top 200 commentsshow all 357

[–]Evolved_Red 139 points140 points  (43 children)

Has someone created a 'thin, hot women' app yet? I'm sure its socially acceptable!

[–]blacwidonsfw 66 points67 points  (39 children)

Ill make one. Dont need 2m in seed funding either, just give me a few hours on my computer.

[–]Claude_Reborn[S] 73 points74 points  (29 children)

Shouldn't be too hard.

enter height, weight, age, upload pic and ask a few RP screening questions.

Anyone where Age > 26 gets sent to dev/null

anyone who's BMI is too high gets sent to dev/null

Has kids or won't answer that question ? ... dev/null

You could filter pretty damn well with just those parameters

[–]WRXminion 21 points22 points  (16 children)

Right.... Because women never lie, especially about weight.

[–]garlicextract 4 points5 points  (14 children)

It's not like you couldn't just "dislike" the photo...

[–]Claude_Reborn[S] 34 points35 points  (5 children)

They can add a " fat girl " report button or "she's lying is really fat " report

[–]CrimsonDeep 8 points9 points  (2 children)

I'm sure there is a way to sort out the secret internet fattie Myspace angle shots with an algorithm that'll automatically flag a profile with them. Also flag profiles with nothing but pictures of their pets if this so were ever to exist.

[–]Claude_Reborn[S] 4 points5 points  (1 child)

yeah, or you could just farm it out to the community at large, and have some sort of reporting score.

They accrue too many "fat points" they get purged and banned from the system. Of course you'd have to limit to males voting because females would false report anyone hotter than them and you'd see fatties going on a mass report rampage because they are jealous vengeful butter snorters.

[–]chillmonkey88 4 points5 points  (1 child)

They can add a " fat girl " report button or "she's lying is really fat " report

Spit my water out asshole lol...

[–]Claude_Reborn[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Think how much better dating apps would be with a "fat chick" reporting button !

Swipe left for no, swipe left for yes, swipe down for "Fatty!"

You would have to have your account to be "fatty enabled" in case your some sort of chubby chaser.

[–]WRXminion 1 point2 points  (7 children)

I'm confused.... What does liking a picture have to do with creating an dating site based on a RP algorithm? My point was: short of an employee checking each submission personally there are going to be higher then advertised BMI's as woman lie about their weight. So it won't be as simple as the parent post was making it sound...

[–]rockumsockumrobots 8 points9 points  (11 children)

Ooh this! I want an app that screens out crazy bitches.

[–]blandboringusername 11 points12 points  (3 children)

And no single mothers, dammit.

[–]rockumsockumrobots 6 points7 points  (1 child)

Agreed. No option for "has kids." Also, no options for "Bi." In my opinion, that's either a cry for attention to be an extra special snowflake (beyond the usual) or a signal that she has some deep seated issues.

[–]Claude_Reborn[S] 1 point2 points  (5 children)

Oh fuck.. you could adapt the DSM 4 for the diagnosis of "Cluster B" personality disorder" and you could do some excellent filtering on that alone.

BPD's and NPD's could be purged pretty accurately.

[–]drrtyfrrnr 3 points4 points  (1 child)

The problem is that the hot ones are disproportionately crazy (leaving aside the Tumblr SJW crowd).

[–]Philhelm 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That's called a homosexual dating site (all bitches are crazy).

[–]Bulldog44 27 points28 points  (3 children)

Seriously, name it No Fat Bitches.

[–]blacwidonsfw 10 points11 points  (2 children)

I like it. Want to be head of marketing?

[–]redpilltom 6 points7 points  (0 children)

With most of these things, I used to not get angry at the fact that this existed as it did make sense, but that the fact that the literal reverse would be considered extremely sexist and the target of multiple women's rights campaigns.

Now, of course, it's all just another grain of sand on the beach of female solipsism (when it helps me, it's logical and understandable; when it hurts me, it's evil) and hypergamy evidence.

[–]1redpillbanana 56 points57 points  (5 children)

Technology has been magnifying the advantage of the 'winners' for quite some time now.

Thanks to the internet, famous men can build worldwide fan clubs and can easily set up a flight itinerary to visit every last member of their global harem.

Similarly, famous women can have armies of beta orbiters to give them all the money and validation that they desire, along with a select few alpha men for their sexual needs.

Technology is only serving to magnify our feral instincts. Prepare to see AF/BB on steroids in the coming years.

[–]RAGING_ERECTION 4 points5 points  (4 children)

I wouldn't be at all surprised if AF/BB will be enforced in the legal system at some point in the future.

Make it illegal for low SMV guys to even attempt to attract a woman, and only that top 1% alpha cock has legal access to every single woman.

The ultimate feminist utopia.

[–]VinylGuy420 11 points12 points  (1 child)

I'd say that's starting with all this "sexual assault" and drunken "rape" on college campuses. A woman gets hit on by a "creepy" guy and it makes her feel weird, that's sexual assault now. A woman gets drunk and makes a poor decision to sleep with a low SMV male then regrets it when's she's sober, that's rape.

If at all the guy is hawt, that nullifies all the above of course.

[–]Dark triad expert: - - [3 Points]IllimitableMan 402 points403 points x3 (122 children)

It's this assortative mating shit that leads to higher social/economic inequality as well. In the old days a breadwinner man married a woman who didn't earn shit and so wealth was somewhat evenly spread, that's how the middle class was born. Men in factories, women at home. Now women are out getting degrees, and education turned more into a business rather than an academic pursuit focused on the pursuit of knowledge and thus the value of education has devalued. To make things worse, all the manufacturing went abroad (how do you think China suddenly became the #2 economy? Everyone is getting chinese kids working for 20p an hour 18 hours a day to make their toys and electronics and shit.) Don't even get me started on student loan debts.

Due to hypergamy women REFUSE to date down, but they're "educated" in their nonsense degrees so they want men equally educated or better. People gloss over the details by saying "they got a masters or a bachelors or a PHD" but, for example, I wouldn't say a Masters in Business (something a career woman would have) is equal to say a Masters in fucking Physics. No way. Physics is way harder/more prestigious. Anyhow, what happens is they only date "top tier men" and what you get is couples who are either both individually wealthy/top professionals or a couple where neither person earns much. Rather than what we had before where one person was pretty independently wealthy and supported someone who wasn't. Thus the gap between rich and poor continues to widen and the middle class continues to erode. See, men will support women, but women won't support men. Men making good money on one income and supporting women is what built the middle class. You won't see many, if any, professional women who have a non-professional husband. And when it does happen, don't expect that shit to last. Don't expect that bitch to be happy as the breadwinner. Yeah she'll like the control/power she has but that is ultimately what will ruin the relationship. She will disrespect her man for being less economically successful than her, feminism be damned it doesn't change female nature.

