all 153 comments

[–]ThirdLegGuy 142 points143 points  (17 children)

To extend on this, one could also imagine two additional things:

1) Some men would have $20,000 every day and some would have only $5,000. Women would treat them differently. Some men would mix a good chunk of counterfeit money to their daily amount to make their pockets look bigger. And some men would never be able to pull out more than $3,000 a day no matter what they do.

2) The daily amount of money would be reducing over your lifespan. In your prime years you could easily pull out $30,000 per day and women would be chasing you like crazy, even trying to rob you at knife point in some dark alley. But once you hit 30 years old, your pocket would shrink to the size of a peanut, and female attention would vanish. Then you would become bitter and join some SJW club proposing that 'All men are valuable no matter how big their daily pockets are'.

[–]charlesbukowksi 62 points63 points  (3 children)

Women do treat their sexuality like money, but then again women existed before money, so perhaps we treat money like sex.

[–]ThirdLegGuy 23 points24 points  (0 children)

I think the more correct term would be 'asset'. But this asset requires maintenance and is deprecating in value over time. Basically, in terms of control theory, every woman solves an optimization problem of obtaining maximum social and long-term monetary gain by managing limited resources given her by nature.

[–]big_bang_theory 3 points4 points  (7 children)

But once you hit 30 years old

There's no such hard wall for men...

[–]ThirdLegGuy 23 points24 points  (0 children)

To convey the full analogy one have to imagine men are approaching this Monetary Wall at ~30 age.

[–]GhostOfAladdin 5 points6 points  (3 children)

Key word is Men. If you eat like crap and don't exercise in your 20's, the wall will be hit nearish 30.

But Men don't do that.

[–]1whatsazipper 3 points4 points  (2 children)

I think you're missing the point of that bullet. It's comparing men to women. See one of the next lines:

Then you would become bitter and join some SJW club proposing that 'All men are valuable no matter how big their daily pockets are'.

Do men do this? No. They also don't hit a wall at 30. Women hit a wall around 30 (realistically their decline starts mid 20's), and often take up inane complaining/SJW/wherehaveallthegoodmengone/fatacceptance/etc.

Key word is Men. If you eat like crap and don't exercise in your 20's, the wall will be hit nearish 30.

But Men don't do that.

People in general neither eat right nor exercise. If you do both consistently you'll improve your life at any age, especially your sex life.

[–]boscoist 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Don't worry, he is capitalizing the M in men and committing a no true scotsman fallacy. Men do that shit all the time, so do women, that's why obesity is the biggest issue in america right now.

[–]DrScrubbington 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If a woman takes care of herself she won't hit the wall nearly as hard, or at least extend it out to 35 or so.

[–]1whatsazipper 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Then you would become bitter and join some SJW club proposing that 'All men are valuable no matter how big their daily pockets are'.

You're right, but that point mirrors the female experience, not the male. It's a little strange the way he did that because it makes points 1 and 2 diverge. Point 1 can apply to men as is, but point 2 requires imagining that men follow a track similar to women.

[–]SwissPablo 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Despite women's assets depreciating over time, they still believe they're still high-value, and why not when there's always a demand?

Women will always want a part of that 10g's, no matter how old the guy, in the same way some guys will always crave pussy, no matter how old the woman - and if you think a woman of 50+ isn't getting attention, you can bet there are still guys gunning for them.

[–]Average_Black_Man 0 points1 point  (0 children)

30 is when men are in their prime...

[–]bobolino59 -3 points-2 points  (1 child)

The pocket analogy is even better, think loose vagina vs tight vagina.

[–]stanthebox 3 points4 points  (0 children)

He's trying to go on ugly girls vs 10's

[–]2pacBiggieisland 78 points79 points  (6 children)

Comedians have an excellent way of bringing Red Pill knowledge across, and the reason it's "funny" is because it's really a "hidden truth"

[–]Tom_The_Human 98 points99 points  (0 children)

“If you want to tell people the truth, make them laugh, otherwise they'll kill you.”

-Oscar Wilde

[–]ShitArchonXPR 5 points6 points  (0 children)

"True wit is Nature to advantage dress'd;

What oft was thought, but ne'er so well express'd."

--Alexander Pope

I might be missing a word or two there. I tried to write the full quote from memory without using Google, so go easy on me.

[–]Batemanx 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Kinda reminds me of the fool is Shakespeare's King Lear

[–]648262 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

It's a surprise that make sense, many "jokes" are like that.

[–]Cubixdealer -4 points-3 points  (1 child)

Louis CK is a genius with this stuff

[–]foomfoomfoom 61 points62 points  (14 children)

This belongs in a collection of trp parables.

