 400 cocks she'll want to settle down and find her nice guy whom she only fucks 12 times a year.

          [–]cock_pussy_up 2 points3 points  (0 children)

          She'll probably also emotional torture him in revenge for all the men who pumped and dumped her in the past, and because he's not as good as the alphas who used to screw her. Then she'll divorce rape him.

          [–]AssedM 19 points20 points  (0 children)

          Its most likely both. Its the classic chicken or the egg situation. Psychologist studied it with spankings. It turns out the population of people that got spanked as a children have a lower mean IQ than the population that didn't. Then the question was brought up that is the spanking causing the drop in IQ or is it that kids with lower IQs already are more likely to act out and receive a spanking. Through multiple studies, they eventually determined it was a bit of both and after the initiation of the first spanking events, the child sort of undergoes a positive feedback loop of worse behavior due to being spanked resulting in more spankings.

          I believe you can use the same principle for sexual behavior for a girl. Most girls first time having sex is in a relationship, not a ONS. I believe every girl hopes their first will last forever. When that relationship breaks, she is hit with the reality she lost her virginity and gained nothing for it (commitment/marriage). Subconsciously, she will view herself less valuable and this is the first hit to her mental health (becoming damaged). In more extreme sluttiness, its most likely being sexually abused by a family member however. I think most guys here would agree that a girl thats sleep with only 1 man prior is not damaged and almost ideal since you don't have to deal with a sexual history or the virgin over attachment. To the girl though, she has already lost her virginity, what is stoping her from fucking as many guys as she wants now, the MSM says that is good and healthy right? So through each new sexual partner that ends up pumping and dumping them, the will start to feel less and less valuable thinking something is wrong with them because their sex cannot achieve the commitment they truly desire. They might start even becoming more sexually deprived (anal, pissing, etc.) thinking that making the sex amazing and super kinky will earn them the commitment but it only further reinforces the view they are a sex object when they don't achieve it.

          [–][deleted] 37 points38 points  (7 children)

          Who really cares how you think about it though? You don't need to justify it, both viewpoints end up at "Next".

          It's just like looking at woman who is overly tattooed/pierced. It's not the physical marking of their skin that ruins it, it's the type of person who would do that.

          [–]Lumberjack1234 24 points25 points  (6 children)

          Well, it really does matter. I have seen many men getting divorce raped by their low-number wives who then went on to make up for the years they lost (riding the cc hard)

          It's not the physical marking of their skin that ruins it, it's the type of person who would do that.

          This sums up my view point nicely.

          [–]ilirm 12 points13 points  (0 children)

          This reminds me of another story about a girl from Texas, this one was a divorced mother, 22 years old who got married early (19). She divorced her husband and started riding the CC. I asked her why she divorced him (actually they were'nt even divorced yet, just separated she had the papers on her desk).

          I said "was he abusive? Did he hit you". Negative "Was he a deadbeat? Didn't work? Negative, he worked 10 hour shifts. "Is he not a good father to the kid?" Nah, apparently he's very doting. The reason for the divorce was that she felt trapped and needed to explore herself in an eat pray love sort of romantic way they tell you is okay nowadays. The kid stays with the father half the week, i didnt even get to see him (which is good).

          I banged her in a savage manner and made her "unlimited gina tingles with no responsibilities" wish come true that night.


          [–]GhostInTheRedPill 12 points13 points  (6 children)

          The higher the number the more desensitised they are. By all means pump and dump to your heart's content (use protection), but how much loyalty will she have for you as dick number 172? Maybe they are not all damaged, but they are spent.

          [–]Lumberjack1234 8 points9 points  (2 children)

          Did you read what I just wrote? You just repeat a dogma without using reason.

          but how much loyalty will she have for you as dick number 172?

          What I said was that the high number count is a symptom, not the cause. She would not be loyal even if you went back in time and took her before her first dick. She is fucked in the head before sucking the 2nd dick

          [–]GhostInTheRedPill 7 points8 points  (0 children)

          Whether a high count is the cause or symptom of low LTR value is irrelevant. The results are the same. Plus there's more than one reason for slut behaviour.

          [–]1iluminatiNYC 6 points7 points  (2 children)

          My opinion is that sex with many people does not ruin women. They were already ruined before they started.

          I think people should stop thinking "you slept with 60 guys, you have become damaged goods" and go for "If you have slept with 60 guys you must have some mental issues that I don't want to deal with".

          Repeat that again for the cheap seats. That's what I've been saying since I've been on here. The crazy is what you are ultimately running from, not the notch count. The notch count can distract from a LOT of issues, and that's where a lot of Red Pillers get screwed up. Focus on the crazy, not the body count.