Globalisation hasn't helped, but feminism is the real nail in the coffin in this shit. Less jobs, lower wages in real terms, so the average man finds it harder to make a wage and have a family. Boomers had life FAR EASIER and higher standard of living with more resources to improve themselves with ( They had less competition for jobs and dating. Now I know the instinctual response is "be in the top 20% then!" 1. that's easier said than done, and will take years for any young guy who gets this information young enough to make good of it, it won't "just happen." A lot of guys get overwhelmed by the reality and just succumb to depression. 2. not everyone can be in the top 20%, we're all in competition, if everyone improves then standards just go up and you don't actually reach the 20%. You end up being a well-educated, fit guy who's still poor as fuck and thus irrelevant because you don't have economic power. There will always be losers.

You have to be willing to do extreme shit to get successful these days because previous generations done fucked it up for the millennials. That's why millennials have massive narcissism issues and men are beginning to embrace fucked up ideals like the dark triad. Because "being normal and working hard" isn't enough to even have a fucking family anymore. And the majority of people aren't even born in functional families anymore so the desire to want to create one is even stronger. How ironically perverse. Your ability to create a family now is lower, but it's harder than it's ever been to do so. We're seeing a return to a two-class system and effectively "harems for guys who made it, nothing for everyone else" as an economic effect of institutionalised feminism combined with globalisation.

If you weren't born with a silver spoon in your mouth you need to be kind of a crazy cunt to get anywhere these days. Be willing to go to prison, take huge risks, fuck people over and get yours. It's sad it's come to this, I guess, but it's all part of the decline. I think it's sad your father or father's father who didn't have half your education or awareness of the world could run an entire house/car/boat on one manual labour job when guys now work their asses off, the bitches aren't interested in the average guy (only the TOP MEN) and they get paid less and cant afford the kind of independence that men of previous generations easily could. Now, without doing illegal shit, you have to be hyper intelligent or connected as fuck to make it. A lot of intelligence is wasted in the lower classes anyway as they never got a decent education. Fuck the system.

Fuck the hippie generation who left this shit pit of a legacy for today's young men and women. It fucks over women in the future who can't lock down a provider post-wall, but young men are feeling the pain RIGHT NOW. Young men also do not have the option of "locking down a provider" they can't fucking use their sexuality to leech onto someone who made it in the economy. They have to fucking make it or they're fucked AND NOBODY GIVES A FUCK ABOUT 'EM or will give 'em a leg up. Older guys who came up when shit was easier wanna hold onto that power/position/pussy and don't re-create the same opportunities they were afforded to the generation of men coming up. It's all closed-door, you're a family friend, or an autist with 150 IQ or you're not getting hired unless you're a good looking girl who'll suck dick for wages. I don't think the vast bulk of young men out there, we're talking 16-30 have ever had it as difficult. It was monumentally easier to make it at 16-30 2,3,4,5 decades ago. Equality is bullshit and we all know it here, if it wasn't young men could date up too, but they can't. Life's a bitch. Get yours. Aggressively work for it. Or this skewed system will shit all over you and leave you with nothing. Channel your anger and become great. /rant

Edit: typos and thanks for gold.

[–]neveragoodtime 134 points135 points  (33 children)

Face it, the baby boomer generation fucked up the system. They gave us 3rd wave feminism, latch key kids, no fault divorce, and unrepentant greed. And no, the Beatles don't make up for that shit.

Women won't date down, they're entitled and think Prince Charming is owed to them, if he exists or not, without work on their part. Men can fight back by only dating down. She has a degree? Fuck her and don't call her back. What's the point? TRP has already opened your eyes to these AWALT bitches. Find a girl who still lives at home, and works in retail with no degree. These are the only girls capable of appreciating what you offer them. Women will adapt when they realize their career didn't lead them to family or happiness. Look at the impractical shit girls wear to workout, they'll do anything to attract a man.

Instead, I assume this smart Stanford woman thinks the solution to their problem is to screen men more heavily. What, in her infinite wisdom does a 6" cock say about a man's ability to maintain a relationship? Nothing, and that's what these women will be left with when he takes his cock to a younger pussy, because he's pre screened, and girls are lining up for him in this app she just created.

And how are the women screened for these top guys? You're right, they aren't because grrl power. These "elite" guys will have no reason to stick around with these mediocre girls. I'm going to start my own app, virgin females only need apply.

[–]2Kill_Your_Ego 91 points92 points  (7 children)

Yes and there are many such girls working at malls waiting for you to come run game on them. Though AWALT still applies. At least they won't have artificially inflated their own perceived SMV with s useless masters degree in social work and $80,000 in debt to fund her six year ride of a thousand cocks.

[–]foldpak111 11 points12 points  (6 children)

Hilarious comment. I saved it.

[–]2Kill_Your_Ego 39 points40 points  (5 children)

I no longer find this funny. 96% of these women have destroyed their ability to be wives. They will die broke and alone. Or worse. Drag some BB down with them into their hell. I keep meeting them. They are miserable just as we are.

[–]Hasmond 17 points18 points  (3 children)

They will die broke and alone.

No they won't, the government will subsidize their debt. The government will do this either through raising taxes (which will prompt corporations to move their facilities to other countries) or print money to pay it off (which will devalue the USD and weaken the US financial position globally).

[–]2Kill_Your_Ego 4 points5 points  (2 children)

Yes this is true. Can't take some short term harm for actual real gains. "Think of the childrenz!" LOL. Gotta love liberalism.

Wish I could fast forward ten years. Can't though so plan accordingly. Sell your house and rent. Don't invest in the shell of America.

[–]stimulated_narcolept 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Not a left/right issue but a libertarian/authoritarian one.

[–]Kanyin 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Selling your house and renting isn't a good idea. Land is the only thing with actual value any more.

[–]foldpak111 20 points21 points  (6 children)

You can see this in action. Look at all the fatties in the crowd lusting over him. You can see written all over their faces that they truly think they deserve a man like that.

Note how she keeps pawing at him. You know you're high smv when a girls paws for your attention.

[–]1aguy01 41 points42 points  (0 children)

When you have enough SMV girls just say 'give me your number' and fuck you. This guys whole game is to just not be autistic, and his SMV does all the work. Women take one look at him and they instantly know that they should acquire his genes via insemination. He doesn't have to entertain her; she is actively looking to capitalize on the rare opportunity that is his seed. He gets the same treatment as a hot woman. He is the reason women think men and women are similar in dating; she pursues men, just like they pursue her! It's equal! Most women have no idea what an exception a guy like this is to the rule.

[–]garlicextract 17 points18 points  (1 child)

Guy like that can essentially pick whatever girl he wants to marry.

So he must have married a blonde bombshell but has to put up with bitching and entitlement for the rest of his life, right?

Nope, he married an Indonesian native, below him in the looks department, but likely very feminine with a desire to take care of her man

[–]DaegobahDan 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Wow it like you know this shit intellectually, but every time you see a new even more egregious example it just blows my mind.

[–]Baylien2 23 points24 points  (1 child)

Dude coulda had an orgy going in that room with the hot ones while the fatties masturbate in the corner

[–]GritsConQueso 2 points3 points  (1 child)

If a Boomer claims that they are responsible for the Beatles simply because they liked the Beatles, you should punch them in the face. Goddamn I hate Baby Boomers. They are the worst generation of humans by a long shot.