[–]LAMFF 44 points45 points  (13 children)

Gather round boys, let me tell the parable of What if Everyman Has 10 G's In His Pocket.

[–]sparkleselite 16 points17 points  (12 children)

If I had 10 G's it surely wouldn't be wasted on sex.

[–]dherik 9 points10 points  (9 children)

Take a look at Dan Bilzerian's instagram feed someday. Fuck it, totally worth it.

[–]wittywittakers 11 points12 points  (0 children)

lol you need more than 10 G's to live like that, even for a day

[–]garlicextract 4 points5 points  (7 children)

Fuck that. Call me lame but I'd rather do something with my life than be Dan Bilzerian. Yeah shit would be fun but what a waste of potential

[–]BloodyPhallus 0 points1 point  (6 children)

What could he possibly achieve that he hasn't already? Business executive? Political office? He's already got sky-high money and status, respectively.

[–]garlicextract 1 point2 points  (0 children)

How about bettering the world in some way. How about investing that money so he can be like Warren Buffett in 25 years. HE hasn't achieved shit, he got the money from mommy and daddy.

[–]garlicextract 1 point2 points  (4 children)

How about bettering the world in some way. How about investing that money so he can be like Warren Buffett in 25 years. HE hasn't achieved shit, he got the money from mommy and daddy.

[–]BloodyPhallus 0 points1 point  (3 children)

He is living the ideal Western man's existence. He has the money and time to party every day around the world, doing cocaine and fucking a different 10 every day. He is already the top 0.01% genetically, in status, in wealth, in having done crazy fucking shit. He has no desire for legacy, and is living his life in perfect alignment with his desires.

To me, that seems like the perfect self-actualized life.

[–]Zendevilx[S] 0 points1 point  (1 child)

No desire for legacy?

His attention whoring is his tool for building a legacy. He is gaining recognition, status and fame with his lifestyle. All of these are forms of power.

[–]BloodyPhallus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There's only one kind of legacy.

The history of mankind is written in blood and semen.

[–]mythrowawaybruh 21 points22 points  (1 child)

Patrice was a comedic genius. His honesty held him back from the Kevin Hart fame and money that he really deserved.

[–]VTDante 34 points35 points  (0 children)

"Liars don’t like me. People who lie. People who live a lie. There’s people that love living a lie...

The term brutal honesty is a dumb term. Who wants their honesty, like, brutal should be associated with lying.

You’re a brutal liar. As opposed to somebody that is just going to inform you of what they believe the truth to be and sometimes what is the truth."

-- Patrice --

[–]512TechGuy 27 points28 points  (5 children)

So my wife over hears me listening to this video and now she is mad at me for what Black has to say on the subject, it must have been to true for her to confront, like it exposes her phoney ways.

[–]supitsLoki 52 points53 points  (4 children)

She's mad at you for something a video you watched said?

That's funny and sad.

[–]desylid 11 points12 points  (0 children)

She really going to be pissed at the poor bastard if she reads your comment to him.

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Entertaining ideas other than the approved dogma makes you automatically complicit in them. You are either with us or you're against us.

[–]1independentmale -1 points0 points  (1 child)

Welcome to married life. My ex used to lose her shit about everything. Movies, music, books, web pages...

"I can't believe you're watching that. Why would you watch something like that? You need to turn that off. That is totally inappropriate. It really says something about you that you enjoy crap like that. What is wrong with you? Do you think that's cool? It's not. It's not funny, it's not ok, it is completely unacceptable. Married men don't behave this way. That's not how you talk to a woman. Blah blah blah I can't even believe this blah blah you shouldn't blah blah married men don't blah blah church God blah marriage counseling blah blah."

Crazy fucking bitch. So glad that's over.

[–]supitsLoki 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That's not married life, that's life with a shit female.

This entire sub is devoted to us never being in a position you described, and many men here are married and happy. Just because your ex wife was a cunt and you stuck it out doesn't mean that your one shit experience is indicative of all marlied life.

[–]Dopebear 14 points15 points  (8 children)

Nice seeing another Patrice video, but those harpies and whiteknight really ruin his show. Be much nicer if he had some sort of podcast by himself.

[–]knacker123 11 points12 points  (3 children)

The Harpies get him fired up, which is when he is at his best.

[–]Dopebear 2 points3 points  (2 children)

Double-edge sword.

It's just a waste and annoying when there's multiple people trying to talk one another. An ugly sound and an ugly sight.

At least we have Patrice's work and videos. Better than nothing.

[–]knacker123 2 points3 points  (1 child)

In normal circumstances i agree it is an ugly sound but when you know Patrice is about to bulldoze his way through it any second now it makes for a great dynamic don't you think?

