You know which post I'm talking about - if you don't, go google "emsk redpill" if you haven't already read it.
I know this is a wall of text, but if you have the time, do read through it.
The EMSK post mentions "flipping the power dynamic" of a hot, popular school girl who has boys bend themselves over and bow their head to her just to get a whiff of that young, beautiful pussy. That is correct. I DO want to flip that script. But I don't intend to "break her like an animal". I don't intend for her to suffer, nor will I allow it. I believe that power dynamic to be natural - amoral, not immoral. Lumping a healthy, functional difference in power together in the same category with straight up abusive things such as tricking a man out of a house or his money is a disingenuous straw manning.
The root of that dynamic is in the difference between sexual market values - The hottest chick at that school has IMMENSE sexual market value. The type of value that not even gorgeous, ripped movie star men who make 20 million a year will ever experience. She could literally walk down the street and get fucked by any man she wants. What we see in that scenario is simply her value at work - she's high value and so she attracts men. These men are so desperate for her attention that they sign a one-sided contract for themselves, where they hope that their goods and services (carrying her books, doing her work, supporting her, listening to her troubles, defending her etc.) in turn will buy them sex from her. Of course, as any person who converted to redpill after experiencing the life of an orbiter (aka friendzone) knows, the covert contract is fucking useless - a pussy-ass cop-out to avoid having to improve yourself, and will yield no results. But it is not immoral of her to accept the positive side effects of her high value in a scenario like that. It would be wrong of the chick to disrespect him afterwards, yes. But it is not wrong of her to take the things she gets for free.
The (almost) mirrored image of the hottest chick at school is the alpha male. He's rich, handsome, funny, successful, respected - a real catch. This man's commitment (time, attention, exclusivity etc) functions in the same way as a woman's pussy. Women will bend themselves over backwards just to get a taste of that sweet, sweet commitment and they are so desperate for it that they too might sign a covert contract where by giving the man their goods and services (SEX, cooking, doing the dishes, cleaning) they can buy commitment from him. But once again, the man never signed that contract, and it is not wrong of him to accept what is given to him because of his high value. It's not wrong that his commitment is worth more than most other men's.
Women have a moderate sexual market value just by virtue of having a pussy. Men do not have ANY default value by having a dick, and so they must artificially create value in the form of status, money, looks, humor, excitingness etc. If a man could fuck a woman in a cardboard box, he wouldn't buy a house. And no man has ever gotten pussy just because he has a dick.
High value females will be able to live a life of constant CC and still have enough beauty left at an older age to land a dude that gives them at least some level of ginatingles before hitting the wall, or land an alpha male that agrees to commit to her at a younger age. Low value women can live a life of constant CC, but when the wall approaches, they have to settle for a lowly betabux that they don't respect while reminiscing about the alpha men that they wish they had landed but couldn't.
High value males have all the options open for them - they will be able to fuck this 80% of women ranging from low to high value (the other 20% are just straight up unfuckable) their entire lives, have multiple girls try to buy his commitment with sex and in the end dump them for the betas to grow old with, while they can go get a fresh, young girl or several. Girls who think he's the best thing they ever heard of. Girls who consider him their first choice, not their 10th.
Low value males won't be able to fuck the 80% of women more than every once in a while if they're successful, and because their commitment isn't worth much, they have to give much of it to get sex, even from a low value woman. These low value males settle for sexless relationships and often settle down with a hag that's been worn out by alpha cocks.
This is the nature of how the sexual economy works - the high value rule and the low value get ruled. There HAVE to be losers in order for there to be winners. You just want to make sure you're on the winning side of that dynamic. And that's why redpill exists, among other things.(the 80-20 rule is not set in stone and there are exceptions, but it's a good framework to help analyse the situation)
The EMSK post is Nirvana fallacy, wishful bluepill thinking, because it rejects the reality of the sexual marketplace. This is stupid. All human relationships are transactional in nature. If you want a lot, you have to give a lot.
u TalShar tells women that if they just wait and do nothing, their perfect, handsome prince who personifies the top qualities of both alpha (ripped, confident, rich, high status etc) and beta (sensitive, caregiving, providing, supportive) on a white shining horse will arrive. No he fucking won't. You will hit the wall, dry up, become old and wrinkly, your sexual market value will plummet and you will have a hard time even finding a guy to SETTLE for. That is, a guy that doesn't utterly fucking disgust you.