[–]Claude_Reborn[S] 8 points9 points  (9 children)

Face it, the baby boomer generation fucked up the system.

"who" fucked to the system is completely irrelevant. Aliens could have fucked up the system for all that it matters.

This is the system you live in and it isn't going to change. It has always been like that, and will always be like that.

So get good, or get the fuck out of the pool and become one of the MGTOW failure types.

[–]Jimmy_Big_Nuts 3 points4 points  (3 children)

If they fucked the system, that implies it wasn't fucked when they got the keys. I don't see why it can't be un-fucked. It's a problem, we should fix it. Doesn't have to take too much effort. Just don't vote for any conservative candidates (since they are the baby boomer vote), join the leftwing party, internally vote to neutralise the feminist element. Job done.

[–]Claude_Reborn[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don't see why it can't be un-fucked.

You can't un ring the bell when it comes to social change.

join the leftwing party, internally vote to neutralise the feminist element.

Except for every 1 of you there are, there are 5 beta pussies who will cut their own throats to appease women.

You need to remember that TRP is a VERY minority position, and everything is pretty much working against it.

Society is engineered to make life easier for women, always has been.

Left, right, doesn't matter, all sided will pander to women when pushed because women are the easiest voter to manipulate. Most women vote based on "feelings" not logic and as a group are the biggest swing voters.

[–]e_n_t_r_0_p_y 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Upvoted simply for the comments on the Beatles and female work out wear. Gave me a chuckle.

[–]Ventura613 56 points57 points  (2 children)

I think I completely agree with this rant. Very well put, it fucking sucks. I worked three years in an industry for shit pay & crappy fake promotions out of college. That company never gave me a chance to gain better placement, HR was an impossible road block with their rigid practices. I quit and took a job in sales which I always feared I might have to do. I fucking hate it and work long hours, but I know the only way to make real money is to sell on uncapped comission. You better fucking beleive I'm going to sell, I prob called half you mofo's already. Not only that but I volunteer to get experience in other fields so I can freelance. I have a side business, and I work out. I'm still poor as fuck with college debt and car payments. Girls don't give a fuck about the struggle. I'll be one cold ass fuck by the time I'm 35.

[–]Fryguy48 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Thats rough bro... im in a similar postion but im 21 and make jack shit.

[–]TheRedTrader 34 points35 points  (5 children)

It wouldn't be so bad if this assortative mating led to an increase in the amount of children born with good genes for our current world. The problem is once these power couples have formed they also seem to have less children than the lower classes, thus in the long term the system becomes even more increasingly unbalanced. Not only are the lower classes now not interbreeding with the higher classes but they are also spitting out children left right and center whilst the power couples are too busy nurturing their careers to give a shit about nurturing children.

You only have to have half a notion of future trends to see that this is not going to end well.

[–]NoRegretj 11 points12 points  (1 child)

Again, back to money they see no reason to have kids because, who the fuck wants to pay for all that shit considering how expensive it is now to raise children? Keep them away from very dumb trashy kids? Eventually pay for their college? No sane couple who makes a good bit of money wants to work their asses off to pay it ALL to their kids schooling, why have more than one?

Yet it's completely ass-backwards, the poor are the ones having the most kids and expecting governments to just pay for everything. And They are, because of corporations lobbyists knowing exactly how they will make their money off them, so now anyone can go to pretty much any school, no matter what money they currently possess because of loans. Including wonderful affirmative action giving an unfair advantage in both college admissions and internships. This is the banks just capitalizing on this need making BANK off the loans and interest, they're selling us out and we're fucked. Think they don't know what they're doing or how to fix it? Please, we're past that.

[–]omfalos 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Rich people have bad taste. Instead of spending their millions on houses, cars and boats, they should spend their millions on harems of wives and hundreds of children. That's the old-fashioned way. The rich must spare the rest of us the financial burden of perpetuating our society.

[–]Evolved_Red 69 points70 points  (31 children)

Its shit like this app, the unearned entitlement of women, that's quickly driving western civilisation to what had happened in Japan. 'Lower' class men, i.e. not in the 20%, i.e. almost everyone else of the male population, it's eventually going to get fed up with this shit and not even try worth women. Hell we've already got a MGTOW. Most men are not here in Trp, most will never know how to combat this paradigm.

Look to Japan folks. That's our future.

[–]vakerr 14 points15 points  (2 children)

Historically societies where young men had no future turned violent and warlike. Young women can always use sex to make a living. What young men can always use is violence, so that's what they turn to in the desperate attempt at success and reproduction. Plan accordingly.

[–]Bulldog44 2 points3 points  (1 child)

Exactly, and considering how well armed Americans are, holy shit guys. Shit might get very real very soon.

[–]Short-Guy 53 points54 points  (22 children)

The only problem is that the western world is very different from Japan. The Japanese people are raised to be blindly obedient. We allow immigrants from 3rd world countries who are connected to crime. We will never become Japan. Instead, We will probably see organizations like ISIS continue to grow and even see them gain lands in places such as Africa and Europe. Even worse, we could see a surge of violence as the 80% continue to lose both jobs and family. The conditions are setting up for another world war. Expect to see a real rape culture within a couple of decades

[–]csmass 59 points60 points  (10 children)

I see a revolt in the future, and rightfully so. You can't sell your children and grandchildren out without paying for it somehow. Personally, I hope a majority of the baby fuckers die soon. I hate most of them with a passion. Everyone with half a brain knows they sold us out, and half of the POS's blew all their money on stupid shit and are now broke still working. Still working! What the fuck...? Worthless POS generation that was the true coddled generation.

[–]djvita 8 points9 points  (9 children)

ah most baby boomers are 70 give it 20 years for most to pass then our parents will inherit, and the cycle will continue, they already cut pensions for their children. i doubt in 2050 there will be 9B people, half the population is above 40, they are not all gonna live to 80--90 and wisely most of us will not have not even two children so replacement pop will not be possible.

this next decade willl suck but once millenials reach 35-40 to positions of power in politics, biz etc we may turn it around and call off the debts grandpa made us carry.

[–]vakerr 5 points6 points  (1 child)

half the population is above 40

Only in the west, which is the target of mass immigration by unskilled people from violent societies.

[–]csmass 9 points10 points  (5 children)

I am having my doubts. The reason being, we have too many women in power. Women have no clue how to run things, and most men in my generation are just a shell of a boy. They are not capable of running a country and bringing back the strength of this nation (USA). Combine that with the fact the Generation X'ers are doing the same shit the boomers did, and we have a small chance of digging out of this mess without a revolt. Not that I don't want to believe in my generation, but a group of people where a majority of its women are whores, degenerates, and ignorant of their own biology is not a group I would want to run things. It's not even a group I would want around me, and this is just the women!

[–]GreatWhite_Buffalo 9 points10 points  (4 children) you really think that the men in power in the US are doing a good job?

[–]ShekelBanker 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I just hope Hillary won't be voted in, or else the decline speeds up a thousand-fold. As much as I am sadistic to see it happen, first of all I am reluctant to see it happen to others who are RP, then to me, we'll all get equally fucked as men.