          [–]BrunoOh 2 points3 points  (1 child)

          It's a bit of chicken and egg.

          Feminism let the sluts expose themselves as sluts, but also encouraged girls to be sluts.

          [–]1Dev_on 1 point2 points  (0 children)

          yup. It's not that anyone cares about the dick riding (I'm sure there are some who don't like having lower numbers) it the type of issues it tends to be a side effect of.

          And I really wish guys would stop parroting the line about infidelity and CC... It's a good statistic, but I guarantee no one makes decisions from it, and just use it as an excuse not to be honest with themselves

          [–]LibertarianLibertine 0 points1 point  (0 children)

          Fair and interesting point of view, many do seem to have major psychological issues and thus turn to slutty behavior to validate themselves.

          Either way, the actual number is the symptom of the disease, and thus important to look at.

          [–]Grainslol 7 points8 points  (1 child)

          It's just some statistic. I wonder how many sidewalk cracks I've stepped on in my life. That's a number too.

          "Who cares if there's a 50% divorce rate and the child has a coin toss to grow up in a single-parent household. It's just a number."

          Edit: The people in the thread are either fellow sluts looking for solace or white knights. This does not represent all demographics but it's still rather alarming.

          [–]barmaleo 4 points5 points  (0 children)

          If you combine all the dicks she had it would make a 9 meter pole, lol.
          But dicks and promiscuity aside, I'd agree with /u/Lumberjack1234 that number is an indicator that this girls is bad news, primarally to herself. Whatever she compensates with men has to be delt at some point of time be that validation issue or addiction or trauma from abuse. If it is not sex she may also seek refuge in drugs or gambling or any other crap that helps people keep their troubles away.
          All this bullshit gonna grow and grow and it willl only going to get worse once she decides to move on and settle down. First, because of shame and stigma she will be hiding her past, then lying about it, then living with the fake persona and experiencing dissonance because of that. She's just gonna spiral down and gonna take few people with her in her misery.
          She has a lot more to worry about.

          [–]Wish_I_Was_Savvy 12 points13 points  (6 children)

          All thse sluts fuck everybody but me :(

          [–]JACKDOGBOB 7 points8 points  (0 children)

          Heres the thing I dont get. If you are going to be a slut that fucks 70 people, why be so choosy and discriminatory? Lol. Just be honest about who you are.

          [–]Nan_Ren 12 points13 points  (1 child)

          You're not missing much, seriously.

          And if you're a dude who hasn't gotten laid much, someone like that is the absolute last thing you need in your life. They will do everything they can to take advantage of that chink in your armor.

          Edit: I was just asked to elaborate on this and I'll put my answer here because it applies:

          To a slutty chick, sex doesn't have much or any emotional meaning - it's more of a tool, a currency. With an inexperienced guy, that currency is way overvalued because sex still has that deep emotional content for him. He usually hasn't learned to separate sex from love yet and that's a really dangerous situation.

          I've seen times where some slut gets a decent guy and wraps him around her finger because she fucked him a few times. He might not naturally be a beta, but all of a sudden he's married and is a stepfather to two kids because he lost his head over sex.

          [–]LewisSkolnick 1 point2 points  (0 children)

          Interesting post. It's nice to read of situations that offer different dilemmas than the ones frequently posted on this board which feature over-simplistic archetypes. (This isn't a complaint, we use the over-simplified archetypes for the purpose of teaching the fundamentals to the uninitiated.)

          [–]Entele 2 points3 points  (0 children)

          Look I agree. What she did was wrong. But she is clearly asking for help because she realizes what she did was over the limit. Its a bit harsh to put someone down when they are asking for help guys. Its not about white knighting. You cannot defend having fucked 70 guys. But you should probably give them some constructive advise.

          Ohh but the people saying "you should not be ashamed"? Should climb into a trashcan my god.

          [–]slimcoat 4 points5 points  (0 children)

          Gotta love this:

          Basically, his post history answered my question.

          So it's okay to judge somebody by their post history, but not by their sexual history?

          The hamster never stops.

          [–]colombianguy 4 points5 points  (0 children)

          Women feel guilty about their high partner counts because they know somewhere deep in their beings that there is something inherently wrong with having sex with so many people. Guys certainly know it and it's why instinctively we are so repulsed by it.

          I wonder how many generations more will pass until people finally figure out that Feminism pushing women to suppress their feminine instincts and instead behave like and compete against men leads them inevitably to unhappiness. And more than that, it tends to harm them, her children should she choose to have them (usually late in age, which increases chances of birth defects, and inevitably in a divorced, single-parent household), and the people around them, such that its deleterious effects ripple far outward over the fabric of society.