[–]Dopebear 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah, he has a few queues. Such as "whoawhoawhoawhoawhoa" or "turn her mic off"

If only we could do the latter in real life.

[–]stickfiguresk 4 points5 points  (0 children)

True, but the others spark conversation. This specific example may not of come up if the others weren't there.

[–]mrheh 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He's got a few podcast episodes and about 100+ appearances on opie and Anthony filled with rp knowledge

[–]smokingmonkey420 8 points9 points  (0 children)

This isn't even an experiment with imagination. Women quite literally are interested in your money.

[–]charlie_bodango 7 points8 points  (1 child)

That would cause hyperinflation.

[–]natufian 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I was thinking the same thing as I was reading it. I still like the analogy; especially if you were to imagine that the daily 10G ration was the only way to get currency-- Just like pussy is the only way to reproduce.

[–]Abraxas19 7 points8 points  (1 child)

"Bitch, I don't need a tutor!"

[–]3 Endorsed ContributorF9R 8 points9 points  (4 children)

I think $10k might be a bit high for the average guy. Something like $500-$1000 seems more reasonable, and is corroborated by escort prices. The moral of the story still stands, though. Good post.

[–]bluedrygrass 1 point2 points  (3 children)

I would never pay even 100 dollars to go with a bitch.

[–]Senorbubbz 4 points5 points  (2 children)

In Brazil some quick young (18+) pussy can go for as little as ~$10. It's hilarious to see hoards of guys walking around the brothels quickly checking out girls, scanning their bodies, asking for prices, some of them obviously on a break from work or school. Many of the girls even admit to keeping their work secret from their men and families. Experiencing all of this with developing red pill eyes is almost shocking.

[–]BloodyPhallus 2 points3 points  (1 child)

I know where I'm going for vacation. Brasil, aqui vou eu!

[–]Ted_From_Accounting 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Listening to this is the epitome of swallowing the red pill, a great introduction for blues pills making the transition.

[–]GhostOfAladdin 2 points3 points  (0 children)

J lo says her love don't cost a thing.

So i'm going with that. Thanks for enlightening me OP.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (1 child)

I don't think my desire for sex is equivalent to my desire for $10,000.

[–]1Zackcid -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It's simplified for a reason. C'mon dude..

[–]UrsusG 5 points6 points  (4 children)

Nice illustration, but it would just lead to inflation.

Soon the 10 grand would be worth what 10c is worth today and only men with 100 grand or more would be getting any sex. The situation would stabilize itself back to exactly what it is today.

(yes I know my math is off, it's just for illustrative purposes)

[–]ringostardestroyer 4 points5 points  (0 children)

10 grand is a metaphor for the pussy. Given the current feminist climate, women are willing to freely give it out, reducing the value of the pussy.

The analogy: pussy = money, LTR commitment = sex.

So now the value of pussy is inflated, and only the best of women get commitment/LTRs (non-sluts). It's the same thing.

[–]johnbranflake 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It would depend on the chastity of the men.

[–]dherik -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yeah, this doesn't jive with basic economics, but lets circle jerk about how awesome it would be.

[–]westsan 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That whole series of videos are amazingly on point. Splendid find; splendid analysis.

[–]fatfaggotfuck69 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I went to Costa Rica and stayed at the Hotel del Ray and this is pretty much how it was, except instead of $10k it was like $60.

[–]yobroproit 0 points1 point  (1 child)

This is a great post. But let me ask you a question--What if it was the woman who got the $10,000? Would we not do the same? The argument is predicated on an implicit desire to get the money--not necessarily human nature.

[–]Azothlike 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The idea is to illustrate what it's like to have an innate quality that other people want.

[–]utzy02 0 points1 point  (0 children)

RIP Patrice you were s great comedian and a great man. The true comedians comedian!

[–]cooltrip 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's a really nice work. Upvote.

A superior woman would not need to be hypergamous. Women are hypergamous because they are inferior. Women need alpha because they are inferior, they are not better than their pussies.

Female hypergamy isn't interesting per se, but as a proof of female inferiority (women are just fuck meat; otherwise, they would not need to be hypergamous).

Women are just hypergamous garbage (these two terms, "hypergamous garbage", explain each other).

A woman is just an alpha-seeking piece of fuckmeat. Never put an alpha-seeking piece of fuckmeat on a pedestal.

[–]trrrrouble 0 points1 point  (13 children)

A man has no up ceiling on how valuable he can become in the eye’s of a woman

Let's assume this is true.

but a woman can never be better than her pussy.

This is only true if the only thing you value in a woman is her pussy. Guess what, pussies are generally quite similar, but the stuff between the ears is sometimes a hidden treasure.