[–]Evolved_Red 8 points9 points  (3 children)

I'm talking about the attempted desexualisation of the 'normal' man, not talking about the state of the union.

[–]Short-Guy 23 points24 points  (2 children)

Men will never be desexualized no matter what feminists do. Even in Japan, prostitution is common and organized criminals such as the yakuza make millions trafficking girls into Japan.

[–]SpeakNoTruths 9 points10 points  (0 children)

"... the withering away if the state may be one thing, [but] the withering away of the penis [is] quite another." Christopher Hitchens

[–]drallcom3 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Once technology can sufficiently take care of our sexual needs, society will change dramatically. It has already started with the high speed internet (porn).

[–]myexile 12 points13 points  (2 children)

"Due to hypergamy women REFUSE to date down, but they're "educated" in their nonsense degrees so they want men equally educated or better."

And if you look at her app screenshots in that article, they just list what school. I would rather know what they studied, and then from where they studied it.

[–]Dark triad expert: - - [3 Points]IllimitableMan 29 points30 points  (1 child)

The app leans significantly towards fulfilling female preferences anyway. Majority of men don't give a fuck if she's educated, they just want someone innocent/sweet and attractive. This "elite" shit complements hypergamy/women's status chasing nicely. Yeah sure some guys wanna power couple it up for political reasons, but the bulk of men would happily marry down if the woman was pleasant enough.

It's women who will want this app the most as it's they who want to marry up/across and the webpage says the app has slightly more women than men on it, I won't be surprised if that trend keeps up. A lot of men who have been burned more than a few times know career women tend to be cunts. Especially those who went to top schools and shit. Fully on that "I'm an independent women I don't need no man but I want one that's better than me anyway bullshit." It's been said here before, the more a woman educates herself the smaller the pool of men she is capable of being attracted to becomes. A lot of career women end up alone, they are, after all, getting more college places, graduating more, and getting hired easier/in record numbers due to affirmative action and shit. Some even say they're graded less harshly too. I'm not sure about that. But I'm not sure all this female prosperity is organic, more like socially engineered.

[–]ProductivityMonster 6 points7 points  (0 children)

She does have a solid business idea. Cater to the women on a dating app and the men will come, even if she has to filter out most of the men based on wealth/education.

[–]Newdist2 21 points22 points  (2 children)

assortative mating shit

Assortative mating is fine. The problem is when you combine it with unrestricted female hypergamy in a system where women don't need male providers.

[–]garlicextract 2 points3 points  (1 child)

The problem is when you combine it with unrestricted female hypergamy in a system where women don't need male providers.

They do need a provider; they just don't need to be faithful since modern technology and society allows for easy cover-ups

[–]Newdist2 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Government is the provider.

[–]fastball21 17 points18 points  (9 children)

I-Man, I hold you with high regard, but there's a few things at play here that you're missing. The middle-class is essentially a 20th Century baby, and it's a by-product of the two world wars. Two wars which removed millions of men from the global labour pool in successive generations; the Second World War doing the added favour of removing two industrial power houses (Germany and Japan) from global markets for a considerable time. Not only were they removed as competition, but massive amounts of labour and materials were required to rebuild them from the ground up.

The North American worker had a good generation and a half of almost global monopoly conditions for industrial production. This was reflected with the high and stable wages a man could earn, as his value went through the roof. Hence one income could support a wife, a brood and their own personal home. That monopoly has been gone for the last 30 years, and the U.S. labour market, national infrastructure conditions and debt levels have reflected those changes.

This monopoly window is what allowed feminism to truly unfurl its wings, as the need (and expectation) for a working wife as per pre-WWI was no longer necessary. This monopoly window is also what triggered the "hippie" culture in the '60s. It was the children raised in this labour vacuum acting in the same way as the feminists. That window is now gone, and instead of having invested that tremendous head start into true global leadership and innovation, it's been squandered. Massive national debts have been accumulated throughout Western countries in the past 30 years trying to maintain that wealth monopoly. In truth, what's left are the socially coddled fighting over the ever dwindling supply of musical chairs.

It is harder for young men today compared to 50 years ago. Men absorb the pain first in order to protect the women, as they have always done. But they can't and won't do this forever. When that pain works it way through the system to include both genders (as it's starting to) the social outcome will be an almost unrecognizable structure compared to our own childhoods. Imagine an isolated village in ancient times, suffering through starvation conditions. Stage 1 is the adults will cut off food to the children, knowing they can breed again when conditions improve. If conditions don't improve, Stage 2 is the men will abandon the women in order to save themselves, knowing their odds for survival are better when providing for just one person instead of two. Ask yourself if this behaviour sounds familiar in any way with social conditions we see brewing today.

[–]Fryguy48 7 points8 points  (7 children)

Tell me more, im very interested

[–]fastball21 3 points4 points  (4 children)

money = collectible time and energy. Every dollar that exists represents a unit of labour that was performed to create it. Accumulated wealth is a depository of past production, and the more you have, the more you can purchase current or future labour production.

Every political "ism" that is, has been and shall be: feminism, socialism, marxism, totalitarianism… are just footpaths leading us to the fields where we hunt currency. The key is the labour pool (men), the size of the pool determines its value. Whoever controls the behaviour of men, controls their value and gains access to a cut of their productivity.

[–]foldpak111 6 points7 points  (1 child)

Damn straight. That's why if things financially don't work out legally, I'll do it illegally. I'm going to make it, or I'll die trying.

[–]Baylien2 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Real shit mah nigga....get paid mah nigga

[–]Baylien2 6 points7 points  (1 child)

I think this comment deserves its own thread.

[–]isthatyourdaughter 8 points9 points  (9 children)

Yeah, as much as I respect you IM, I see a much simpler endgame to all of this- a mass return to the philosophy of "keeping the women in line" if you know what I mean

Let's face it, some forms of physical dominance are pretty hard for a woman to deny

[–]Dark triad expert: - - [3 Points]IllimitableMan 31 points32 points  (6 children)

I see where you're coming from but I don't see a snowballs chance in hell of feminist legislation getting repealed. As for the social anarchy, would the effeminate bitch men of today be able to stand up to all the squawking harpies losing their collective shit? I suspect not. Men aren't collectively strong enough anymore to "put women in their natural place" as it were. But what can you expect when they're all raised by single mothers and there's fucking xenoestrogens in everything? Most men are divorced of their manliness and hence not "men" in the truest meaning of the word.

[–]Short-Guy 26 points27 points  (1 child)

If men in the western world are now weak, then immigrants from other countries will pour in and end feminism the old fashioned way. Do you think feminism can win against radical muslims or the drug cartels?

[–]truthiesttruth 4 points5 points  (2 children)

I agree with everything you said but dont agree with your pessimism about the future and the exact degree to which men must overachieve in order to find a wife.

Theres no fucking excuse. There will always be poor women looking to marry up and sideways economically, you dont have to be ultra rich.

Get all the pussy you want till 35, marry the youngest woman you can find, come to terms with awalt and the fact that she probably still jumped 10+ dicks, marry her anyways because you chose her for her ability to raise children (alone), and keep plates.