          [–]rubberbandnot 3 points4 points  (3 children)

          I always remind myself of the redditors meet-up picture posted here not long ago when I wonder how can people post such bullshit answers. And then it all makes sense.

          [–]miss_sogony 2 points3 points  (0 children)

          As much as we all love some outrage porn they are all insecure because they know we WILL and reserve the RIGHT to judge them for it, and IT is a number they can't change and know they have fucked up.

          These threads are for their own validation to make them feel better about life before going out and slutting about next week.

          [–]eagleshigh 1 point2 points  (1 child)

          It's just a number This. You're having fun and I'm assuming no one's getting hurt. You're all good! Don't pay attention to the people that say you shouldn't be going out and enjoying yourself either, 99/100 times they're the ones nobody would want to fuck anyway. Get out there and be smart

          This guy. Yea, encourage women being a slut. Where do people get these values?

          [–]GhostOfAladdin 1 point2 points  (0 children)

          So she started at age 14 and is now 20. That means she is averaging 12 new dudes a year.

          Her feeling ashamed is a consequence of all those dudes who have railed. Hopefully she can find the right therapist.

          [–]seattleron 1 point2 points  (2 children)

          See how young these girls are who've been with between 25-150 people? These chicks are in their early 20's, do you noobs now see what is meant by the Cock Carousel and why women end up settling with a beta bucks and never fuck his dull ass?

          Never believe a woman's number. Ever. Ever. She can get laid at any day and time with no effort at all.

          [–]BlackHeart89 1 point2 points  (0 children)

          Jesus fucking christ! She said her number is in the 70s! Indicating that its 70+. And she's only 20! Wtf...

          I've always been open to women doing their thing. 24 and slept with 15 guys? Whatever. 30 years old and been in 2 gangbangs? Cool. I'll have to think about that one.

          But 20 years old and already been fucked by over 70 different dudes? Thats crazy. She's useless at this point. Burned out way too early. Not even plate material anymore. Nothing wrong with what she did, but her value has hit well into the negatives at this point.

          [–]Transmigratory 2 points3 points  (0 children)

          The user in question, the one who attempted to play SJW, is obviously some insecure/edgy person with hang ups about gender dynamics.

          [–]petricakerempuh 2 points3 points  (0 children)

          The interesting question is - why has the movement against slut shaming evolved in the society, even though on a deeply instinctual level everyone knows that the a sexual partner count hurts the long-term prospects of pair bonding and diminishes woman's sexual value in terms of exclusivity to her man. It's a relatively new phenomenon confined to the West, absent in most traditionalist societies.

          The answer is simple: by giving women more freedom in sexual selection the process of culling the unfit males from the gene pool can be optimized. The traditional marriage arrangement optimized for social stability, tax revenues for the elites, and the number of kids per family (i.e. the human capital). The new arrangement optimizes for the best genes since the elites in the West are no more interested in having healthy families as the building blocks of the society - armies are professional and much tinier, the skilled workforce can be imported, and most economic activity is no longer created by human effort. It's amusing how the lofty social movement like "feminism" are ultimately merely high-level manifestations of basely evolutionary imperatives.

          What is even more interesting is that the unfit males who are the least likely to procreate are the most ardent defenders of the female sexual freedom. It's likely a combination of their futile hopes to get some pussy for themselves while women are in their "exploration" phase, of the white knight instinct to protect women in all circumstances even from the vile attacks of the red pillers who dare to hurt their hamsters with truth, and of the hopes that once she finishes riding the CC she'll settler for the BB like him just like the most important woman in their lives, their mom, did.

          [–]squirtmasterd 1 point2 points  (0 children)

          I love easy girls, they make me feel far less guilty when I get bored of them

          [–]rpodhod 3 points4 points  (0 children)

          Seeking one night stands with women is like selling drugs to children. Motives and morality aside, it is detrimental to them. Don't act surprised if they lash out with false rape accusation in revenge. Angry comments on reddit are nothing in comparison.

          And don't lie to yourself, there is something wrong with those women, it is not some guy's personal preference.

          Be that shady guy with funny tasting candies, or don't, but do yourself a favor - make your choice and own it.

          [–]Ulfberht14 1 point2 points  (4 children)

          Women can have male DNA in thier bodies from intercourse alone for the rest of their lives. Some studies show that this dna from previous partners can have an effect on future offspings appearance. So this girl has all kinds of guys dna in her body for life.

          [–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (2 children)

          Do you have any kind of source on this?