And to men he says that if they just wait and do nothing, their perfect unicorn, the perfect 21-year-old with a gorgeous face and a tight body with tits and ass who sucks and fucks you 3 times a day and makes you delicious food and plays video games and tosses jokes around with you will arrive. No she fucking won't. You will live your life as a borderline incel until you end up as the miserable betabux of some post-wall hag who rewards you with sex twice a year for being her emotional punching bag, while you're lusting after gorgeous women on instagram that are getting plowed by the alphas while you fap.
In reality, there isn't a special someone out there for everyone. There's a special someone for SOME, and we're talking a tiny, tiny fraction of people who got incredibly lucky and landed the love of their life without the need to play any kind of games. But this is not the reality for most. The reality is the sexual marketplace. And in this marketplace, there is a small group of people who are "the one" for almost everyone, and a massive group who aren't "the one" for almost anyone.
Patrice's boat analogy (synonymous with dread game) is great here - the man is a sports fisherman on a boat and the woman is the fish in the lake. The sports fisherman catches the fish, then releases them back in the lake. Sometimes a fish jumps back in the boat after being released, and once it's in it will start asking "Why do you need a boat?? You already caught me!". However, if the man goes to the shore and gets rid of his boat, the fish will go "PSSH, this is the guy that I allowed to catch me? Look at him, he ain't even got a boat! Imma go back in the lake until I get caught by a REAL fisherman."
See this is where redpill also gets it right - You having the boat is what keeps the woman from becoming a pissy bitch. She has to smell fish on you so she can act right. If she doesn't think you're a real fisherman, she will have 0 respect you, and your marriage or oneitis-LTR or whatever romantic disney movie bullshit you think works, will devolve into a shitfest of neither side deriving any satisfaction - the woman doesn't feel like she's gaining more from you than you're gaining from her and acts like a rude cunt towards you, and you're not getting laid or having a friend in your wife.
This is just sexual strategy. A scenario where the man is winning is preferable because strength, confidence and leadership are desired traits for a man - and the presence of said traits (among the presence of high SMV) is what keeps the woman attracted. This is why it's crucial for the male to be better than the woman in the relationship - the woman must feel like the man has other options, like the man settled for him. Like she won. A scenario where the woman wins is a loss for both parties, because the woman is unhappy because she can't ever adore a weak man and in turn the man never gets any sex.
And let's be real, this is where most marriages end up. A lot of the time it's not even evident - parents usually want to set up a charade to protect their children from the hardship of divorce and only get the divorce when they feel it won't hurt the kids as badly. And again, the root cause of this widespread failure is the bluepill mentality of denying the very existence of sexual market value, and males completely lacking any kind of strategy, defaulting them to losing to the woman.
That's my biggest problem with the EMSK post - you can't choose to not take either pill. It's either or. Choosing to deny the very existence of your own sexual market value and women's natural AFBB tendency has the exact same end result as choosing the blue pill and remaining low value. "Punching Morpheus" is not an option. The option you are actually choosing when you think you're punching Morpheus is taking the blue pill, putting your fingers in your ears and saying "I'M NOT LAZY, I JUST DON'T NEED TO CHANGE!! THIS TALSHAR GUY ON REDDIT TOLD ME IF I WAIT I WIN ANYWAY".
Not only is it a choice between red pill and blue pill as a whole, you can't choose to not play the relationship game either. As a man, denying the existence of female sexual strategy or labeling sexual strategy of either gender as "immoral" (hence having NO strategy) defaults you to losing. Women are always playing the game, whether they acknowledge it or not. Men don't have their sexual strategy built into them, so we must consciously choose it if we wish to win.
You can choose the blue pill, not have a strategy at all and lose, take the red pill but choose a shitty strategy and lose, or you can adopt the redpill strategy and win. However, only the last option (or a blind luck unicorn match made in heaven) can ever allow for a scenario where both the male and the female can have all of their needs satiated with minimal discomfort.