Divorce rape? Marry poor enough/get a good prenup and you should be fine.

What is so bad about this future?

Its the fucking 60s all over!

[–]RU_Crazy 4 points5 points  (1 child)

The future is grim. Both economically and socially. The same 80/20 split being discussed here when it comes to dating prospects is happening when it comes to income. The middle class is dying. At some point you have to accept we are in the decline phase in the revolution ---> incline ---> golden era ---> decline ---> revolution societal cycle.

[–]tedted8888 2 points3 points  (3 children)

IDK man, sure theres gonna be good looking guys which are great on tinder, but picking up a woman in real life? Thats a whole diffrent skillset. What man of value wants a tramp who rides the CC from guy to guy on online sites? Honestly I really think to get into the top 20% of men is just having standards and not caving. How many men do you know who are willing to walk away from a girl?

[–]1Modified_Hackware 5 points6 points  (0 children)

It fucks over women in the future who can't lock down a provider post-wall...

Which is precious few when we get down to it really. They'll always find a willing low value Beta to pay for their shit which exacerbates the problem.

[–]the_red_scimitar 4 points5 points  (2 children)

A great post, but you are repeating some worn tropes that are incorrect about American manufacturing. "All" of it did not "go to china". See the Wiki article, which states:

"The United States is the world's second largest manufacturer, with a 2010 industrial output of approximately $1,696.7 billion.[2] In 2008, its manufacturing output was greater than that of the manufacturing output of China and India combined, despite manufacturing being a very small portion of the entire U.S economy, as compared to most other countries.

If the top 500 U.S.-based manufacturing firms were counted as a separate country, their total revenue would rank as the world’s third’s largest economy."

That section has good citations as well.

Also, we're now seeing China move some manufacturing to the US:

And the most recent data is very strong about US manufacturing:

Best to be up to date about such things. This doesn't mean jobs for everyone, by any means, especially as more and more of the economy is now service and IT oriented.

[–]leaftreeforest 3 points4 points  (0 children)

While it's an interesting proposition to pin the growing income inequality on feminism, I think it makes far and away more sense it's corporate influence on politics, and policies implemented by the wealthy to cater to the wealthy that has created such inequality. In addition to natural pro-monopoly trends, that is, if you're a successful company, it is easier to maintain and grow your success while knocking out less successful (smaller) competitors. Add to this restrictive regulations killing or keeping competitors out, and loopholes in our tax code and regulation of finance (which has gotten better). And then similar to how successful businesses find it easier to become even more successful, it is also easier for successful couples and families to keep growing their success and ensuring their children's success. Enrolling their kids in private schools, ensuring that they go to a top-tier college, and instilling in them the proper behavior and values, as well as connections, all lead to the rich staying rich. On the other side, the poor have to deal with their crime-ridden neighborhoods, drug laws that punish poor and minorities disproportionately, and the struggle to just make ends meet, instead of getting a good education to pave the way for a high-paying job.

And there are a ton of other reasons. The disappearance of manufacturing jobs and union jobs means it's tougher to find a well-paying job without a good STEM degree. Potentially corroding effects of welfare policies. The top executives siphoning away the profits away from the workers.

This seems like a more convincing reason for the growing wealth gap than feminism. It also aligns with how many countries that are experiencing high economic inequality also have terrible gender equality (China, Argentina). And how some countries with lower levels of economic inequality still have pretty progressive scores on gender equality (Scandinavian countries).

[–]petricakerempuh 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What people fail to realize is that nobody "fucked" the system. It would've happened either way, regardless of what generation was in place. Society simply changed to optimize for the female sexual selection, dismantling nuclear family, religious ties and the moral fabric which kept hypergamy in check to optimize for other features. The woman in the article today indeed has a better choice to select her mates. Evolution doesn't give a shit about butthurt males unable to raise happy families and relive the lives of their parents. This is an inevitability. This happened for the better part of our species history. The cultural chains that we perceive as as "moral" protected against female hypergamy in favor of cultural strength and were able to harness the productive power of betas (who otherwise wouldn't have to compete for women) in order to defeat other civilizations. Now there are no more wars between civilizations, nations and culture, and that very fabric which give the West the competitive advantage is being torn to shreds. The same thing will happen to every other society. World peace will inevitably lead to the destruction of nuclear family, and the degradation of the evolutionary imperative from civilizational superiority to the female sexual choice. Yeah it's fucked up, but at least we have freedom now.

Another thing to note is that this is cyclical. The social degradation will strengthen divides along ideological, religious and tribal lines, causing more large-scale conflicts which will int turn strengthen the fabric of society to compete with other ideologies, religions, nations etc. You can see it today already - the most "progressive" country in the world Sweden is the global leader in per capita ISIS jihadists. And the sharia is very, very anti-hypergamy. When the survival of the group is at stake, nobody gives a shit about the female preference for mates.

[–]Azora 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That all sounds a lot like what's happening with the young men in japan.

[–]useyourmouth 70 points71 points  (3 children)

lol...her vacant smile and soulless eyes say it all. she feasted through college and now seeks to harness technology to filter out more of that tasty alpha cock.

[–]frequentlywrong 23 points24 points  (0 children)

Now thats a thousand cock stare.

[–]Bulldog44 23 points24 points  (0 children)

Let her have it, really this sort of thing does men a favor, those with a brain in their head looking for a quality woman should know that a woman on tinder or this sort of app is just simply not good for anything but fuckin and chuckin.

[–]Pointless_Endeavors 28 points29 points  (21 children)

all have been carefully selected by Bradford’s team and an are-you-cool-enough algorithm

There's no algorithm. It's her and her team looking for alphas. It's alpha's and (clearly) wealthy beta's only.

All other singles have to wait in a virtual line and hope they’re top-notch enough to join

All women can join.

[–]putsch80 56 points57 points  (9 children)

All women can join.

Awesome. Hope it fills up with those 260 lb 5'6" BBWs that are looking for a "REAL MAN".

[–]sociosexualstatus 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Holy shit haha I can't fucking stop laughing you made my day God dammit

[–]t21spectre 9 points10 points  (0 children)

It will be. Eventually they will filter them out.

I really don't see this app lasting very long, just another tinder knockoff. It also will have gold-digger written all over it. The high status men deemed worthy will use it for fuck and chucks just like tinder and other dating websites.

[–]foldpak111 2 points3 points  (6 children)

[–]Hughtub 5 points6 points  (2 children)

He has all of that potential (perfect frame and looks) and throws it away on some ordinary looking asian woman! Haha. I wouldn't trade places with his situation for anything. He failed. Utterly failed.

Them shopping

[–]foldpak111 3 points4 points  (1 child)

The guy is 10/10 in looks no homo. In lost he's got that Daniel Craig sexy rugged look, then that interview he's a straight up model. All that potential.

[–]Steve_Wiener 2 points3 points  (2 children)

That clip deserves a TRP case study/thread.