This line is PUA-specific, not true red pill if you are talking about seeing reality as it is.

[–]2 Mredpillschool 2 points3 points  (11 children)

The term "pussy" is referring to the whole body, not just a hole.

Even the most brilliant and funny ugly fat chick can get past the value (or lack there of) of her physicality.

[–]trrrrouble 4 points5 points  (10 children)

The term "pussy" is referring to the whole body, not just a hole.

How does that change anything?

[–]2 Mredpillschool 2 points3 points  (5 children)

He's saying a woman's physical attributes are her value.

I just demonstrated that effect by saying that intelligence is neither necessary to create attraction, nor the lack of it sufficient enough to remove attraction.

[–]trrrrouble -2 points-1 points  (4 children)

This is why I am saying that this is true for PUA style game, not LTR. You would only enter a LTR if you believe that the woman is somehow special, better than others - an outlier of some sort.

Intelligence / personality is a factor that can raise a woman's value higher than that granted by her appearance.

[–]Addictedtoiron 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A woman doesn't need to be super intelligent to raise your kids... it's better if she has strong family values and is emotionally stable. Intelligence plays a little role in her nature and we all agree that in general women is incapable of consistent logical thinking.

[–]FaithfulJinn 0 points1 point  (2 children)

You would only enter a LTR if you believe that the woman is somehow special, better than others - an outlier of some sort.

Not really.

The only thing that makes a woman special is her devotion to ME. A girl who was dumb and hot but 100% devoted to me would be far more special than a girl who was intelligent and hot and 70% devoted to me.

[–]trrrrouble 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Assume 100% devotion, you have two girls - smart and hot, and smart and dumb. Clearly, the brains in the smart one raise her value as a person above what is afforded by her looks.

[–]g_gggg 0 points1 point  (3 children)

The term "pussy" is referring to the whole body, not just a hole.

How does that change anything?

Well, it refutes this:

Guess what, pussies are generally quite similar

Also:

This is only true if the only thing you value in a woman is her [physical beauty]

I think the point isn't meant to be 100% all or nothing. Most guys wouldn't date the most beautiful women if she had an IQ of 40. But it's more generally true. Women - much more so than men - are valued for their physical beauty. That's why an ugly woman can't become attractive by being smart and funny and successful.

[–]2 MRedPillWatchTower 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That's why an ugly woman can't become attractive by being smart and funny and successful.

Well there's a whole shitload of them who apparently think they can do just this. Just head over to any online dating site and check out some of their profiles. Filled with profiles about their college degrees, intelligence level, and sense of humor.

It's like "bitch, I can't fuck your college degree, and I can't get a blow job from your career."

[–]Teeklin 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I guess? But so what if they can't become physically attractive? With all those other assets, it still makes them much more desirable as a partner than the opposite if what you're looking for is someone to share your life with rather than hook up with.

[–]natufian 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Guess what, pussies are generally quite similar, but the stuff between the ears is sometimes a hidden treasure.

Spot on. Despite the flak you're catching you're exactly right. To explain it more simply we could flip it into negative terms. If a woman's maximum value is limited by her beauty, she could still make a hot mess of herself by way of poor hygiene, constant bitching, questioning your authority, cheating, stealing or a million other ways. What's between her ears counts.

Now, despite TRP ethos, I don't even believe that a woman's "maximum value" as a human being is limited by her beauty. It contributes to societal and interpersonal limits, and such, but what the world wants to get from her, and who she wants to grow into as a human being is her own business.

I fucking loved this post, but I can see where that line is tripping a lot of guys up.

[–]the_optiomal -4 points-3 points  (13 children)

This is not true There will always be men that women would fuck for free.

Edit: very nice but not true

[–]a_murderer 4 points5 points  (12 children)

I think you've missed the analogy. The point is the genders are swapped.

[–]EvilNando -1 points0 points  (0 children)

fuck what a punch to the brain..

[–]korben_manzarek -2 points-1 points  (1 child)

After a while, when the man has lived his potential and followed fundamental male desires as a result becoming affluent and rich, he would no longer care about the 10 G:s. “I am better than 10 G:s”, he would think to himself and throw the money at the hottest women with no hesitation. “Take it, I don’t give a fuck”, would be his subconscious flow.

He now knows that he is better than the given 10 G:s which he had nothing to do in the begin with. He will feel great superiority compared to women and men who are not worth more than their 10 G:s.

What are you saying here? Why would a rich man throw 10g's around? That's not the way to stay rich at all.

[–][deleted] 14 points15 points  (0 children)

He's getting a fresh ten k every day without having to lift a finger, guaranteed. Why not just ride the currency carousel?