[–]foldpak111 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Let's do it then. Ask an endorsed member or a long time poster to do a case study. I grew up with Lost so i'd geek out on it haha

[–]1Zanford 14 points15 points  (1 child)

Agreed. Especially if it's run by a woman with a sales and MBA background, the app is unlikely to be very technically sophisticated (even tho she has some beta programmers keeping it running; I doubt this gal wrote a single line of its source code). They way it probably works is as follows:

  • Basically any woman can get on as long as her profile mentions a college degree

  • When men try to join, their application will be swipe left/right'ed by some of the women. If not enough of the first 100 swipe right, the guy is deleted.

So basically it will be the same as Tinder except it will make most guys drop out faster. Which is actually not a terrible thing; they will save time, and the alphas (and their harems) will be able to use it more efficiently.

In theory I don't think the app is so terrible an idea (as morally hypocritical as it may be). However it will not succeed, but it will not get the details right, and it has incompetent leadership: a bangable young-ish woman with zero technical skills who will end up sucking a few VC cocks, both literally and metaphorically, before giving up and becoming the trophy wife of some Silicon Valley middle manager.

[–]ioncloud9 7 points8 points  (6 children)

I love it when 2s, 3s, and 4s think they deserve 7s, 8s, and 9s.

[–]studiov34 23 points24 points  (1 child)

In San Francisco, another definition for a 49er is a woman who is a 4 and thinks she's a 9.

[–]Bulldog44 1 point2 points  (2 children)

Make sure to shame the next faggot you see with one of those 2's, 3's and 4s then, because they're perpetuating that shit.

On second thought, leave em to it.

[–]dakkr 0 points1 point  (1 child)

There's no algorithm. It's her and her team looking for alphas.

Even if there was an algorithm, all you do is lie and you get around it. What's to stop me saying i'm 6'5" with a 14 inch dick, a 7 figure salary, 4 olympic gold medals, and a nobel peace prize?

[–]Bocaj6487 20 points21 points  (2 children)

Tinder already filters out the bottom 80%

[–]whatisinausername_ 17 points18 points  (4 children)

This will fail.

It's girls looking for their beta bux.

This is an app that the Ivy, or at least a top tier college, educated woman can, after having already rode the cock carousel, pick and choose a beta suitor with money and status.

Just because someone ends up with a high level career doesn't mean that they're alpha. How many girls out there would fuck a known felon as long as he gave that gina some tingles? Most of 'em, that's who.

I was pissed about this at first, but after reading the article I know it won't work.

Girls are telling the app what they think they want, but we all know that what they say they want isn't what they actually want.

Yeah, some people may end up getting married off this, but they'll end up divorced after the chick has her kids and secures beta bucks' cash.

Ain't worried.


From the article

Bradford, who worked at Salesforce, attended Stanford Graduate school and interned with top venture capital firm Sequoia Capital, was only hoping to raise $US750,000. But she found a number of angel investors — including five of her professors at Stanford — were eager to invest.

Thirsty, thirsty betas. Fucking appalling. They weren't eager to invest, they were eager to buy their way into her pussy, or if they're women, they must be in serious need of a beta bux.

[–]5pecial 12 points13 points  (3 children)

I went to Harvard and make a shitload of money. I would never use this app... From my experience, down-to-earth state school grads are much better dating material.

[–]Ebenezer_Wurstphal 9 points10 points  (2 children)

Harvard grad here too. I see no reason to compete in a smaller, ostensibly more competitive, pool when the tuna fish all look the same in both places.

[–]foldpak111 18 points19 points  (0 children)

High school drop out checking in

[–]FourLokoKills 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Another Harvard grad here -- it seems that we have quite a few in this sub. I don't see a reason to use this app either. Why make it more difficult for myself?

[–]1Watermelon_Salesman 20 points21 points  (14 children)

Soon to come: a dating app that only allows males with cocks bigger than 7".

[–]exthemius 29 points30 points  (2 children)

Or perhaps a 6's app where you can filter based on the three 6's: 6 or more feet in height, 6" or more penis or 6 or more figure salary.

[–]ringostardestroyer 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I was thinking about this. Having all three 6s guarantees you a 6/10 at least.

[–]16 Endorsed ContributorGayLubeOil 14 points15 points  (4 children)

You realize that some of these seven inch cocks are attached to fat nerds and undatable men?

[–]1kick6 2 points3 points  (0 children)

But 3" is covered up by a fat pad.

[–]1Watermelon_Salesman 16 points17 points  (1 child)

That's not what feminism is about.

They don't necessarily care about finding dateable men. They want to shame and humiliate men in every possible way they can

[–]tedted8888 2 points3 points  (3 children)

Smaller markets mean less costumers... It will fizzle out.

[–]Hughtub 1 point2 points  (1 child)

Doubt it. The demand for high quality never ceases.

[–]tedted8888 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I cant find it but a while back someone had a "top 10 hottest women on okcupid" or something like that. About 5 were hot and few were fattie SJW types. A site like this is going to attract the fat SJW type women. All the "hot" women will still have no trouble attracting men in real life and online. In fact the'll probably be meeting higher quality men IRL than online. Site will die because of the volume of low quality women.

[–]TK-85 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Facebook would be dead today if they didn't make the smart decision to not be college only.

[–]1Zanford 8 points9 points  (2 children)

"The app has paired 20,000 people, resulting in 19 couples."

So less than 1 in 500 matches leads to a 'couple'? So it's either crappy, or is just useful for ONSes. Like Tinder.

What will happen is guys will learn how to game the app by creating (fake) Facebook profiles (as many already do for Tinder) that claim they went to an Ivy school where they were on the crew team, and now work at some Fortune 500 company, and enjoy yatching.

The men on the app will be a mix of savvy, hot harem-keeper guys (like on Tinder but with higher IQs and more social-media engineering) and wealthy betas who get used by aforementioned harem-girls for free dinners.

[–]1FatStig 3 points4 points  (0 children)

500 sluts for every >5% male...

[–]Nerf_Circus 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The thing is these are the types of men that don't need a dating app. They have women the only couples are BB's who don't have a social life.

[–]MGTOW_player 7 points8 points  (5 children)

The karma will be repaid...infinitely...when viable sex robots/VR technology is released.

Females are about to have a much harder time than men in life when that day comes.

[–]thepillwastaken 5 points6 points  (1 child)

I wouldn't sit around waiting for that day. It could be a while, if ever and you will miss out on a lot.

[–]Matsew 9 points10 points  (0 children)

This will be a Alpha male's dream because you'll have hoards of young women trying to lock you down via this app.

or hoards of post wall career cunts trying to lock you down via this app depending on how it turns out;D

[–]Brzinajbrzi 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Of course, it's made for iOS.

[–]Zachar1a 12 points13 points  (0 children)

This will fail, because their criteria for selecting men will just be what women say they are attracted to, not what they are really attracted to. I can already imagine a bunch of women sitting around a conference table, describing to each other the perfect Blue Pill nice guy.

[–]AlchemyPhoenix 8 points9 points  (7 children)

I think other sites do this already. When I signed up for OK Cupid in the new city I moved to last year, at first I was completely unimpressed. I was thinking I'd have to hit the bar scene to meet anyone. But I eventually teased out a few decent women in my own searches, plus got some unsolicited messages. Now suddenly I only see hot women when I log in. I swear they have some sort of snowball algorithm to protect hot girls from boring losers. It's like you have to prove yourself by getting a few messages before you gain access to the bonus echelon.

[–]whatisinausername_ 3 points4 points  (4 children)

They do.

I got an email from OKC after a few people "chose me" in their quick match section that said I was attractive enough so were going to start showing you more attractive people.

[–]MomoUnchained 2 points3 points  (1 child)

LOL. That's a marketing ploy dude.

Everyone gets that e-mail after a few days.

[–]1FatStig 2 points3 points  (1 child)

I got the same thing. When I started insulting all the feminist ham planets I got shadowbanned.

[–]whatisinausername_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Apparently it's a marketing thing. I was unaware, though. Joke was on us.

[–]useyourmouth 7 points8 points  (1 child)

So they filter on the front end, to make sure only elite get in...but do they then ever cull the flock of aged hens?

[–]JohnGalt316 5 points6 points  (0 children)

you guys need to calm your beards. no alphas are going to pick these women over what they normally get.

lost it at the example "senior designer at slate." no guy with options is going to pick these girls.

every top tier guy knows a ton of girls like these. they come from wealthy families, but didn't do shit with their opportunities.

if i wanted a girl like them, i don't need an app to get them. trust me, there is plenty of this kind of matchmaking going around in charity dinners.

[–]slcjosh 15 points16 points  (3 children)

If men tried this, can you imagine the backlash?

[–]mercuryg 3 points4 points  (0 children)

As Rollo says it, anything that increases a womans sexual selection capacity in search of the highest value mate possible will be encouraged, anything that represses it will be violently shut down.

Things will only get worse for your below 80% smv male.

[–]mykonos_rm 3 points4 points  (0 children)

didn't they try this with

[–]cruyff8 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I'm actually pretty intimately involved with this particular app. If anyone wants tips on getting in and gaming it, let me know.

[–]1knitro 29 points30 points  (6 children)

This is absurdly alarmist - I see illimitable wall of bitter text has already spit his hot take.

This will be a Alpha male's dream because you'll have hoards of young women trying to lock you down via this app.

Newsflash, this is what life is like. No technology will change, mitigate or undo reality. OP is mad at the way things are, as if righteous anger alone will change things. Still further to go, for you.

The supposition here is that they achieve their goal:

The goal is to make a more selective Tinder that’s only for the most interesting, motivated single people in cities around the world.

And here's why this doesn't matter - it needs buy in.

The real audience for this is women with over-inflated opinions of themselves (yes, that's most of them). Normal Tinder works just fine for dudes that all women want, so does going to a bar, or walking down the street. They don't need specialized apps. Wall-approaching or post-wall women who think they can still cash out a winner do. It's a female attempt to reduce the noise and increase the signal. It'll fail because there's no draw for men, especially those it wants. Will it get some? sure, but never the critical mass it needs to succeed.

You are going to see more and more apps for women that allow for more and stricter filtering out of low SMV men.

They can already do this, no new algorithm needed. I don't know why it's bad either - trp is about improving value, not wallowing at the bottom. If you are a 4 and doing nothing to improve, you don't deserve a 10.

Online dating in all forms has always been to women, the choosers, advantage. No dude worth his salt is going to jump through the hoops something like this presents and it will ultimately fail.

Please debunch panties.

[–]OurMindsLiveOn 17 points18 points  (2 children)

2 quick things...

  1. you are correct, there seems to be no incentive for high quality males to join onto this app, and it will probably be trashed, forever lost.

  2. Calling other dudes bitter, is what women do.

[–]1knitro 6 points7 points  (1 child)

re: 2 - maybe so, but bitter is bitter I'm not misusing the word. The guy is viewed as some sort of a authority but has a whiny, life's unfair and I'm angry about it tone to his prodigious contributions.

[–]JayViceroy 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I thought the same exact thing. Yet you are being downvoted. No one man has all the answers. TRP God does not exist.

[–]ProductivityMonster 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Wall-approaching or post-wall women who think they can still cash out a winner do. It's a female attempt to reduce the noise and increase the signal. It'll fail because there's no draw for men, especially those it wants. Will it get some? sure, but never the critical mass it needs to succeed.

don't forget about gold-diggers! Maybe consider the time constraints many rich BB are under...many work like animals and don't have the natural attractiveness to pick up quality women easily/quickly enough. If it speeds up the process or increases the supply of women for them significantly, it may be worth it to them. Maybe it gives BB the chance to feel like an alpha since they are part of a preselected group? So maybe the target audience is wall-approaching women and BB men (marketed to feel Alpha for being prescreened "elite").

[–]aptway 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I wouldn't want to be selected for only my money. Then you get pathetic duty sex. Fuck that.

[–]MagicJuggler 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Reminds me a bit about how Luxy had caused a splash with "Online dating - without the poor people!".

It's going to be hilarious seeing what workarounds exist to game the system.

[–][deleted]  (1 child)


    [–]RojoEscarlata 3 points4 points  (0 children)

    Since November, the app has paired 20,000 people, resulting in 19 couples.


    Bitches cannot even into math. That's way below that a 1% of the people who got matched actually got together as a couple (whatever the criteria of couple is)

    This taking into account that this is “curated"as that cunt calls it, and the only requirement for a woman to enter is pretty much having a vagina will create a huge disparity in numbers.

    It'll be fun seeing it crash and burn.

    [–]clear-sight 2 points3 points  (0 children)

    Women are the worst at pimping inequality, and blame men for the world's woes. In the UK the woman credited for getting women the vote only wanted it for the female rich elite, not all women. That is conveniently forgotten by feminists. This shit doesn't surprise me. What more forgotten by them is the majority of non-land owning men didn't have the vote either.

    With regard to this app there is a well worn story:

    "A man asks a woman if she would be willing to sleep with him if he pays her an exorbitant sum. She replies affirmatively. He then names a paltry amount and asks if she would still be willing to sleep with him for the revised fee. The woman is greatly offended and replies as follows:

    She: What kind of woman do you think I am?

    He: We’ve already established that. Now we’re just haggling over the price."

    [–]UnamusedPunk 6 points7 points  (0 children)

    Don't prescribe to social media. You will always have the upper hand as a male if you just go up to the girls you want in public and seduce them.

    edit: Furthermore, I don't have the space mentally to worry about taking picture of every damn thing I do thats cool, nor the time to worry about posting it online in a way that's appealing. Do you think Steve Job's needed this app or had an instagram? fuck no and I don't think he every would.

    [–]monsieurhire2 2 points3 points  (1 child)

    My favorite part is: "No Randoms!" Lolz, because totes hate the randoms!

    [–]Claude_Reborn[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

    on one we haven't vetted first ! We need to make sure that they have social proof before we'll let them in!

    You'll just end up with the normal "10 women sharing 1 alpha cock" or "he must be worth $X amount, so we can get dem beta bux!"

    [–]DaphneDK 2 points3 points  (0 children)

    There are already several such services. Amazing that they can raise that amount of money for an old concept.; There's also such a "elite" service where women with long education come to seek out men with a similar high education. Men in general just don't put the same emphasis on the educational level of partners, so it's rather loopsided. Thing is, what other people consider elite is no guarantee you find elite.

    [–]pl231 2 points3 points  (0 children)

    Who would partake in this though? Like why do I give a fuck if a chick is accomplished. I don't get tingles from her curing cancer or starting her own company. I get a boner from her being hot, being a good cook, giving good BJs and doing shit around the house. Career chicks are generally pretty shitty for all of those things, seeing as they have, a career.

    That's what I don't get about these dudes that care about the status of women so much, it's like being gay in a way. I want to fuck a chick, not another dude who does all the same shit as me (making money, etc). I don't think less of the chick if she only has a HS diploma, if she can fuck, cook and clean she's going to be higher on my list than some PhD who does nothing around the house.

    [–]averageredditor123 2 points3 points  (0 children)

    It's all relative to environment, so instead of a girl skipping through 100 losers to find one awesome guy, she's just gonna skip through 100 awesome guys to find one really awesome guy.

    [–]maximus_gladiator 4 points5 points  (1 child)

    Let be honest... this app will probably go nowhere if it was strictly coded by women lol.

    [–]Venicedreaming 1 point2 points  (14 children)

    So basically women are winning this game, and there's not much to be done about it for most males.

    [–]1FatStig 1 point2 points  (0 children)

    They consume much better than men. They will always be catered to by corporations.

    [–]cock_pussy_up 2 points3 points  (1 child)

    Women aren't winning. Having overbearing expectations isn't winning. The truth is, a lot of these overdemanding women will end up getting pumped and dumped by top players, single spinsters with a herd of cats, or married/divorced to a beta who they hate for not living up to their massive entitlements.

    [–]1cover20 1 point2 points  (1 child)

    How are "women winning"? One woman has started a company. She's winning.

    She's not on team woman. There is not team woman! She is on team herself, like every other woman is. She's not doing this for "women" and she'll be quite happy to dump other women off the list, in the most cruel junior high school manner possible. Think of "mean girls".

    Whereas she will probably be more straightforward to guys. She won't accept all of them but she intrinsically wants to like them.

    [–]e_n_t_r_0_p_y 1 point2 points  (1 child)

    Cannot agree more with your edit. Seriously, get your shit together. Put in a minimal amount of work and you'll outdo the vast the majority of the planet who are merely existing.

    [–]foldpak111 5 points6 points  (0 children)

    I had class today and just walking around campus exposed me to how mediocre the average guy is. Got motherfuckers walking around in xl t shirts, oversized khakis, DC court shoes and fucked up skin. A couple alpha's here and there but the competition is seriously scarce.

    [–]RP_on_TV 1 point2 points  (1 child)

    It's an app for preselection.

    Yeah man, my first reaction was not whining.

    It was "fuck yeah! I got a cool job, I lift and am always trying to improve, I got panty-dropping talents I practice at, and am slowly raising my SMV every day. This could work."

    [–]tsotha 1 point2 points  (2 children)

    I don't see the big deal. Women are already eliminating 80% of the guys on Tinder. This just allows them to be a little more efficient.

    [–]Waldo00 1 point2 points  (0 children)

    The only thing that'll happen is entitled bitches will be even more pissed when they get used for sex by top tier alphas and betas will continue to be mercilessly used.

    [–]BlackHeart89 1 point2 points  (0 children)

    This won't really ruin the game for anyone. The roles in the dating apps will be reversed. The men will become very picky because so many women will go after them. They won't take anything under a 7. Most probably won't take anything lower than an 8.

    It may even level out the playing field. Who knows.

    Also, plenty of women believe that men on apps only want to fuck. Women enjoy fucking as well. But they primarily want someone to commit to them. If she's on an app, she's down to just fuck. But many won't even remain on the app for a week before deleting it. Even if thats not the case, a lot of women are just uncomfortable with meeting people online.

    No concern coming from me.

    [–]HamstersUnited 1 point2 points  (0 children)

    The League, which just raised a $US2.1 million seed round, is operating with 4,500 beta users in San Francisco.

    An app for career girls to find highly educated and successful men... being tested in the male version of dating hell known as San Francisco.

    "Beta users" indeed, lmao. Should rename it to iCuck.

    [–][deleted]  (2 children)


      [–]1kick6 1 point2 points  (1 child)

      you must be doing the utterly wrong shit if the list of shit you need to do doesn't also increase your SMV. What are you doing, playing 16 hours of WoW a day?

      [–]the_red_scimitar 1 point2 points  (0 children)

      I totally agree with OP's edit about whining. Add to this the "open hypergamy" that Rollo now writes about frequently, and the whole stigma of AF/BB is being dropped by women as they openly claim the right to do exactly that. And, frankly, I don't see a problem with it.

      I've been online dating for maybe 4 years, and literally have read (and I do mean read) maybe 4000 or more women's profiles. They often express all the tropes that TRP has for women - older, out of shape ones thinking they are entitled to fit, handsome, well-off, romantic stable, successful, funny, dynamic and active men.

      But this goes two ways. The men they allow in will NOT be interested in the majority of the women who feel so entitled. Why would such a man not go for the young women? Answer: he will. And once this site goes up, give it a year before women start leaving in droves to find men who aren't totally out of their league, as most of the men on this site will be.

      Alternately, to save it from collapse, the site will start lowering the bar, until it is meaningless, because such men don't really need those sites, except for low-effort hook-ups - if such men even care for that.

      [–]dsldragon 1 point2 points  (0 children)

      hack her dating site so she and her prissy friends are constantly set up on dates with Ralph the angry trashman and his crew of malcontents

      [–]OblongShlong 0 points1 point  (3 children)

      Yet another whine thread. Get better or go to sleep with a dry dick.

      [–]1cover20 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      So when will we know enough about their coolness / balance algorithm to reverse engineer it?

      [–]YaBoiTibzz 0 points1 point  (6 children)

      Does it filter out low SMV women too though? Or is it only discriminatory in which men are allowed to use it? Because if it goes both ways then you could argue it might actually be a step forward in the sense of getting women to have more realistic expectations (i.e. a 6 getting denied from use of this app would be getting a reality check on what her SMV really is, whereas currently she expects access to 8's or 9's and probably considers herself one as a result).

      [–]Claude_Reborn[S] 2 points3 points  (3 children)

      No because its women deciding and not men. Women have no idea what men see as high smv and really don't care.

      If it were men deciding they'd all be 18 - 19 yr olds with a low partner count and 10 bodies.

      [–]1aguy01 0 points1 point  (1 child)

      "The app has paired 20,000 people resulting in 19 couples."

      It's funny how women think their economic status makes them equal to these men. These girls think that because of their degrees they can be more than just a pump and dump to these guys. The reality is these guys are going to be milking almost all of these 'successful' girls. Because of the differences in male and female SMV, the only ones kept will be the extremely hot ones who actually have SMV that is suitable for these guys.

      [–]DirectEdge 0 points1 point  (1 child)

      I just....I just can't even. Whatever happened to meeting people organically?